40 comments on Empirical Relationships Between Reserves and Production Rates
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
40 comments on Empirical Relationships Between Reserves and Production Rates
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Of all races in an advanced stage of civilization, the American is the least accessible to long views… Always and everywhere in a hurry to get rich, he does not give a thought to remote consequences; he sees only present advantages… He does not remember, he does not feel, he lives in a materialist dream.”
—Moiseide Ostrogorski (1902, 302-303)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
That’s really good Memmel, a big help to me. Yes at heart Gaussian because of a) geology, b) nevertheless a sort of constancy in discovery, production, etc. etc. and c) Gaussian-like is often what you get or see when you sum huge amounts of data and don’t really know where you are at. So it is Gaussian in theory ..only.
But if one thinks about the upslope, and sees it in terms of processes that create growth (here, roughly, rate/efficiency of extraction), rather than the static compilation of measurement y of element x, it becomes an upsweep and one indeed then expects a shark fin curve. Its really neat, because well known shark fins include the pop/territory of empires. (see link, it is just one paper off the top of google..) Think of the territory of the British Empire: steep and straight up and then down the same way. Businesses are often shark fins as well. And the oil industry has many similarities to both those.
Extrapolating wildly, or being very fanciful, one might say that the US, through its imperial actions - soft control, culture, ideology, influence, manipulation, control thru superiority /threat (plus finance), has acted to avoid the pitfalls of Britain and say Rome, the shark fin curve, and has failed thru its reliance on resources and that *in fine* the result is the same.
(I’m not forgetting the Vietnam war, all this is just as viewed from one angle..)
The Afgh and Iraq invasions would then represent a return to an older model, incongruent and clumsy for the US - they can’t hold the territory and never really wished to (democracy, new leaders, the free market, domino effect and all that jazz..) because the supreme importance of ‘oil’ has made it into a ‘commodity’ divorced from just about everything else.
http://www.irows.ucr.edu/papers/irows22/irows22.htm
And the US and North Sea which show gentler decline rates are not odd balls. Investment and technological adoption in the US has been huge same for the North Sea. One thing I've not seen is a graph of investment in the US. I have seen some plots of the well drilled in the US and its still incredible.
http://www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/403270385.shtml
HL in effect assumes business as usual and in the US the drilling campaign has even been increasing somewhat. The key is that backing the US decline rate is a heroic drilling campaign with thousands of stripper wells.
I found this graph for a few North Sea fields.
http://www.energybulletin.net/17262.html
Pretty close to a perfect shark fin and you can see the return to a guassian.
On the other end of the spectrum we have Russia that has generally been pretty constant with technology.
Sort of a tortoise vs the hare race.
Russia is now the worlds top oil producer.
For the US an imperial strategy is really dumb. We gain little in the way of resources.
We would be far better off exerting effort to develop technologies that remove our dependence on the very resources we are supposedly in the Middle East to protect.
I guess I'm stating the obvious. But this is not obvious to a lot of people in Washington DC.