167 comments on The Economics of Oil, Part II: Peak Oil and the Energy Supply Curve
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
167 comments on The Economics of Oil, Part II: Peak Oil and the Energy Supply Curve
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
- An interview with Stoneleigh - the case for deflation
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.”
—Richard Feynman
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
We can only adapt to things to which our physical existence gives possibilities to. No amount of economic modeling can know this. Only physics can and even that very roughly/approximately.
As for Mexico, oil exports are c. 20% of their export revenue. As such, the fall in exports is probably not critical on its own, but there are another factors:
RISK = Lost oil exports + Increased oil imports * increasing oil price + supply risk (i.e. delivery disruptions in imports)
This combination may be harder to stomach for Mexico at least temporally as it is not just a mere price hike.
Time will tell though. I hope that Mexico will weather this well, but I'm not counting on it.
This is, I think, the exact problem with the analysis above. It is based on a model which does, to a great degree, reflect the economic processes involved.
HOWEVER - after having said this...
Your first assumption is that the oil market is a "free" market. This changed at the latest in the 1970s after production in the US peaked. National oil companies now account for 80% of production!!!
Are they going to react free-market rationally to make sure that production drops are gradual? OPEC did the exact oposite at the end of the 1970s, if I may just offer one small case in point.
I missed the part of the essay which acounts for W*A*R, natural catastrophy and other "minor" disruptions which can and will change the world over night.
And who is going to garantee me that I'll get my petrol when I need it??
I have no problem with steadily rising prices when I can the act accordingly - and *rationally* by conservation etc.. What will more than likely happen is that I wake up in the morning and find out that the local gas station won't be able to fill my tank on that day - just because some tanker riffed somewhere between here and Nigeria, ie a very tight supply chain snaps. What to do? Jump into the non-existent public transport? Buy a house in town that I can't afford and won't be finanzed for anyway?
Post Peak will hurt, despite all signs at the moment of a relatively funtioning transition.
Next objection:
Living in Germany, I would agree from experience on the fact that higher prices influence consumption. This ASSUMES however, that these prices happen gradually. Petrol was extremely expensive here 16 years ago when I came - and since then it has gotten much more expensive. No problem, we all had time to adjust. What would we do if there were a sudden price spike - say doubling or trippling? Of course - change my lifestyle!! It's just too bad that this doesn't happen over night. Or how fast can you move out of the suburbs when everyone else wants to move out too? House, kids, mortgage to the hilt, job too far away, public transport (which I already use, by the way) which is already a pain in the gazoo.
Cheers from Munich,
Dom
----------------------
Just remember the Golden Years, all you at the top!