17 comments on Spitzer Promotes Clean Energy, Minus Ethanol
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
17 comments on Spitzer Promotes Clean Energy, Minus Ethanol
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Blogroll
NY Blogs
- Gothamist
- Starts & Fits
- Aaron Naparstek
- Baloghblog
- One Atlantic
- bikeblog
- Curbed
- Urban Digs
- OnNYTurf
- Daily Gotham
- StreetsBlog
Local Organizations
- NYC Peak Oil Meet-up
- Peak Oil NYC
- Transportation Alternatives
- Time's Up
- Straphanger's Campaign
- Regional Plan Association
- Green Homes NYC
- Tri-State Transportation Campaign
- Harbor Rail Tunnel
- Auto Free NY
- Walk NY
- Bridge Tolls Advocacy
- Vision 42nd Street
- Car Free
- Right of Way
- Upper Green Side
Local Media
National Peak Oil Sites
Webrings
|
|
|
|
User login
Personnel
Classic posts
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
PONYC Archives
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
Spitzer is not just talking about jobs, he is talking about well paying jobs. I don't see how your story about your friend has much relevance to the issue here.
Beyond that, it is essential here to be talking about jobs in the context of conservation, renewables, and, incidentally, tackling the problem of global warming. People like Cheney poo poo conservation as anathema to the American way of life with no value. Those who fear attacking global warming advance the notion that tackling warming cuts jobs and cuts GDP. Spitzer is proposing an antidote to this attitude.
I read Spitzer's speach and it looks like a good start. However he doesnot see the Peak Oil message, merely the Global Warming message - so he is still trying to GROW NY by adding population and increasing total Electricity comsumption 15% with new power plants, even if he is trying to reduce individual consuption. I give him a 'C' for being only half way there.
One day he will realize we have no more fuel,so there is no reason to build more power plants. There is reason to make existing power plants more efficient while reducing emissions simply because there is less fuel and it is higher priced all of the time.
I thought it was relevant because these artificially produced jobs almost always (1) turn out to be ill paid rubbish in the end, once the fine words of the original speech are long-forgotten, or else (2) turn out - like "ethanol" - to be highly subsidized monsters that pay a few people well at the expense of taxing others more and generally dragging the economy for no useful purpose.
IOW, no matter how you slice it, government make-work is government make-work, and the last thing the overworked American needs is more artificially mandated make-work. After all, Spitzer wouldn't be able to advertise the JOBS he's "creating" unless what he's proposing is more labor-intensive than what came before - and that's virtually NEVER progress.