![]() | An insight on US strategic thinking - why so much cowering fear? | The Oil Drum: Europe | Even CATO libertarians say energy deregulation does not work | ![]() |
38 comments on The UK Energy White Paper: An Academic Critique
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
38 comments on The UK Energy White Paper: An Academic Critique
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Blogroll
- ASPO The official site of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas.
- Energy Bulletin Clearing house for news regarding the peak in global energy supply.
- PowerSwitch Dedicated to raising awareness & discussion of the impending & permanent decline of cheap oil & gas supply.
- ODAC Oil Depletion Analysis Centre working to raise awareness and promote better understanding of the world's oil-depletion problem.
- Global Public Media Public service broadcasting for a post carbon world.
- Post Carbon Institute Learning to live in a low energy world.
- PeakOil.com US site and forum to educate and promote awareness of global hydrocarbon depletion.
- FEASTA The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability
- Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) This website describes an effective and fair response both to climate change and oil/gas depletion
- Aleklett's Energy Mix Global Energy Systems, Peak Oil, etc
Other Blogs
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
The oil and gas might be on their way out but no one is considering CCS for these. CCS is only about coal and while reserves are likely to be smaller than conventionally assumed and regional distributions are going to be the key determinant to global rates of use, there is certainly more carbon available than we want to emit into the atmosphere. Hence the interest in CCS.
Underground coal gasification (UCG) is a technology that could be very useful for UK, given that UK has a lot of coal reserves that cannot be easily reached by conventional mining. CCS would be a necessary adjunct to such a technology, and UCG and CCS could have useful synergies.
More information can be found on www.ucgp.com. From the site:
“…..UCG in combination with CCS is recognised as a potential route to carbon abatement from coal. Reports suggest that UCG in combination with CO2 injection into adjacent coal seams to enhance coal bed methane (ECBM) is a potentially attractive option, particularly under river estuaries near-shore and eventually offshore coal.
UCG has synergies which may be important to CCS. First and foremost it is a gasification technology with all the benefits that accrue in terms of CO2 capture from pre-combustion gas. These include smaller more efficient separation plant, lower capture costs and the ability to produce hydrogen in bulk quantities. Furthermore, the composition of UCG clean gas, and the high pressure available, suggests that a range of CO2 capture options could be considered.
The scope for optimising the capture process is considerable and emissions already low for coal can be reduced by partial CO2 capture, to those of natural gas combined cycle (CCGT) or taken to a level approaching renewable energy. The process is particularly well suited to the production of low carbon gas mixtures of hydrogen and methane. These have higher energy densities and are safer to handle than pure hydrogen. Such mixtures may be suitable for existing gas transmission lines and could make an effective transport fuel for some vehicles…..”
Here are some non-synergies.
1) the UCG part of the coal basin is porous but the CCS part is non-leaky, or
2) UCG and CCS are in different basins.
Personally I'm pleased that early results show this could be a dud. Think of coal as pre-sequestered carbon.