40 comments on Empirical Relationships Between Reserves and Production Rates
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
40 comments on Empirical Relationships Between Reserves and Production Rates
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Of all races in an advanced stage of civilization, the American is the least accessible to long views… Always and everywhere in a hurry to get rich, he does not give a thought to remote consequences; he sees only present advantages… He does not remember, he does not feel, he lives in a materialist dream.”
—Moiseide Ostrogorski (1902, 302-303)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Khebab - I've been doing a bit of frantic reading around this and a couple of points. The first is that in their official press release Petrobras refer to an area called Tupi that may conatin this amount of oil. It does not seem to be a single pool.
And when they say they hope to produce at 100,000 bpd by 2010 or 2011 - this is a very optimistic time line, but not impossible since this will be produced from a floating production system. These are often used to conduct extended well tests - and so it is possible they are thinking of using exisiting equipment to conduct long tests on a small number of wells - this would provide a lot of valuable information on reservoir volume, connectivity and performance. They can add more production later by adding more ships.
Some other points. This is in 1500 to 3000 m of water. I think Petrobras currently operate up to 1000 m - so this is pushing the envelope into new engineering territory. But Petrobras are word leaders at doing this.
They also say this is light oil - at 28 API this is not light but intermediate crude. It is lighter I believe than the other oil they produce.
2006 Brazil produced 1.8 mmbpd and consumed 2.1 mmbpd -so this should help them atain and maintain self sufficiency.
I agree, it's probably too early to know the impact of this discovery. We don't even know the Oil&Gas ratio yet (recoverable volumes are given in BOE).
Is "hacking" a new type of mathematical operation? Har Har.
I think it seems obvious he meant the Richard Stallman definition of hacking
That is what I get from their press releases too. Brazilian oil is heavy to the point that we mostly don't refine it, we sell and buy light oil. That field seem to have the lightest oil of Brazil.
Also:
Brazilian governemnt is always optimist when talking about energy.
Very interesting post, Khebab, that opens a can of worms.
I suspect that Brazil's 'recoverable' reserves are closer to OIIP than to proved. This appears to be the trend nowadays. OIIP is a constant, being fairly easy to measure. The percentage recovered over time is a variable so URR must be a variable. A bit of equation abuse gives:
V(URR) = K(OIIP) * V(R%)
New discoveries and the expected flow rates are being inflated by publishing OIIP instead of proved. They are the asymptote to which URR will approach but never reach.
The other equation is what Saudi Arabia uses when they talk about their reserves. I call this the lawyers' definition:
Reserves = OIIP - Produced
New oil discoveries are being overstated on the old basis and there won't be any reserve growth. Things are even worse than they look.