![]() | Saudi Arabia's Reserve "Depletion Rates" provide Strong Evidence to Support Total Reserves of 175 Gb with only 65 Gb Remaining | The Oil Drum | Energy and the Environment with the API | ![]() |
103 comments on DrumBeat: April 21, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
103 comments on DrumBeat: April 21, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race.”
—H. G. Wells, 1904
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Hummm, 3 to 4 billion for 2400 km of new rail? The USA based DM&E has been trying for about 8 years now to upgrade a couple hundred miles of its track and put in a couple hundred more miles of new track - its billed as the largest new rail construction project in the USA since WWII (?) - and they are getting blocked at every turn. Total cost estimated is over 6 billion for well under 1000 miles (1600 km) of track. The Saudis will have to import the steel rail, wood ties - or set up a factory locally to make concrete ties, obtain large amounts of rock ballast, new locomotive, freight cars, passenger cars, build marshalling yards, stations, etc....
My guess is more like 30 to 40 billion minimum?
For more info on the efforts for DM&E to expand go to:
http://www.dmerail.com/PRB%20Project.html
Also Google DM&E Project to find out the opponents side of the story.
Major rail upgrades and expansion in the USA will take a LONG time if the DM&E project is any indication. From regulatory roadblocks, local NIMBY efforts, financial constraints, etc....
I tried to convince DM&E to go electric traction engines with overhead catanary power and they agreed it would be cheaper to operate that way, but they said they would not do it because it "would be more difficult to interface with the other non-electrified rail lines"
You have a long hard uphill battle for electrification of rail service in the USA - Until the price of diesel fuel goes through the roof - And it will be a bit too late by then?
Jon Kutz
Tinkerer and Dreamer
Of course the French got this contract.