163 comments on Updated World Oil Forecasts, including Saudi Arabia
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
163 comments on Updated World Oil Forecasts, including Saudi Arabia
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
The contents below are paid advertisements. Their appearance does not imply an endorsement by The Oil Drum.
“Men argue; nature acts.”
—Voltaire
Search
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: Stoneleigh, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart
- Technician: Super G
- Emeritus: Yankee, Dave Cohen
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- RFK and Garbage Trucks: Two Measures of Success
- David Paterson: First Openly Peak Oil Aware Governor
- Bogota Part 2: Transmilenio Bus Rapid Transit
TOD:Europe
- Crude Oil: how high can it go? (19th century whaling as a model for oil depletion and price volatility)
- European Gas Security: The Future of Natural Gas
- La sicurezza delle forniture di gas in Europa
TOD:Canada
- Peak Oil, Peak Food, Peak Risk
- The Year In Review And a Look Ahead for 2008
- A Yuletide Finance Round-Up
TOD:ANZ
Peak Oil Primers
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- Ecological Economics
- David Strahan
- Econbrowser
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- Environmental Economics
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- Peak Oil Premonitions
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Organizations
- ASPO
- ASPO-Ireland
- ASPO-Italia
- ASPO-USA
- The Community Solution
- Oil Depletion Analysis Centre
- Post Carbon Institute
|
|
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Sustainable web hosting provided by
GAIA Host Collective


The depletion rate is the amount of remaining reserves consumed this year (by definition). I think you might be confusing it with the decline rate, which is the amount by which production declines year to year (an error I was guilty of myself in some of my very first posts).
Some more info on annual depletion rates of remaining URR.
Tariq Shafiq, a petroleum engineer who was Vice President and Executive Director of the Iraq National Oil Company (INOC) said:
http://www.mees.com/postedarticles/oped/a46n50d02.htm
Shafiq thinks 4-5% depletion rate is good for large fields. Perhaps my forecast for Saudi Arabia is too optimistic since I am assuming a maximum of about 5.3%, which is greater than Shafiq's upper limit of 5%.
If Saudi Arabia produces its fields at a higher rate of say 6% the forecast curve in my Fig 9 will show a slower production decline rate in the next few years but then the decline rate will steepen even more. The North Sea is a good example. From 2000 to 2003, the annual depletion rate of remaining URR was just over 12%/yr. As the depletion rate drops due to maturing fields, the production decline rate has been around 10%/yr.
Colin Campbell's modelling assumes that for
http://www.feasta.org/documents/feastareview/campbell.htm
The midpoint is the date when 50% of the URR has been produced. As Saudi Arabia has passed midpoint some years ago, assuming 112 Gb produced out of an assumed total URR 175 Gb, maintaining an upper limit of about 5.3% annual depletion rate of remaining reserves seems appropriate. 5.3% was the depletion rate reached in Aug 2006 when it is believed that Saudi Arabia was producing at its maximum potential.
Here is a more detailed view of the first part of Fig 9 which shows the depletion rate of remaining URR exceeding Shafiq’s 5% limit starting in about Mar 2005 and returning back to just under 5% in Feb 2007.
I'm still waiting for an ex Aramco employee to post here and clarify Saudi Arabia's forecasts :)
No, I am aware of the difference between depletion and decline. But a constant depletion rate (as a percentage) against a shrinking reserve will result in declining production.
In other words, if I have 100 Gb of reserves this year and I deplete those reserves by 5% or 5 Gb (produce that much) then next year I have 95 Gb (not counting reserve growth for a moment, ok?). Now if I deplete 95 Gb by 5%, I only produce 4.75 Gb for the year.
Thus, if I maintain a constant depletion rate against a shrinking reserve resource my production must decline. That was how I understood Ace's comment and his further explanation below appears to go in the same direction though again he didn't directly answer that.
Anyway that is why I asked, because that is how I understood the comment and it was clear from your comment that you believe he meant something else so I was hoping for a bit more clarity.
"The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function." -- Dr. Albert Bartlett
Into the Grey Zone
"In other words, if I have 100 Gb of reserves this year and I deplete those reserves by 5% or 5 Gb (produce that much) then next year I have 95 Gb (not counting reserve growth for a moment, ok?). Now if I deplete 95 Gb by 5%, I only produce 4.75 Gb for the year."
This is exactly what I mean - agreed. Another point on depletion and decline rates from your example above is that when the depletion rate (as a percentage of remaining URR) stays constant from year to year then the decline rate is equal to the depletion rate. From above production of 5 Gb in year one also falls by 5% (0.25 Gb) to give 4.75 Gb in year two.
Also, the URR which I use above is an estimate of proven, probable and yet to find or as Colin Campbell says "yet to produce".