Blogroll
- 321 Energy
- The Archdruid Report
- ASPO Canada
- Ali Samsam Bakhtiari
- The Sir Robert Bond Papers
- Briarpatch Magazine
- Chatham House
- Paul Chefurka
- The Council of Canadians
- The Daily Canuck
- The Daily Reckoning
- The Dominion
- Energy and Capital
- Energy Bulletin
- Feasta
- Financial Sense
- Global Public Media
- Graphoilogy
- The Garret Hardin Society
- Richard Heinberg
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- iTulip
- James Kunstler
- LATOC
- Darryl McMahon
- George Monbiot
- Murky View
- Dmitri Orlov
- Plants for a Future
- Raise the Hammer
- Ramsay House Project
- Rigzone Canada
- R-Squared
- Nouriel Roubini
- Safe Haven
- Shack in the Middle
- Michael Shedlock
- Treehugger
- The Tyee
- Jeff Vail
- Vive le Canada
- John Warnock
- Whiskey and Gunpowder
User login
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
Well, this is useless Brian. You can't answer my questions, nor defend your points, because you have done no research.
Pointing back to the same industry promo clips that your entire 'post' is based on, is void of any meaning. It does, however, make abundantly clear what the level of your thinking and writing is.
And that is, as I said, way below par for TOD. I'm starting to think you were set up, and you'll be the laughing stock of the family soon.
In the meantime, are you going to tell us if you work for the nuke industry? Personally, I can't figure any other reson why someone would produce this drivel.
PS I didn't make this personal, you did, And you're not very good at that either.
PS 2 You say:"You say that numbers are crunched here. Why don't you prove it."
I'm sure Stuart et al will really appreciate being cut to size in this manner.
HeIsSoFly,
Any idea how much energy is lost when instead of direct use of natural gas or nuclear they are used to refine this third product oil?
Seems like we are trading one lame horse for another lame horse, and that to run a senseless horse; the auto industry.
As far as multiples of nuclear plants, where is all that water to come from, I am led to understand that present use is about maximum? Could be wrong here though and as well maybe it would be a goodly step in removing our treaty obligations with the first nations, you know that part that goes....'So long as the sun shines the grass grows and the rivers run'. Get those nukes steaming away and with Monsanto having a lock on the death of grass and just about everything else green and growing all we would have to do then is wait for a solar eclipse and voila this devastated land would really be ours...the only question is would we want it?
You obvisouly do not comprehend the scope of what is happening with the resurgence of the nuclear industry. 30 reactors being built right now. $60+ billion going into to that.
In Canada, they already have all the local, provincial and federal support. Candu cut big money deals with Hitachi to ensure no taxpayer financed overruns. They do not need anyone readig the Oil drum to agree with them.
I am saying prove anything that you "HeisSofly" are saying. None of what you said has any number crunching. None of what you say has any research. I am saying that you cannot figure your way out of a paper bag. It is why you think because information that upsets your world view is presented you think that someone must be paying me to present it.
you say that you did not start making it personal. Reread your first posts. You are a silly liar and a buffoon.
===============
http://advancednano.blogspot.com