The contents below are paid advertisements. Their appearance does not imply an endorsement by The Oil Drum.
“First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.”
—Gandhi
Search The Oil Drum with Google
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
- Enjoying Life Close to Home: Fun Streets
TOD:Europe
- The First Wave Energy Farm of the World...It's About Time...
- Some Lessons from Bailout Month
- UK House Sellers In Denial About The Property Crisis - Energy Too?
TOD:Canada
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
- Weekend Energy Listening: Wind Power with Paul Gipe
TOD:ANZ
Peak Oil Primers
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.







GAIA Host Collective
Re: The "Bidding War" for declining crude oil exports
While OECD oil inventories have fallen from their highs last year, they are still at adequate levels, although the EIA is warning that we will drop to the bottom of the five year range this year, especially in terms of Days of Supply: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/gifs/Slide25.gif
However, focusing on OECD inventories, as an indication of what is going on in the entire world, is like asserting that no one went hungry in the US in the Thirties, based on surveys of the top half of incomes earners.
Consider a map of OECD versus non-OECD countries:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:OECD-memberstates.png
We don’t have to look hard for reports of forced energy conservation in poorer regions. Leanan has posted countless stories. I think that one of the best is the following WSJ article in 2006. IMO, inventory levels in OECD countries are okay, because of forced energy conservation in areas like Africa, but the pattern that I expect to see is forced energy conservation moving up the food chain.
Published on 18 Nov 2006 by Wall St Journal. Archived on 23 Nov 2006.
As Fuel Prices Soar, A Country Unravels
by Chip Cummins
Conakry, Guinea
A story of problems with forced energy conservation at the margins, in a OECD country:
http://online.wsj.com
Running on Empty
On a Road to Nowhere
An Alaskan village asks a scary question:
What happens when oil is too expensive to use?
By RUSSELL GOLD
June 9, 2007; Page A1
Excerpt:
I live in northern Sweden at the same latitude as Alaska. I heat our house with wood. Now its cheap, and we have abundant wood recources in a region with a scarce population.
But i wonder what will happen when oil is in shortage? How can we harvest and transport the wood?? It sure won´t be cheap anymoore.
We certainly are in uncharted waters.
Living in southern Sweden, and also heating with wood (call it really, really efficient biofuels if you want).
To harvest and transport around 2000 kWh of firewood (a solid cube of 1x1x1 meter), you need to use around 2 liters of fossil fuels, or 20 kWh of energy. And this number is declining due to developments in forestry.
It will always be profitable to harvest firewood, as long as there is any oil left. Yes, it will become more expensive, but it will remain the cheapest source of energy here in Sweden. No matter how expensive oil will be, it will always be cheaper than heating with electricity-based methods, as the electricity price follows the price of oil over time.
Anyway, for household needs you will eventually harvest with a manual saw or axe, and pull the wood home with a horse or a human-powered cart, as been done in the past. No worries. Just make sure you own some forest within manual distance. I do.
Do you think 10 million Swedes can all move to firewood use? Trees don't grow all that quickly at these latitudes.
We are 9 millions. I don´t know, but during for example WWII
we had mostly firewood use(if i recall it right) without a problem. But then we where about 6 million inhabitants.
Precent times i certainly believe that we in northern Sweden, with a scarce population, have no problems what so ever with wood recources. How it would play out in for example Stockholm area today i am unsure about, but during the war Stockholm made it with wood as i recall it(but with a smaller population, and houses prepared for wood burning). Nowadays houses in urban areas are not prepared for wood burning.
The annual growth of forest in Sweden is around 80 million solid cubic meters, or approx 9 cubic meters (at least 18000 kWh or 1800 liters of gasoline or 450 gallons) per capita. We are nine million people.
Today Sweden derives it's energy from the following sources (off the top of my hat): 20% nuclear, 20% hydro, 40% oil (almost entirely transportation) and 20% other (including biofuels, industry heat recycling, burning waste - almost no landfills anymore).
Less than 10% of the forest growth goes to biofuels, the rest is refined using hydro and nuclear power into paper pulp, paper or processed timber (two by fours etc) and exported. We export our energy surpluses (a significant portion of the nuclear and hydro goes into the paper industry or metals (primarly iron/steel)) as refined raw materials, which pay a lot better than wood pellets or firewood.
There would be no problem increasing the biofuel portion of the forestry if need be, but it would kill off quite a few jobs in the paper industry. This illustrates that the immediate effects of peak oil, at least in Sweden, will be economic. About 250 000 people are employed in the automotive service sector (tires, workshops, gasoline stations, roadside restaurants etc etc) or automotive industry (Volvo/Ford and Saab/GM). If driving would decrease by 50%, 50% of those jobs would be lost, which would be a significant part of the workforce.
If push comes to shove you could run the entire diesel fleet of harvesters, carriers, tractors and trucks on wood chip gasified producer air. Did it in the past (WW2), could definetly do it again.
Myself, I'm a net energy producer, I sell more energy as firewood than our household and farm consume, including electricity and all fossil fuels even private use (but excluding emergy in bought equipment which is a bit difficult to calculate. Emergy in our own improvments and maintainance of forest, fields and structures is included though). Firewood pay better for the primary producer than selling lumber as paper pulp material, and most Swedish small houses have at least a wood stove as backup, and 400 000 houses heat with wood furnace coupled to watertanks. No problem finding buyers for firewood.
We heat our entire 2000 sq ft house using a single american Vermont Castings wooden stove, but then the house have been properly insulated in recent years, even though it was originaly built 100 years ago.
Sweden could be self-sufficient in energy, but it would require sacrifices, and walls towards the rest of Europe. However, we're members of the European Union, which has stated that all member states should share their energy resources, so we will be in the shit with the rest of them. At least peacefully, as we've dismantled most of our military anyway so we wouldn't be able to keep it to ourself anyways.
At least the climate keeps most people away, but global warming may change that and there goes the advantage of our sparsely populated country...
I have been to Kotzebue one summer many years ago. I remember it as being totally flat without any trees within perhaps tens of miles. We flew in low on Alaskan Airways and it was all lakes and tundra as far as one could see. It is very different from Sweden at a similar latitude. I have been to Northern Norway and the trees near Harstad, for example, grow to only around one meter in height. Also, they are all bent over in the prevailing wind direction. Quite miserable.
That has nothing in common with the vast Swedish softwood forests. Ever been to the forest districts of Canada?
Sweden is covered by dense pine and spruce forest, with the exception of "fjällen", ie the mountains to the north of Sweden. Towards the south hardwood becomes more and more common.
Hej Cornucopia
Jag håller med om allt du skriver. Själv är jag äldre, och kommer inte att orka med att hugga, transportera, och hantera större mängder ved. Men jag räknar kallt med att det inte skall vara några problem även ifall du inte har egen skog. Det finns gott om skog i närheten, och gott om folk som kommer att vara fattiga, och som kommer att kunna leverera ved till oss som har pengar och kan betala för oss.
Kenneth
Som norrlänning har du antagligen rätt, Kenneth. Kan vara svårare i de mer välbefolkade delarna av södra Sverige.
Thanks, and as well for the article Running on Empty
On a Road to Nowhere
Would anyone care to comment on the storage of wind produced hydrogen/oxygen in those northern areas? It seems to me that the direct use, of stored hydrogen and oxygen from wind, as heat and possibly lighting (gas) would be efficient. What would be the problems?
The pond shrinks but not evenly or fairly.
Swede the usual comment about woods efficiency is that it heats you twice once when you cut it and once when you burn it. Hows that for cold comfort?
Thanks CrystalRadio, you are conforting me with positive thoughts.
Westexas; thanks for yet another interesting article, but I would just like to comment re:your continuing use of Guinea as a example of an African state in PO demise. African states suffer from a multitude of problems and I think the rush to apportion PO effects to particular instances has to be done with a degree of care. For example here is a piece from Oct 2004 which deals with Guinea's severe problems in the period 2003-2004:
http://www.afrol.com/articles/14446
As you will see the country was even in 2003 having severe problems with power outages etc (and as I recall oil prices were only just then starting their main ascent). The causes of these problems as described in the article were (and still are as far as I can see) multiple. There seems to be a tendancy to rush to 'doomerish' conclusion as regards PO and Africa, but Africa has never been a simple place to analyse.