It's not just a problem at the post office, government, and business, but you may as well add academia to the list.

Never mind the details, suffice it to say that in my department, my mention of peak oil was scoffed at a year ago. Even lately, as I've mentioned again, the response is blank stares.

Smart people look the same as deer in the headlights given information outside their 'domain' of expertise.

Lovelock's analogy comes to mind...

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/16956300/the_prophet_of_clima...

As we weave our way through the tourists heading up to the castle, it's easy to look at them and feel sadness. It?s harder to look at them and feel hopeful. But when I say this to Lovelock, he argues that the human race has gone through many bottlenecks before --and perhaps we're the better for it. Then he tells me the story of an airplane crash years ago at Manchester Airport. "A fuel tank caught fire during takeoff," Lovelock says. "There was plenty of time for everybody to get out, but many of the passengers wouldn't move. They just stayed there in their seats as they were told to, and the people who escaped had to climb over them to get out. It was perfectly obvious how to get out, but they wouldn't move. They died from the smoke or burned to death. And an awful lot of people, I'm sad to say, are like that. And that's what will happen this time, except on a much vaster scale."

Never mind the details, suffice it to say that in my department, my mention of peak oil was scoffed at a year ago. Even lately, as I've mentioned again, the response is blank stares.

I actually had a real success yesterday. I took one of my former colleagues out to lunch and we had a nice chit chat about this and that. We talked about blogging and I showed him my energy blog and asked him if he had ever heard of peak oil. Vaguely he said he had. I then gave him a whirlwind tour of the topic in 30 minutes. I capped it off with the export land model as I understand it and before I was 2 minutes into the explanation he interrupted and said: "... that means that the declines for us would be experienced faster than a geological peak." He completely understood.

I showed him TOD and he started clicking through Stuart's or Khebab's recent posts about production ... intensely looking at the graphs. I mentioned ELP, he got it too. He said "Send me the TOD link."

I also mentioned doomer pr0n and cornucopians ... "where do you sit?" I told him on the fence!

What does your former colleague do for a living?

There was plenty of time for everybody to get out, but many of the passengers wouldn't move.

Lovelock often makes a creative interpretation of the facts to support his theories, but this time what he says is a mockery of the truth.

The fuel-fed fire rapidly developed to engulf the left wing by the time the plane had come to a stop, and smoke quickly spread into the passenger compartment. There were problems opening exit hatches, during the delay many passengers were overcome by smoke. Other passengers pushing to get out blocked aisles and exit ways. In later years, some survivors admitted they pushed passengers out of the way, climbing over them in a desperate scramble to escape. With a cabin filled with dense toxic smoke, it is certainly not obvious how to get out.

The passengers were only told to remain seated while the place was still moving, and before the crew realised the extent of the fire and the need to evacuate. As soon as it came to a stop, they were told to evacuate.

In short, there was very little time to get out, and if anything there was an unruly scramble. The idea that passengers sat passively as they were told and therefore died is complete rubbish. This is the complete opposite of what Lovelock claims.

dupe