13 comments on The Round-Up: July 17th 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
13 comments on The Round-Up: July 17th 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
User login
Personnel
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
Nothing personal, but don't you find that a bit strange?
Would you leave that same comment for Leanan at the Drumbeat?
It's obvious to anyone, going through the list of articles here, that it takes time to gather all that. It's equally obvious that if only 3 people show their appreciation, that's not a lot. As in compared to that time.
Over at the Drumbeat, people won't stop talking/writing/posting, but Stoneleigh, who posts news that's at least as interesting, can't get people to post more than a handful of responses for all that effort. And that's just because this is Canada?! The largest single source of US oil and gas?
If you think she does it wrong, or you don't care about financial news, or about Canada, or something else, whatever it may be, I'd say that it's really important for her that you let your presence here be known.
Sure, at the Drumbeat more people are reacting, so it's more of an ego booster for y'all, but the first step there is YOU writing a comment, isn't it?
I find the compilation of economic posts very interesting, in fact IMO economical factors will precede peak oil factors even though they may somehow interrelate based on event timing.
I know very little about Canada on a personal basis as I was never stationed there, one can only pick up so much on vacation. So, I'm not really qualified to give opinions on Canada as I don't have the first hand gut level feel for the street there.
The intent of my post was to acknowledge Stoneleigh's work. I guess I'm not a sweet talker and the post didn't come out to your liking. :-)
Thanks :)
For other readers - you don't have to know anything about Canada to post here. TOD:C covers the Canadian energy scene, but also (as you can see from above) the huge problems in the credit markets, the inexorable progression towards a North American Union, climate change, relevant international occurrences etc. The focus - energy and our future - is quite broad.
This is very much my view as well. A financial crash can proceed with lightning speed once it gets going, and this one appears to be hitting the fan right now. The biggest concern is the potential for a cascading effect - a string of exploding hedge funds leading to bank runs and a crash of the money supply.
I wish you were right. If you are not we change plans. :-)
I have no scientific training but I have well developed knack for watching people and reading tea leaves.
I would expect the market to suffer massive losses sometime soon, and as always they will halt trading to allow the well connected to mitigate losses. This should bring a very temporary parallel collapse of commodities.
Then it's off to the races.
If they manufacture another 9/11 in order to attack Iran it will just happen faster.
Hey!!!, the economic collapse is the fault of the "tererists".
All we can do is sit in the recliner by the side of the river and watch the bodies of our enemies float by.
I would expect halts to trading simply becase the electronic exchanges will be overwhelmed with sell orders. That happened on a small scale in February, when the DJIA fell over 500 points in a short space of time. It also happened in 1929. If we have a real rush for the exits then there's no way orderly trading can proceed. It doesn't require a conspiracy of the wealthy for trading to be disrupted.
For that reason I wouldn't recommend trying to be clever and shorting into the teeth of a crash. Trading gaps and counterparty risk could make that a very risky strategy, even if you're right about the direction and the timing of a move. Better to cash out early and sit on the sidelines.
I am expecting a parallel commodity crash - indeed a crash of all asset prices across the board relative to cash, but as you say, I would expect any resulting glut of essential commodities to be temporary.
No worries. Hard assets in hand or nothing, I can spit a cherry stone a lot further then I trust these guys.
The only problem is that very liquid positions slowly erode, but the real game will start soon enough. Sort of like the cost of doing business.
What would your view on this be?
Here
http://www.urbansurvival.com/week.htm