154 comments on Energy Policy per American Petroleum Institute
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
154 comments on Energy Policy per American Petroleum Institute
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Men argue; nature acts.”
—Voltaire
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
It simplifies everything and gets rid of all those details that you have to think about to actually make anything really work
Right. Like the corrput government we have, as exemplified by this failed de-energy bill, has a solution?
Just look at Los Angles and the rest of California. As far as their energy policy has gone, and it is as leftist as it gets, it's a failure.
They don't call it "metrofail" for nothing.
"corrput government" like a meeting of a VP guy in a undisclosed location with a bunch of undisclosed cronies?
hmmmmm..I live in Los Angeles and when Enron was busy turning off the grid in Santa Monica and Pasadena my good old Department of Water and Power kept chugging along.
"Department of Water and Power kept chugging along."
Yeah, like good old TVA keeps rolling along as well, despite being 'public power'. I believe that LADWP was run at that time by a former Chattanoogan and TVA board chairman, S David Freeman.
S David Freeman.
Yea- Freedman introduced several important fixes the LADWP, he laid off several employees and cut expenses, the unions whined but the mayor was Republican and the councilman felt that they had no choice because of the debt load the dept was running.
The best move he made was sticking the the general plan, thats estimated the amount of population the city proper would have then aquiring the power to match it before useage.
The plan went under fire in the early 90's when the population was declining (riots, earthquakes) but the dept stuck to it and acquired 50% ownership in two Utah coal power plants. Had a private firm been in change the plants would have never been bought and Enron would have the city shut down literally.
Freeman before he left had a solar program in place and wanted to create local gas power plants. I guess it would be powered with LNG. I don't think the plan went anywhere.
Just look at Los Angles and the rest of California. As far as their energy policy has gone, and it is as leftist as it gets, it's a failure.
They don't call it "metrofail" for nothing.
I have lived in Los Angeles for 28 years. Please help me understand exactly what I am supposed to be calling "metrofail". I have never heard the term before.
Also, please explain how CA's energy policy is "leftist". I too remember the tax payers of this state being ripped off royally by the free market forces of Enron.
Currently the rightist minority elements in Sacramento have an outrageous impact over the annual budget process, which requires a super majority, and appear to have successfully cut funding to much needed, energy efficient light rail, while continuing to fund freeway expansion. Not very leftist to me.
I have lived in Los Angeles for 28 years. Please help me understand exactly what I am supposed to be calling "metrofail". I have never heard the term before.
A. Do you remember Proposition AA on the November 1982 ballot and what they said the funds would do as far as metrofail?
B. Ridership is horrible. They promised us Metrofail would cure our traffic problems.
C. Unless you're a shut-in and don't get out, do you dare argue that the traffic has gotten horribly worse the last few years?
Also, please explain how CA's energy policy is "leftist". I too remember the tax payers of this state being ripped off royally by the free market forces of Enron.
Uhm...are you sure you lived in Cal as long as you said you did? I lived there 44 years and STILL work there 8 months out of the year.
Currently the rightist minority elements in Sacramento have an outrageous impact over the annual budget process, which requires a super majority, and appear to have successfully cut funding to much needed, energy efficient light rail, while continuing to fund freeway expansion. Not very leftist to me.
Actually it has been AG Brown who has stopped any new construction desigend to alleviate the traffic problems which wasted untold millions of gasonline and pollute the air.
Brown, who was also the former governor, is a hard-core leftist enviromentalist.
So all of Arnolds bonds which passed last November have been for naught as far as fixing the roads and building new ones.
Oh yeah, Arnold, the "green" governor, stopped a Ligth-rail project from getting on the ballot.
You gotta love that one.
You mean to say there are parts of L.A. that have not been paved over yet? If highways, byways, overpasses, and concrete were the answer to traffic problems, then L.A. would be heaven on earth. I drove in L.A. as far back as 1977; it was hell on earth then and it dominated by freeways even then. You say it's gotten horrible in the last few years? Try the last 40 years.
Maybe Brown is stopping new construction because he knows how futile that is. Denver, where I live, just spent billions on a new, improved interstate system through downtown. Yeh, things are just rosy there now and all problems are solved. To their credit, they have been doing a fairly good job expanding their light rail which does, in fact, make it easier to get to and from downtown and will be even better in the future.
If you want to build a transit system that is utilized it is counterproductive to make auto travel easier simultaneously. As far as burning fuel stuck in traffic goes, this can and will be solved by the widespread implemenation of hybrid vehicles with start/stop mode.
Taking the long view, at some point you just have to stop building more and "better" roads. All you do is create a hopeless treadmill. Besides, we're supposed to be running out of oil. And your solution is to create more demand for oil.
And why are you complaining about Arnold. So, he's not really all that green is he. You should be happy. Arnold's solution to global warming is to build the hydrogen highway. Please!! And he would be traveling that hydrogen highway with his Hummer yet. Yes, you should be happy. Arnold is not the hard core, left wing environmentalist you seem to detest so much.
Your solution to the hole L.A. and much of the rest of the country is in is to build a bigger hole. With taxpayer money, of course, even though you are mister conservative.
I think there is a basic conflict between having a great or even good mass transit system and a road system which has lots of excess capacity. As soon as the transit system starts to meaningfully take the load off the road system, then people tend to gravitate back to the road system. Let those who choose to do so, drive through hell every day, but provide them an alternative.
I nominally lived in the Peoples Republik of Kalifornia from about 1968 to 2002. To go any further left you would be talking Khmer Rouge or something like that.
Los Angeles isn't as "leftist" as it gets.
LA has cars cars cars and zillions of roads.
Europe has much more rail investment and it is actually quite successful. Are they full of super-humans? No, same sort of people.
Like the corrput government we have, as exemplified by this failed de-energy bill, has a solution?
This again is the right winger's non answer: "destroy and thwart everything the government does because it's intrinsically bad."
The alternative is to insist on less corrupt and effective programs with significant impact.