![]() | The Energy and Environment Round-Up: October 14th 2007 | The Oil Drum: Canada | Canadian Gas - Decline Sets in. | ![]() |
434 comments on World Energy and Population: Trends to 2100
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
434 comments on World Energy and Population: Trends to 2100
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Blogroll
- 321 Energy
- The Archdruid Report
- ASPO Canada
- Ali Samsam Bakhtiari
- The Sir Robert Bond Papers
- Briarpatch Magazine
- Chatham House
- Paul Chefurka
- The Council of Canadians
- The Daily Canuck
- The Daily Reckoning
- The Dominion
- Energy and Capital
- Energy Bulletin
- Feasta
- Financial Sense
- Global Public Media
- Graphoilogy
- The Garret Hardin Society
- Richard Heinberg
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- iTulip
- James Kunstler
- LATOC
- Darryl McMahon
- George Monbiot
- Murky View
- Dmitri Orlov
- Plants for a Future
- Raise the Hammer
- Ramsay House Project
- Rigzone Canada
- R-Squared
- Nouriel Roubini
- Safe Haven
- Shack in the Middle
- Michael Shedlock
- Treehugger
- The Tyee
- Jeff Vail
- Vive le Canada
- John Warnock
- Whiskey and Gunpowder
User login
Archives
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.



So let's all hope settlement is in sight before matters get far worse. If you want to get an idea of far worse read World Energy and Population: Trends to 2100.
We support nuclear electric power for our Persian friends as part of settlement of these unfortunate matters because without nuclear power lots of Persians will likely face starvation in the dark and cold.
http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/nsalawsuit/nsalawsuit.htm#zavitz
I would suggest Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) instead. Faster, cheaper (assuming doing your own enrichment), better in the desert.
So much less controversial.