That’s really good Memmel, a big help to me. Yes at heart Gaussian because of a) geology, b) nevertheless a sort of constancy in discovery, production, etc. etc. and c) Gaussian-like is often what you get or see when you sum huge amounts of data and don’t really know where you are at. So it is Gaussian in theory ..only.

But if one thinks about the upslope, and sees it in terms of processes that create growth (here, roughly, rate/efficiency of extraction), rather than the static compilation of measurement y of element x, it becomes an upsweep and one indeed then expects a shark fin curve. Its really neat, because well known shark fins include the pop/territory of empires. (see link, it is just one paper off the top of google..) Think of the territory of the British Empire: steep and straight up and then down the same way. Businesses are often shark fins as well. And the oil industry has many similarities to both those.

Extrapolating wildly, or being very fanciful, one might say that the US, through its imperial actions - soft control, culture, ideology, influence, manipulation, control thru superiority /threat (plus finance), has acted to avoid the pitfalls of Britain and say Rome, the shark fin curve, and has failed thru its reliance on resources and that *in fine* the result is the same.

(I’m not forgetting the Vietnam war, all this is just as viewed from one angle..)

The Afgh and Iraq invasions would then represent a return to an older model, incongruent and clumsy for the US - they can’t hold the territory and never really wished to (democracy, new leaders, the free market, domino effect and all that jazz..) because the supreme importance of ‘oil’ has made it into a ‘commodity’ divorced from just about everything else.

http://www.irows.ucr.edu/papers/irows22/irows22.htm

And the US and North Sea which show gentler decline rates are not odd balls. Investment and technological adoption in the US has been huge same for the North Sea. One thing I've not seen is a graph of investment in the US. I have seen some plots of the well drilled in the US and its still incredible.

http://www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/403270385.shtml

HL in effect assumes business as usual and in the US the drilling campaign has even been increasing somewhat. The key is that backing the US decline rate is a heroic drilling campaign with thousands of stripper wells.

I found this graph for a few North Sea fields.
http://www.energybulletin.net/17262.html

Pretty close to a perfect shark fin and you can see the return to a guassian.

On the other end of the spectrum we have Russia that has generally been pretty constant with technology.

Sort of a tortoise vs the hare race.

Russia is now the worlds top oil producer.

For the US an imperial strategy is really dumb. We gain little in the way of resources.

We would be far better off exerting effort to develop technologies that remove our dependence on the very resources we are supposedly in the Middle East to protect.

I guess I'm stating the obvious. But this is not obvious to a lot of people in Washington DC.