Chris, thanks for the "plug".

I've thought about rationing for a number of years, but not in a serious fashion. I still have a lot to learn on the subject, even though, as an engineer, I've been concerned about energy issues for more than 35 years. For example, I was unaware that the U.S. had a Standby Gasoline Rationing Plan in place since 1980. Here's a link:

http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/12000/12200/12291/12291.pdf

Or, one can go back to King Hubbert's early works with the Technocrats:

http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/hubecon.htm
http://www.technocracy.ca/simp/man-hours-distribution.html

Here's another article on "Energy Certificates" from the Technocratic Society--dated 1938: Note that this was a time before Socialism and other utopian economic systems had taken on the negative connotations found in today's neocon world:

http://www.technocracy.org/Archives/The%20Energy%20Certificate-r.htm

One obvious sticking point is the distribution to various industries, where some energy intensive industries, such as primary metals, might find it difficult to produce their products if their consumption was directly rationed according to some formula. Distributing the rations to the final consumer, i.e., the people, makes it possible to link the consumption of all of industry's energy directly to the final demand.

Every day, people make many billions of decisions about consuming energy, but they may not be aware that they are doing so. Everything we do, from the time the alarm clock rings until we turn out the lights at bed time involves decisions involving the use of energy. Even during our sleep, our machines provide electricity or heat to keep us comfortable. The energy tax approach buries the tax in the overall price. A tax based "ration by price" system would continue to hide the real energy consumption impact of these activities from the individual, as the resulting increase in taxes would be added to all other costs to calculate a price at the final point of sales. If folks really understood what these choices meant in terms of energy consumption, I can only hope that they would act to reduce their individual use of fossil fuels (or carbon) and change their way of living for a healthier Earth.

E. Swanson

Here is one of the coupons that Phil Sharp spoke of burning during the Reagan administration. I'm not sure if the plan you linked to is the same but I think it is. The rations were printed but not used. As you can see, these are not tradable rations because they are tied to the licence plate number. Here is the wiki on the 73 crisis.

Chris

"One obvious sticking point is the distribution to various industries, where some energy intensive industries, such as primary metals, might find it difficult to produce their products if their consumption was directly rationed according to some formula."

I commend to you the information available at www.teqs.net . I enjoyed your comments linked to through mdsolar's article, and think that you would find the resolution of the above important issue there. If you have any further comments to add on it the newly-launched forum there will provide you with quick access to the TEQs team.