245 comments on Requesting Feedback on Renewable Diesel Essay
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
245 comments on Requesting Feedback on Renewable Diesel Essay
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Home Buyers Demand Short Commutes, Efficient Homes (with Backyards, Parking, lots of Square Feet)
- Streets: Utilitarian Corridors or Livable Public Space
- Summer Streets a Success!
TOD:Europe
- IEA WEO 2008 - Fossil Fuel Ultimates and CO2 Emissions Scenarios
- The IEA WEO 2008: Will coal usage be phased out?
- Oilwatch Monthly - November 2008
TOD:Canada
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
TOD:ANZ
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“No civilization can survive the physical destruction of its resource base.”
—Bruce Sterling
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
I agree with you Concerned – the scaling issue is THE Alfa and Omega in understanding biofuels and ethanol, today and for the future. Obviously alongside the reality of EROEI.
I recall the essay titled “That Cubic mile…”, depicting the annual world wide crude oil consumption to be approximately 1 cubic mile. And if we agree that oil is virtually gone in 100 years for all practical uses – the frenetic chase taking place today to substitute this must be done with renewable crops ….
And if memory serves – hardwood (threes) may render 25% of it’s volume/mass to be converted into ethanol – I think ….
Now from my metric part of the world I reached for my calculator – and defined my standard three to be ½ cubic meters (that’s a square trunk 0.25mX0.25mX 8.0m height- a realistic three-volume …)
And the cubic mile is equals 4096000000 m3, and some math on this give me 8192000000 threes, and for that size of threes I need 5 meters between them in a grid pattern. Making a square patch from this I’m getting 453 km X 453 km.
Wowww….
And for ease I round up to 500 km X 500 km – NOW these threes are PURE OIL THREES (from my original cubic) – so I have to make real threes from it by multiplying this amount with 4…
The energy needed to convert this square patch into actual fuel is coming on top of this, and should hopefully NOT overshoot the initial energy content contained in it….
If it takes say 50years to grow one of these sample trees, we WOULD CONSTANTLY HAVE THE WHOLE OF THE AREA OF AFRICA GOING AS A PERMANENT FUEL-GENERATING-AREA FOR THE WORLD –
I’m sighting U-t-o-p-i-a all over the place here …
I'm afraid simular utopian issues apply for all other crops as well ...
THE singlemost constraints of scaling stuff is - mass,volume,seasons,timelines and the boogeyman EROEI.
We obviously cannot produce enough biofuels to keep everything running at present levels. Just as obviously, not everything we presently run is of equal importance.
The world can probably live without fast sports cars. the truth of the matter is that the number of private passenger vehicles and the amount to which they are used could be reduced to a small fraction of present levels with the implementation of a serious electrified mass transit program in places that don't yet have it.
Agricultual equipment, ambulances, fire trucks, shuttle buses, ships, heavy equipment, etc. - that is a different matter. It is truly a matter of life or death that we keep these high priority devices running.
We undoubtedly CAN produce enough biodiesel to at least keep the high-priority equipment running. That is why RR's article is so important.