Blogroll
- 321 Energy
- The Archdruid Report
- ASPO Canada
- Ali Samsam Bakhtiari
- The Sir Robert Bond Papers
- Briarpatch Magazine
- Chatham House
- Paul Chefurka
- The Council of Canadians
- The Daily Canuck
- The Daily Reckoning
- The Dominion
- Energy and Capital
- Energy Bulletin
- Feasta
- Financial Sense
- Global Public Media
- Graphoilogy
- The Garret Hardin Society
- Richard Heinberg
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- iTulip
- James Kunstler
- LATOC
- Darryl McMahon
- George Monbiot
- Murky View
- Dmitri Orlov
- Plants for a Future
- Raise the Hammer
- Ramsay House Project
- Rigzone Canada
- R-Squared
- Nouriel Roubini
- Safe Haven
- Shack in the Middle
- Michael Shedlock
- Treehugger
- The Tyee
- Jeff Vail
- Vive le Canada
- John Warnock
- Whiskey and Gunpowder
User login
Archives
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
Our local electric supplier which does suscribe to TVA's 'green power' program and gives some incentives for 'energy star' appliances, recently did the opposite in billing by establishing a 'level cost' program where the customer pays each month an average cost determined by the previous year's usage. As one of my friends who had just signed up for the program glowingly told me, 'Now we can use all the power we want without having to worry about getting hit with a huge bill at the end of the month! You should sign up.' Of course that means that next year's average bill will be correspondingly higher. If this should happen to trigger a conservation response, the customer would see no benefit from it until the following year. I told her it was one of the worst ideas I had heard of in electric billing.
I agree, one year for feedback is simply not enough. A weekly feedback mechanism, or even daily as indicated in this posting will do the best. (I say daily because purchasing more on the cards and a rough output of days remaining gives a strong incentive to alter habits)
Smart meters help with load leveling and consumer consciouness of the problem. They are one part of the larger solution, which firstly can be attributted to negawatts(using current best efficiencies) for the short term solution (Probably yielding 10 years respite from increasing energy prices), a midterm solution of ramping up coal/nuclear/wind/solar, and a longterm solution of closing the output loop and doing full lifecycle analysis upon which time we will have reached a renewable society.