134 comments on Home Heating in the USA: A Comparison of Forests with Fossil Fuels
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
134 comments on Home Heating in the USA: A Comparison of Forests with Fossil Fuels
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
The contents below are paid advertisements. Their appearance does not imply an endorsement by The Oil Drum.
“Any coward can fight a battle when he's sure of winning, but give me the man who has pluck to fight when he's sure of losing. That's my way, sir; and there are many victories worse than a defeat.”
—George Eliot
Search The Oil Drum with Google
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
- Enjoying Life Close to Home: Fun Streets
TOD:Europe
- UK Energy Flow Chart 2007
- Brown pretends to be tough on Russia
- Russian gas and European energy security - a reprise
TOD:Canada
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
- Weekend Energy Listening: Wind Power with Paul Gipe
TOD:ANZ
Peak Oil Primers
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- Ecological Economics
- David Strahan
- Econbrowser
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- Environmental Economics
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Organizations
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.






GAIA Host Collective
Nate,
Sorry to see that you still have OLD information. I thought from the title we would be treated to a revised and update article.
How about in your next update you include some of the new technology in wood burning. Start your re-education here:
Burn it Smart!
http://www.ec.gc.ca/cleanair-airpur/Campagne_chauffage_au_bois-WS69573E1...
The videos are very good:
Harvesting:
Firewood, from the Forest to the Shed. Note John address the issue of softwoods vs. hardwoods.
How to light and operate a woodstove.
Note the woodstove is being fueled with Poplar. They also address the pollution issue.
Advanced Woodstove Technology.
Note the side-by-side operational comparison between old tech and new tech wood stove.
-- Brandy
I'll check it out - though wood burning, unless done by a city, like Burlington, can only be done by a small % of population that don't live in concentrated areas. Id have to do a study on that but clearly everyone in Boston and NYC cant use those woodstoves. But people who do burn wood would benefit from the newer technologies for sure - my fireplace is probably only 20-25% efficient (Im serious). On the to-do list for next year.
Thanks for the link - I'll try and incorporate that in next iteration, though I expect to be working on the demand side for the next good while (except for some almost finished EROI stuff)
Nate,
When asked about wood burning I first ask how much sweat are they willing to put in. Do they want a fire to look at or to keep warm with.
Then my recommendations are:
* Gas fireplace insert, or zero clearance FP install.
* Wood pellets if they have the storage.
That takes care of 98% of the people who ask.
* Then cordwood and what type of stove.
In the last few years I have been getting my firewood from the local "suburban" forrest. There are many mature trees being removed and storm damage trees that would just go for waste that can be used for cordwood. This last season the local arborist would drop off a tree about every three weeks. These were only good clean burning trees. Very nice! I could not store all he had.
IF you live in New England here is a new product that is taking off like "wild fire": http://www.biopellet.net/
These are "BioBricks" basicly wood pellets for a cordwood stove. They are suppose to be much better than the usual compressed logs.
And winter time smoke pollution has become a seriuos issue. If you follow the links back on my previous post you will see what Canada is doing. Since I live in the suburbs I try to make as little smoke as possible.
Since I converted my fireplace to woodstove insert I would never have another fireplace. If building a house I would use a freestanding woodstove. Go to the woodheat.org site or hearth.com there are number of papers there, some talk about fireplace efficiency, depending upon construction a fireplace can be a net heat LOSS.
-- Brandy
WRT woodstove technology, one thing that is absolutely essential, IMHO, is outside combustion air ducting. This increases efficiency substantially, because you are not pulling already-heated interior air into the woodstove for combustion. It is also hugely safer, because you virtually eliminate the danger of backdrafts and carbon monoxide.
It is surprising that some woodstoves STILL haven't incorporated this very simple feature, even at this late date.