151 comments on Clinton's New Energy and Climate Policy
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
151 comments on Clinton's New Energy and Climate Policy
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Most people spend more time and energy going around problems than in trying to solve them.”
—Henry Ford
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Presumably PV means personal vehicles.
The great majority of strip mall stores that aren't money laundromats are tax dodges. Like the lawyers or whatever that set their kids or wives up in a cookie business that makes $3 a month in profit from the one non english speaking minimum wage employee but is good enough to write off the 60K monster SUV.
There is a reason many of these vehicles are so huge and have a 6201# GVWR. The tax code.
It would take a forensic accountant 10 minutes to prove this if regulators would do their job. Hard to see from ivory towers.
I thought PV stood for photovoltaics. We wouldn't wanted businesses generating their own clean electricity.
RobertInTucson
I haven't escaped from reality. I have a daypass.
My line of thought was that if it were photovoltaics and the business were legit, then it would be viewed as a good thing and it wouldn't make sense to repeal the tax credit.
I know for a fact that people use these tax dodges in vast quantities and it is one of the reasons why the super heavy vehicles are so popular. They can be depreciated much quicker then lighter vehicles. If this tax credit is repealed the number of oversized vehicles would fall like a rock. The tax code drives a lot of what appears irrational.
If you add the millions of one person LLC's that write all these vehicles off, you could get rid of them in very short order.
I guess we need to wait for clarification.
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p946/ch02.html#d0e2211
you cannot elect the section 179 deduction for the following property.
Equipment that uses solar energy to generate electricity, to heat or cool a structure, to provide hot water for use in a structure, or to provide solar process heat, except for equipment used to generate energy to heat a swimming pool.
Thus you can not write down PV in one year, unlike other items.