![]() | Daily As-Yet-Unnamed-Set-Of-Links - Tuesday October 23 2007 | TOD: Australia/New Zealand | The Bullroarer - Thursday 25 October 2007 | ![]() |
7 comments on The Bullroarer - Wednesday 24 October 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
7 comments on The Bullroarer - Wednesday 24 October 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
User login
Contact
- anz at theoildrum dot com
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
geonic
Congratulations to the founders of Bullroarer.Interesting how a few oblique references to Peak Oil are appearing in the media. Heard it mentioned twice on the ABC yesterday.
However there is a very long way to go-one can only hope that unfolding events lead to a more rapid wake-up by the public (us) and our Revered Leaders (?)
There's more chance our leaders will wake up when we have a change of leaders.
Feel free to post links to anything mentioning peak oil that you come across - I don't have the bandwidth to scan every last media source in the region...
The Greens here in Aus know what's happening.
Check out:
http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/senate/commttee/S9230.pdf
The entire inquiry can be found here: http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/rrat_ctte/oil_supply/index.htm
And the recommendations are here: http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/rrat_ctte/oil_supply/report/a03.h...
If anybody is going to lobby poli's the ones who were in attendance for this committee might be a good place to start. Although I suppose we'll have to see what happens at the election...
Here's ASPO Australia's press release in response. http://www.aspo-australia.org.au/media/News_release0207.doc
My fear is that this Senate report will be tabled and then gather dust, like the Hirsch report did in the US. There is an interesting quote in the Hansard where Senator Milne states the conundrum that I think all politicians who are aware of the problem have to ponder;
-----
Senator MILNE—This is the crux of the political dilemma: there is hardly a politician alive who is going to go out and say to people with rising oil prices, ‘We’re going to take away the subsidies.’ The popular response is to promise to give more subsidies going into an election—to subsidise more exploration, to subsidise this, to subsidise that, to maintain the diesel fuel rebate, to subsidise petrol prices. Just last year in the Senate there was a proposal to subsidise petrol at the time that the price was going up. Is it an appropriate response to maintain these subsidies? If it is not, what is the appropriate response?
-----
In the Senate Hansard on 8th Feb they do not even bother to count the votes as the legislation goes down in flames on the Senate floor.
http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/work/journals/jnlp_129.pdf
ENVIRONMENT.OIL DEPLETION PROTOCOL Senator Milne, pursuant to notice of motion not objected to as a formal motion, moved general business notice of motion no. 700.That the Senate.
(a) notes:
(i) that the Marrickville Council in Sydney has adopted the Oil Depletion Protocol which seeks to address the impact of peak oil by steadily reducing oil usage, and
(ii) the council will reduce its oil usage by 3 per cent per year; and
(b) calls on the Government:
(i) to adopt the Oil Depletion Protocol to reduce Australia.s dependence on oil and ensure an orderly restructure of the economy and society for the post-oil era, and
(ii) encourage state and local governments to adopt the protocol and reduce oil usage.
Question put and negatived.