107 comments on EROEI Short #3: Price-Estimated EROEI
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
107 comments on EROEI Short #3: Price-Estimated EROEI
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Pessimism of the Intellect; Optimism of the Will.”
—Antonio Gramsci
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I asked the following question a few months ago:
I used this analogy in regard to the Texas oil production peak and decline. From 1972 to 1981, nominal oil prices went up by about 1,000% and the industry responded with the biggest drilling boom in history, which resulted in a decline in production from 3.5 mbpd in 1972 to 2.5 mbpd in 1982.
In other words, how fast did Texas have to drill in order to keep oil production rising? The answer is that it appears to be physically impossible.
We have seen a similar situation in the North Sea, where we have seen a crude oil production decline rate of about 5% per year since 1999 while oil prices have increased at about 18% per year.
IMO, Saudi Arabia--which is currently showing lower crude oil production in response to higher oil prices and increased drilling activity--is at about the same stage of depletion as Texas in the Seventies.
While we can make money finding smaller oil fields, the case histories and mathematical models suggest that we will not be able to increase our aggregate conventional oil production, i.e., the function of oil companies in post-peak regions is to slow the rate of decline.
So, an interesting question would be to determine what energy sources will show increasing flow rates of net energy, with more investment.
BTW, in my opinion, we are looking at years, probably decades, declining aggregate net energy flow rates, until such time that the rate of increase in alternative/non-conventional energy production equals the rate of decline (BTU's per year) in conventional energy production.
Well Uranium Mining looks pretty good.
Rio Tinto plans to double output over the next decade
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/08/05/business/sxrio.php
BHP-Billiton will triple output from Olympic Dam
http://odx.bhpbilliton.com/expansion/index.asp
Just for a start.