130 comments on DrumBeat: June 3, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
130 comments on DrumBeat: June 3, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Government is too big and too important to be left to the politicians.”
—Claire Huchet Bishop
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
In one of the previous Drumbeats Leanan spoke about a trip to Youngstown, OH and encountering a Kunstlerian nightmare. Well, there's no substitute for eyes on the ground...but one thing I "like" to do is look at these places with satellite eyes...
Youngstown, OH: On a Kunstlerian scale of 1-10 this probably rates about 3. Not super terrible or anything.
Los Angeles, CA: This is the mack daddy by which Kunstleriness is rated, this pegs the meter out at 10.
Atlanta, GA: Don't let this one fool ya. The city center is small and appears to be otherwise sparsely populated, but emanating for miles upon miles from the center is sprawling suburbs of McMansion farm Cul-de-sacs. This too receives a 10 for Kunstleriness.
Tampa, and St. Petersburgh, FL: 9...maybe another 10. You can be the judge.
If those beauties don't make you cry and lose faith in humanities survival...I'm not sure what will.
If you want a nightmare feet-on-the-ground along with your eyes on the ground, take the train to Atlanta and try to walk around the town.
It might be the most depressing place I have ever visited. There is no place for pedestrians, no green space, nothing but roads and fast cars and tight-lipped people hurrying to get somewhere -- the few that are actually out of their cars seem afraid to be unprotected.
I'm sure there are nice places in Atlanta -- but you need a car to get to them.
Funny, I live in Atlanta without a car. I guess it is a question of being willing to make the effort or just waiting for everything to be served up on a silver platter.
Yes the suburban sprawl surrounding the city is terrible and it does put a toll on the city with major interstates cutting through the heart of town to make it easier for suburb-to-suburb commuters to get around. But the city and the metro, while intertwined, are not that same thing. There are lots of people who live in the city without a car and do just fine. Many of the city's oldest neighborhoods, so called street car suburbs, with shady streets, walkable neighborhood retail, parks, and other amenities that create a great quality of life are accessible by mass transit. The city has one of the strongest tree ordinances in the country and working hard to undo the Robert Moses type mistakes of the 1960s in the central business districts.
Getting off at the AmTrak station and walking around a few blocks tells you as much about the city as does seeing a city from the interstate. I realize that it is trendy to bash Atlanta but some of us are working for real change instead of taking easy potshots on the internet based on limited superficial observations. So how about not condemning everyone in a city based on group think. If people here weren't friendly enough for you, perhaps you should look at your own comments and ask why that might be.
I live downtown, get around on mass transit, my bike, and my two feet. I could move to another city, get a car, feel smug and superior about the appearance of my surroundings while actually living a more environmentally destructive lifestyle but I'd rather walk the walk instead of talking the talk.
Sorry if I sound overly defensive about all of this, but it really annoys me to hear the same old recycled speaking points about where I live. I get tired of hearing it is impossible to live in Atlanta without a car, when I do it quite easily. I get tired of hearing there is no green space in Atlanta when there are two large green spaces right outside my window. I get tired of hearing there is nothing but concrete here when according to the national forest service, this is the most heavily forested major urban area in the US. I get tired of hearing how environmentally ignorant builders are when Atlanta has one of the highest concentrations of LEED certified high rises in the country. Yep, sounds like the absolute worst place in the country!
See this kind of superficial judgment makes me wonder about all of the other observations here and how many of them are similarly based on such shallow observations and guilt by association. Suburban Atlanta does have many terrible characteristics and the city isn't perfect but it certainly isn't the dehumanizing moonscape that many make it out to be.
Now if you'll excuse me, I'm biking over to the farmers market to buy some locally grown produce. Since I'm not arriving in my car, I guess all the veggies will be wilted and the fruit rotten. Afterall, you can't get anywhere nice in Atlanta without a ton of glass and steel wrapped around you, right?
Wow. I'm glad to hear it is really a pleasant place.
I was reporting a personal experience, not making a blanket judgement of anything. Actually, not having or expecting a silver platter, I hired a taxi and went out to a very pleasant part of town where the Martin Luther King memorial is, and walked around. It's just that between point A and point B wasn't really walkable or bikeable, so far as I could see. But then, I didn't know what to expect, being a tourist from a small town in Oregon. I hoped for peach trees downtown, I suppose -- sort of like English peasants believed the streets of London were paved with gold. Silly me.
I am quite hopeful that most people on this blog are less superficial in their immediate judgements. Sorry.
My rule of thumb (imperfect as all such rules are) is that any place laid out and developed before WW II is going to be a fairly decent place to live (at worst) unless it has declined into a slum.
Any place developed from 1950 to 1970 is "not the worst" for human scale and pleasantness.
Anyplace developed post-1990 *IS* the worst.
Best Hopes for Back to the Future,
Alan
The city has one of the strongest tree ordinances in the country and working hard to undo the Robert Moses type mistakes of the 1960s in the central business districts.\\
Funny... I lived in Atlanta several years back. And I don't remember things the same way. Every piece of land that could be built upon was in play. KFC's and condo's mixed it up. Sidewalks? Forgetaboutit. Waste of concrete. There is a lot of ornamental landscaping, bfd, the sound of leaf blowers and line trimmers never ends.
When you leave you'll realize how lousy it really is.
Yeah, downtown Atlanta isn't that bad.. but the other 95% of the city is horrible. It isn't just the car centric city planning but also the attitude.
When I lived in DC, pedestrians would typically step boldly in front of traffic as they crossed the street knowing the cars would stop.
In Atlanta, pedestrians are typically seen making a mad dash across the street to avoid being run over by swarms of SUVs who may stop for pedestrians in the cross walk or may just swerve around them.
It brings back memories of the old Atari game Frogger.
Atlanta is the least pedestrian friendly city I have ever lived in or visited.
Type in 1300 St. Andrew St., New Orleans, LA 70130 and ask for the hybrid view.
Note the low % of land area devoted to the automobile (streets and off street parking), and our maze of one-way streets. On zoom you can barely see the mix of 1,2 and 3 story buildings.
The larger homes typically either have one rich family or 4 to 10 apartments/condos. Many of the smaller ones are duplexes.
Best Hopes for walkable neighborhoods,
Alan
Whether or not you are a fan of 'James' - I am in a reserved way - you have to admit that he seems to have spawned a term that may have a long future. Darwinian, Newtonian and now Kunstlerian. Inevitability is on his side.
My paltry thought for the day is that the actual PO point in history which so many seem so intent on defining and sharpening may be less historically important than the psychological effect that will follow. We are probably right at that great turning point of peak expandability, at least using the paradigm of fossil resources. While the possibilities of such strategies as CTL may seem tempting, the fact that they are merely mitigating and postponing strategies rather than actual sustainable solutions will both divide and dishearten the masses. This turning point will not play out instantaneously, of course, but will be the long distance runner to the sprinter of propaganda.
The geological realities are pretty straightforward as is the realistic long term solution. The real challenge will be to maintain some sense of progress and hope against a background of loss of 'growth'. Growth is not only an industrial and economic crutch but a cultural one too. Did I just say 'cultural one two'? Must have been Freudian. Or Kunstlerian.
progress and hope are spiritual ideals, not material reality. There is no need for endless increase in stuff, powered by an endless supply of oil to have a fulfilling life -- in fact, those things just get in the way.
Actually, there are very material reasons why those are
not merely phsycological realities but also physically
inseperable from the continued survival of this economy.
the oil fuels an intensity and scale of that game orders
of magnitude greater than ever before possible, and with
that contrast in mind perhaps even recent history looks
stable or even static in comparison. However, all things
must grow or die. Living things can't grow beyond very
modest limits, and the abundant diversity of life is a way
the grow-or-die dynamic yields healthy outcomes. Tipping
the balance of power through technology begins to turn
a stable though dynamic biological community into a runaway
escalation, which will be more destructive the longer it
goes uncorrected. Clever being that we humans are, we
stepped into the trap. Once you start this avalanche going,
the rules of the game are the same, but you have to run
faster and faster. It's not just the same moves of the
game played over and over in a circle, but the same kind
of moves of the game played with an ever-higher ante and
ever-higher stakes spiralling up to where we are now.
Oil is one of the major factors fuelling this escalation,
quite literally. It isn't th eonly one. All such runaway
processes eventually run out of steam and crash. The one
we live in today is breaking down, and oil peaking is only one of the reasons.
But no, you have it backwards. It isn't spiritual ideas
which have dictated material reality. Quite the other
way around- the material reality of living in an escalation
played a significant role in the evolution of human cultures
over the past 5 to 10 thousand years. Those cultural
attributes which were more compatible with the material reality of escalation have become more pronounced.
Vision does not drive material culture, except insofar
as those aspects of material culture driven _do not affect
the bottom line_ of competition and survival. Those material
realities dictate the viable parameters of vision, and
incompatible vision is eliminated.