251 comments on Review: How Can We Outlive Our Way of Life?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
251 comments on Review: How Can We Outlive Our Way of Life?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.”
—Richard Feynman
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Fuhgeddaboudit.
People have been fantasizing about beta-ray batteries of various sorts for decades, with minimal practical effect. I would even speculate that there might be a 1950s or 1960s Popular Science article on the subject. Tritium is used in small lights for remote airfields and for gunsights, but that's about it. It is, however, theoretically possible to make a tritium battery, which is more than can be said for the various perpetual motion scams.
But no jurisdiction is going to allow any ordinary consumer to own enough tritium to power a laptop for 30 years irrespective of how it's packaged. Even tiny lights containing a minute speck are illegal in many localities, as 'frivolous use' of radioactive material. In addition, you have to consider the destructive effect of even low energy beta radiation on semiconductor junctions, and the woeful inefficiency of a semiconductor junction in harvesting the collisional energy. In addition to that, you have to consider that there are no tritium mines - the stuff is in short supply and made using neutrons from nuclear reactors.
So there may be limited military uses, but anybody who thinks this will be in laptops on store shelves in two or three years is full of baloney. Indeed, as the notion of finite fossil fuel supplies takes wider hold throughout this wicked world, we shall suffocate under ever larger piles of baloney. One way of sorting this out, oftentimes, is to go through the motions of trying to buy engineering samples. For example, A123 will happily sell sample nanophosphate lithium batteries. They're real. But you can't order sample beta batteries, Steorn devices, or zero point energy sources. There's a reason for that.
Oh, and did I ever mention that too many reporters went into their field because it can be one of the most effortless ways to slide through college? So whenever you see a report of pie in the sky, take it with a grain of salt - or, better yet, the whole salt shaker. It might conceivably be true, but what are the odds? Especially when it's an anonymous web report with no one taking responsibility in a byline.
As the man says ... Fuhgeddaboudit!
There is around 3.6kg of naturally occuring tritium in the world, spread evenly around the world!
Manmade tritium? ... around 30kg ...cost? ... ~ $200,000,000 per kilo!
See
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2806
Xeroid.
It says that tritium is a BYPRODUCT, not a requirement for the battery.