12 comments on Oil Talk, C-Span, Sunday 9:30am EDT
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
12 comments on Oil Talk, C-Span, Sunday 9:30am EDT
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
—Big Oil Executive
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
This point was specifically addressed by the speaker. He pointed out that there is no "Law", only a draft proposal. And that draft will undoubtedly undergo many more changes before it is even presented to the Iraqi parliament. He also pointed out that currently the only people current working to develop new projects in Iraq are Russia and China. And you can be sure that any contracts signed by China or Russia will be far more favorable to those two countries than to the Iraqi people.
That being said, exactly what would you expect from the proposed law? Would you think that everything should be nationalized, as Russia and Venezuela are currently doing? If there is anything that will reduce oil production in Iraq it would be total nationalization of everything. If that happened then the corrupt politicians could just divide the money from current production, leaving nothing for maintenance or development.
And also pointed out on the show was that the oil companies mentioned in the proposal were truly international companies, not just US companies.
Ron Patterson
Iraqi is an occupied country and any legal changes are themselves illegal. Before the occupation, the oil resources were the property of the Iragi state. Most Iragis think they should remain so.
Some politicians are corrupt, a fact widely used by oil companies e.g. Nigeria. Others such as Wolfowitz and Cheny appear to be corrupt too.
Doubtless US oil comppanies are misunderstood saints. But as participants is Cheny's energy task force they received maps of Iragi oil reserves. They have also been consulted before the Iragi Parliamnt about the proposed oil law.
The biggest US embassy in the world is soon to open in Bagdad. American townships are being constructed in Irag for a permanent presence of US troops. How loong is the occupation intended to last - 1000 years?