<Mayor Bloomberg's Sustainability Plan: Good, Bad and Ugly The Oil Drum Our World Is Finite: Is This a Problem?>
<DrumBeat: April 29, 2007 DrumBeat DrumBeat: May 1, 2007>

140 comments on DrumBeat: April 30, 2007

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

Show without comments | PDF version

BrianT on April 30, 2007 - 1:09pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

W: How is your orderly declining US dollar going to affect US gasoline prices?

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
wstephens on April 30, 2007 - 1:46pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Gas prices will soar based on supply/demand, currency translation will probably have little effect (personally, I think the dollar is going to rise anyway relative to assets).

I'm just saying that the conventional wisdom over the past couple of years was that the housing bub was going to kill the economy. This started with "The Economist" a while back. After being wrong for a long time about that, now (most?) bears, I believe, have shifted to the "liquidity driving the market higher" argument -- which I feel is a "capitulation" at what is now probably a market top.

Anyway, the "earnings trends" quote above clearly flies in the face of the liquidity argument. Is "private equity" going to buy every non-energy non-financial public asset in order to "re-structure" the bottom line with debt? I hardly think so.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
BrianT on April 30, 2007 - 2:46pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

W: Can't agree with you on the US dollar, but you might be right re the housing bubble.Few have commented on the effect of dramatically increased immigration to the USA in the next 10-15 years. This will provide a prop to housing, while somewhat countering the boomer retirement bulge. The added benefit for the investor-controlled political system is dramatically lower real wages.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
xburb on April 30, 2007 - 11:06pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

OK now we're loggin'

Gas prices will soar based on supply/demand,

It's a shooting gallery. The US economy is lined up in the crosshairs with several shooters waiting their turn. If US consumers change their habits markedly the companies dependent on that income sector suffer . Hence their employees/economy/housing market and so on. Look at the story on Ford and GM this month. I believe the April sales numbers were termed 'awful'. They need to adapt yesterday.

High gasoline price is the bullet today. Score one hit to the automakers. The refinery bottleneck is taking the pressure off WTI (and the world market) for now. When the refiners improve ultilization then
The tale of Two Crudes
comes back into play. Crude price becomes the bullet. World crude market comes home to America again. Inflation of everything crude is made into. Since the US imports and uses the product high on the per capita list it's currency will have to take a hit. Rinse, repeat and wait for demand destruction. Great.

How hard will America fight to keep things just like they are today? Will the paradigm ever shift in time? Asked another way, how important are those snicker doodles, mutiple daily trips to the mini-mart, and that high speed en masse migration to and from the entertainment event. How much will we be willing to pay of our blood and treasure before we change? B/C however much that is, that is exactly what Peak Oil will extract from us.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
wstephens on May 1, 2007 - 11:37am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

I predict (1) the biggest ugliest recession in several generations due to various factors mentioned, (2) followed by a ramp up in solar projects and battery powered vehicles that will essentially fix our energy situation forever. There is some additional risk on the downside, if politicians behave badly, or if the public panics in some unpredictable way.

The battery technology for the cars will be ready (A123 and Altairnano) in a couple of years. Folks are overly-pessimistic about replacing our "oil-consuming capital stock" (i.e. Hirsch Report).

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
AlanfromBigEasy on May 1, 2007 - 10:49pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Altairnano is a fraud and VERY bad joke. Expect zero from them. Not enough time to go into the details.

A123 is for real, but it is a MAJOR step from handtools to EVs !

I prefer EVs that can operate indefinitely WITHOUT ANY BATTERIES AT ALL, and are much more mechanically efficient that GMs Volt for example.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a5/CarrolltonStreetcarAp...

Best Hopes,

Alan

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
wstephens on May 2, 2007 - 3:15pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

What makes you say fraud?

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
AlanfromBigEasy on May 2, 2007 - 4:05pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Several things. They have changed their name multiple times (gold mining a few times), and they still list their industry as "Drug - Other" in Yahoo financial listing.

Endless money pit for decades.

No real products shipped (some joint PR with other fraud companies), no serious partnerships with real companies (A123 has these).

Etc.

Alan

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
wstephens on May 2, 2007 - 4:35pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Couple of points:

* According to investor relations only 1 person from the "old days" is still connected with the company. The company has completely changed from the old mining technology days. I've read every 10-K going back to 1997 to understand Altair's story, and it actually makes sense. The key event was when Altair bought the original nano technology patents from BHP Billiton, and subsequently hired away 18 employees (including PhDs) from BHP's research facility in Reno in 2000.

* Altairnano has partnerships with Alcoa's AFL division, Sherwin Wllliams, AES Corp ($14B utility company, which has a small equity interest in Altairnano, and one of their VPs in on Altairnano's board of directors).

* Altair's CEO, Dr. Gotcher, worked for Avery Dennison and led Avery's teams that created and commercialized the Duracell On-Cell tester battery label.

* Although Altair has only shipped 10 battery packs to Phoenix for their electric truck. Altair plans to ship 200 of them in 2007.

* Yahoo's profile information is extremely misleading. One of Altair's applicatons for their nano Titanium dioxide is medical.

(I do own shares)

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
AlanfromBigEasy on May 2, 2007 - 8:51pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Their PR releases are quite misleading (all I have investigated), I REALLY question their technology and what I have seen of partnerships (Sherwin Williams was interested in super small white paint particles, not batteries) pales in comparision to A123.

I do not like the company as an investment and I discount every (misleading) PR release.

I have written the company off as being of any interest. A long history of fraud and fleecing investors under 8 different names.

I would NEVER plan for the future based on promises from them.

Best Hopes for Reality Based Planning,

Alan

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
wstephens on May 2, 2007 - 10:14pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

So far everything that I've investigated has turned out legit. Altairnano is trying to make progress in 4 divisions, each of which involves their nano Ti technology. This makes following the PRs perhaps difficult, but not misleading. I counted 9 analysts on the last conference call (including Cowen & Co., W R Hambrecht, Thomas Weisel, Merriman, LPL Financial, etc). I don't think that they'd waste their time on a fraud.

That old stuff about different names, mining interests, and mining technology was divested and eliminated years ago.

The battery specs are for 30% lower energy density than conventional Li Ion at room temperature, but in all other respects is far superior. In my opinion, it's superior to A123.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
AlanfromBigEasy on May 2, 2007 - 11:45pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

*IF* you believe their specs.

I do not.

You apparently do,

Best Hopes that I am wrong,

Alan

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

140 comments on DrumBeat: April 30, 2007

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

Show without comments | PDF version