A couple of points:

an alleged record federal budget surplus ($13.8 billion).

Nobody's alleging that, since it's well-known that the budget surplus 2000/2001 was significantly higher ($18B).

Big Oil has launched the first lawsuit against Canada under NAFTA law

That's not at all the first NAFTA lawsuit against a part of Canada; see, for example, this NAFTA lawsuit by UPS against the Canadian government.

inflation stops dead in its tracks.

Inflation and having a federal debt are very different things, and getting rid of the latter will do very little to the former.

Inflation and having a federal debt are very different things, and getting rid of the latter will do very little to the former.

On some definitions, inflation is a measurement of change of accumulated federal debt. Thus, it is a direct measurement of anual debit.

And on all definitions, federal debt sooner or later reflect on inflation. Of course, the governement can make it be later, increasing interest rates for a while.

On some definitions, inflation is a measurement of change of accumulated federal debt.

Could you link to such a definition? I've never seen anything even remotely similar.

The most common definition is similar to this one: "Inflation is a general increase in prices across the economy over a period of time."

And on all definitions, federal debt sooner or later reflect on inflation.

Could you please provide some evidence for this claim? Because it doesn't seem to fit reality; Canada had incredibly low inflation during the early 90's (link), which was precisely when its debt was highest.

So the available evidence disagrees with you.

I would define inflation as an increase in the money supply relative to available goods and services. Price increases are a only symptom of too much money chasing too few goods and services.

During the recent expansionary years, we have seen large asset price increases as a result of the money supply increasing, but monetary expansion has not ignited a wage-price spiral as it normally would due to downward pressure on wages from international wage arbitrage and downward pressure on prices from globalized trade.

Nope, That’s Not Money

Prudent Bear’s Doug Noland has for years been pointing out that one of the drivers of the credit bubble has been the ever-broadening definition of money. As the global economy expanded without a hic-up, more and more instruments came to be used as a store of value or medium of exchange or even a standard against which to value other things—in other words, as money. Thus mortgage-backed bonds and even more exotic things came to be seen as nearly risk-free and infinitely liquid. In Noland’s terms, credit gained “moneyness,” which sent the effective global money supply through the roof. This in turn allowed the U.S. and its trading partners to keep adding jobs and appearing to grow, despite debt levels that were rising into the stratosphere. For a while there, borrowing actually made the world richer, because both the cash received and the debt created functioned as money.

What is beginning to happen now is the converse - the definition of 'money' is tightening, as confidence in exotic credit instruments created through financial alchemy is ebbing quickly. The result is a reduction in the effective money supply, which is leading inexorably towards a very painful credit crunch. We cover this progression at TOD:Canada twice a week.

With a few months of hindsight, it’s now clear that debt-as-money was not one of humanity’s better ideas. When the U.S. housing market—the source of all that mortgage-backed pseudo money—began to tank, hedge funds found out that an asset-backed bond wasn’t exactly the same thing as a stack of hundred dollar bills. The global economy then started taking inventory of what it was using as money. And it began crossing things off the list. Subprime ABS? Nope, that’s not money. BBB corporate bonds? Nope. High-grade corporates? Alas, no. Credit default swaps? Are you kidding me?

No longer able to function as money, these instruments are being “repriced” (a slick little euphemism for “dumped for whatever anyone will pay”), which is causing a cascade failure of the many business models that depend on infinite liquidity. The effective global money supply is contracting at a double-digit rate, reversing out much of the past decade’s growth.

Just as price increases eventually follow an increase in the money supply, price decreases (at least in nominal terms) will eventually follow a decrease in the money supply (deflation). Once all those fancy derivatives that make up such as large percentage of so many portfolios are actually marked to market rather than to model, then exactly such a downward readjustment of asset prices will occur over a relatively short space of time. A firesale by even one troubled institution can be enough to taint an entire asset class, with cascading effect.

But here’s where it gets really interesting. The reaction of the world’s central banks to the freezing-up of the leveraged speculating community has, predictably, been to create massive amounts of new fiat currency and hand it to the banking system. They’re not dropping twenties out of helicopters yet, but functionally it’s the same thing. By swapping dollars, euros and yen for no-longer-money bonds that are plunging in price, creating some paper profits where there once were catastrophic losses, the Bankers hope to revive the animal spirits of the leveraged speculators. Specifically, they hope to stop the financial community from going further down the moneyness checklist and eliminating any more instruments.

But you don’t forget a brush with death that easily. The process of debt reclassification has a momentum that a few hundred billion new dollars won’t stop.

Stoneleigh

thanks for you're careful explanation.I appreciate you'er
economic work here & as a newbie to such but discovering P.O. necessity i felt
i needed to study this area a lot[took control of my ira etc.
]
in the deflationary scene u & mish [mike shedrock], etc. envision i question if dollars[cash]would be king for more than a moment due to the dollar[us] dropping & our debt. & if the loonie et tu canada, then loonie's would fair some better but not as good as preps or other tangibles or pms.at least the loonie has reasources to support it. The US only has what's left of perception[ which subprime & helicopter drops are killing] & a what's left of saudi oil supremacy[which might be perception too].

swiss francs?

thanks, & again for you're contributions!

[having trouble w/ seeing text i'm typing w/ new system]

stoneleigh or others

Can We Have Inflation And Deflation All At The Same Time?

-- Posted Friday, 28 September 2007 | Digg This ArticleDigg It!

Copyright © 2007

A. E. Fekete

http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1190991990.php

above my ability to analyse. comments.

one more thought. In stuart's recent thread
he quoted Krugman re some saying essentiallythe runs on the banks were the clincher in the great depression. i know the old timers refer to this the most
[few i know had stocks].It hit virtually everyone.

today a loss in home value, retirement fund down significantly, with a few bank runs[countrywide had a run in calif.] would again hit virtually everyone.

I actually think the US dollar is bottoming and a reversal may soon be on the cards. Everyone is bearish on the dollar, which is a signal that the trend has gone about as far as it's going to for now. The best bets are generally those made against the herd when the herd is nearly unanimous.

As for why such a thing should happen, I am expecting credit spreads to widen dramatically in order to reflect increased risk perception - that is the interest premium over treasuries paid on other forms of riskier debt should get larger. Money should flow into short term treasuries on a flight to quality, and away from perceived risk.

The value of the dollar needs to be compared against domestic goods and services, against which it should go up very significantly in a deflation when a firesale of assets is being conducted. It also needs to be compared to other currencies, where it could go up against some and down against others depending on which currency is deflating faster. (The problem is that there is no fixed point against which all other things can be valued.) I would expect both the dollar and the yen to rise relative to other currencies (the yen due to the unwinding of the carry trade), although the situation is likely to remain complex and fluid.