36 comments on API Energy IQ Survey
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
36 comments on API Energy IQ Survey
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“What people need to hear loud and clear is that we're running out of energy in America.”
—George W. Bush, May 2001
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I looked at the first several pages of questions, and my impression was that it looked more like a push-poll or exercise in writing trick questions than a legitimate test of knowledge. E.g. #5 (makes no distinction between OIL and ENERGY, thus misleading), #7 (irrelevant, but aims at the emotions), and #10 (rolls the likes of oil shale together with renewables).
The authors should be ashamed of themselves.
Well, if you don't know the difference between oil and energy, I would say that is a lack of knowledge, not a trick question.
Of course, our own quiz, which steers everyone to think of Peak Oil, is also a push-poll, by your definition.
Such problems hurt the reliabilty and thus the validity of outcomes drawn from the results.
Too bad there wasn't a control group made up of people provided the information and differences in terminology and then the quiz.
I think everyone picks the questions so as to make the point they are looking for, but it seems like they have tried a little harder than most. I didn't want to be too hard on them for that, and instead tried to sum up the points that they seem to be making - and which seem reasonable to me, and which don't.
I might note that the way they were hoping that we would write this up is
"Americans' knowledge of oil is terrible. We could be making bad decisions because of this. Oil companies profits aren't really all that high, and oil companies are making significant investments in new technologies. We really aren't all that dependent on imports, either."
I couldn't do that.
These are links to a few other write-ups of the oil quiz:
Geoffrey Styles - Energy Outlook
Captain's Quarters Blog
Robert Rapier - R-Squared
I also found the API press release. I couldn't figure out how to link to it, so I will post it in another comment.
E-P, you say "#7 (irrelevant, but aims at the emotions)".
Irrevelant to what ?
One of the principal criticisms of the oil companies by the U.S. congress, newspapers, and average person is that the "oil companies" are getting big profits.
Question #7 points out that a significant share of these profits go to average people in the form of 401k returns, pensions, and other investments.
Irrelevant in general. Significant shares of ALL corporate profits go to pension funds, 401k's, etc. You might as well argue that the US taxpayer ought to support more wars, because war is good for the defense industry and many pension funds hold defense stocks. It's just special pleading, and deliberately misleading to boot.
If the merits of the oil industry (such as it living off an absolutely irreplaceable one-time gift from Nature) are such that the US citizens should insist on it paying more taxes for what it gets, then it should pay more taxes. We had this same argument around electric utilities, and decided that they didn't merit a guaranteed return either.