247 comments on DrumBeat: December 20, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
247 comments on DrumBeat: December 20, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.”
—Gandhi
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
A rare MSM story on food price inflation...
Food prices soar in America: higher food prices, led by milk, are hitting consumers where it hurts - in the stomach.
Ahh, the perfect quote for encompassing the current quest for biofuels.
The "Peak Fruit-Loops" story at top is also interesting. Of course, the cost of any breakfast cereal is mostly packaging and marketing (and profit), so a doubling of price based on grain prices alone would seem unlikely. Fruit-Loops is oats and sugar, but nobody talks about oat prices here. So, for everybody's enlightenment, here is all the oat news you know you need now:
http://oatinsight.com/oatshome/archive_oatgeneral.html?table=news&w%5Bco...
Mr. Norris is described as "director of wealth management for Oakworth Capital Bank and food price guru." Which doesn't exactly sound like a minimum wage job. And he has to ration his kids to one glass of milk a day so he can keep driving?
Maybe Mr. Morris useta originate mortgages for Oakworth Bank.
Speaking of which...the economic news is not looking good today.
Bad news at Bear Stearns
Holiday Sales in U.S. Fall for Third Week After Winter Storms
Why the Fed has lost its mojo
I've done ZERO in-store shopping, and plan to keep it that way. I don't have time to go drive 30 minutes just to GET to the store, spend even more time there, and then spend another 30 minutes to drive home. That is a complete waste. I'll spend the $5 on shipping for each gift.
Ditto, except that I did go to a few small independent shops at my small town and buy some locally-made handcrafts. A much better choice than the Chinese-slave-labor-pollution-spewing-factory-made stuff at Sprawl-Mart!
The pattern in recent years is that the MSM report glowing sales around Thanksgiving. Evidently to attract advertisers. Then they tone down the sales forecast as Christmas approaches. After Christmas, the news is that sales were down or didn't keep pace with inflation. Being an atheist, it warms my heart to hear of another failed Christmas season.
I love Christmas! But what I love is the traditions, not the rampant consumerism.
All of our ornaments and stuff were hand me downs from family, or bought once and used for literally something like 20 years. The old records were taken out and played. We sang carols at school and at home and any other time a kid could be gotten to sing carols, which was pretty often, looking back. We made Christmas cookies.
A Christmas with togetherness and traditions and one present each is far far better than one with gobs of stuff in place of love.
And actually making presents rules. I once whittled a set of drumsticks for one of my younger sisters - sure a pair was maybe $3 in the store but I sure as hell didn't have the $3.
The only purchase that I have made is a new Gateway desktop computer for my wife. Her old HP finally gave up and croaked. Office Depot had the GW on sale for half of what I paid for mine about 18 months ago and mine has turned out to be a very good machine.
The grand kids will get cards with real cash in them. Everyone else will get a card...or coal and switches. :)
Hi River,
I'll take the card, thanks :)
Until I was about 8 years old, Xmas was plentiful, exceptional, dizzy-making food, such as roast chicken, 4 vegetables, 3 desserts, etc. (With small, no cost gifts for us kids, a tree, songs, etc.) Then my parents started to earn money in proper jobs, and the beribboned packages started to pile up. And up!
40 some years later, I have returned to the same system. With one difference: I will give 10 small sums to 10 charities, because within the Swiss system, my gift makes me a ‘member’ and the association (non profit) can use me and all its other members for clout. (I am also available for advice.) Its the best compromise I could come up with for this year. As this ain’t a cooking board I won’t post the menu.
http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bonuses-on-wall-street-surge-14-pe...
Newsflash: Santa has dementia. Naughty and nice lists mixed up.
And yet, it is absolutely unthinkable that we should raise income taxes even a little bit on these parasites.
Maybe he has a really big car, or drives long distances. Let's not be so judgmental.
"Maybe he has a really big car, or drives long distances. Let's not be so judgmental."
I can't really tell if that was a joke or not (I suspect it is), but there's obviously something more wrong if the guy can't pony-up $6 or so a week for more milk.
From an NPR story this morning:
That dude needs to get a better research group. We noticed.
Damn straight I noticed. The same Family Size box of cereal I buy shrunk 5 oz. in one week, but remained the same price. THAT is a type of inflation that is ignored in the gov stats.
From the CPI FAQ:
"If the selected item is no longer available, or if there have been changes in the quality or quantity (for example, eggs sold in packages of 8 when they previously had been sold by the dozen) of the good or service since the last time prices had been collected, the economic assistant selects a new item or records the quality change in the current item."
So shrinking packages are noticed by government statistics just as they're noticed by customers.
I, for one, get irritated at a company when they shrink packages instead of increasing prices. I'd rather pay 10/9x than get 9/10x; saves on trips and packaging, if nothing else.
On the other hand, you can no longer buy the old 25 cent mini potato chip packages. You have to get the 3 ounce plus packages for $1.29.
Dragonfly, it's ignored in the CPI because of the hedonic adjustment -- it's a better quality cereal.
"..did not notice.."
This of course being the euphemism for
'We got away with it. They're still buying our cardboard boxes full of pre-sweetened cardboard'
The sad part being that 'There's no food in your food!' as Joan Cusack said in 'Say Anything' (right?)
Go back to oatmeal, brothers and sisters. Stop buying air.
Bob
They mention stuff like Froot Loops because they are an American staple. You can throw some sugary stuff in a box at your kids in the morning and give 'em their sugar high in place of love.
This is why Snackables/Lunchables are also so popular - lots of hidden sugar, get a good high off 'em after starving all day with nothing for breakfast but Froot Loops and they're in a package all ready to go that a 3-year old can figure out, just toss 'em that in place of love.
Love as in giving a damn and cooking proper food.
And this is why a banker values his gas-guzzler more than MILK for his kids whom he probably hardly knows.
Yeah, I grew up with the same addictions, but my Mom was working us away from it, even early on. I was anemic until Mom read in some hippy-dippy mag that I 'Should' be snacking anytime I was hungry, and it should ONLY be from a fruit bowl.
Next doc's visit, I was completely 'Normal'.. it's a miracle!
But I still have cravings for Poptarts, and would love to snag a box of Apple-Jacks sometime, if they still exist.. Food issues go deep.
Actually I'm old enough, mid-40s, to have grown up with the old way of doing things, Mom actually made us eggs and toast, oatmeal, etc. Dad would fry bacon, we ate breakfast together, it was great. Dinner was baked chicken, cassaroles, it just friggin' ruled.
Then as our family disintegrated and we became poorer and poorer we went to all packaged foods wherever possible, anything you could throw at the kids without giving a shit about them. We lived on stuff like Kraft mac and cheese, made with no milk and if we were very lucky, a can of tuna mixed in.
This was by far not the cheapest food, but it was by far the one way to keep the kids from starving with the smallest possible amount of love or care.
And this is how Americans live now. Kids all around us were growing up the same way (except for the weird uber-religious ones who weren't allowed to play with us) and basically I saw a whole society decay all around me.
So when I say Americans are going to pitch a major freak when Froot Loops double in price, it's because they really will. It will take a HUGE rebuilding of society before moms will make their kids eggs and toast in the morning and the family will eat breakfast together.
I'm not that keen on breakfast cereal or Pop-Tarts. But I love Kraft macaroni and cheese. My mom actually didn't serve it very often. It was a very occasional treat.
Nowadays, macaroni and cheese is really big. They sell it at fast food places (fried into little cakes, so you can eat it on the go). There are restaurants that only serve mac and cheese. There are recipes for making it from scratch everywhere. It's on the menu in tony gourmet restaurants, made with five different kinds of biodynamically produced cheese, and topped with crabmeat or caviar.
But I like plain ol' Kraft. Everything else tastes bland in comparison.
I even donated several six-packs to the local food drive. It's what I would want if someone was giving me food. (At least when I was a kid - I try to eat healthier now.) The only kid I knew who didn't like Kraft mac and cheese was the one whose mom used to mix wheat germ and shredded veggies into it to make it healthier. Once she had it made the normal way, she loved it.
Hi Leanan,
Yes, it's one of those truisms that kids like plain food, esp. mac and cheese (or pizza).
Since we're talking brand names here, have you tried "Annie's"? Better than Kraft, believe it or not. Comes in both organic and non-organic versions. Annie's is about as healthy as it gets. I think the price is comparable - it's frequently on sale.
Good mac and cheese is GOOD.
This was (a) not enough (b) not made with milk. OR butter. Or any extras just the nuclear-orange cheese powder and water and (c) just not all that satisfying after not eating all day. Yes we wolfed it down. Sure. But it's one of those "poverty foods" I've had trouble reconciling with.
I'm sorry but it was many years before I was able to eat mac and cheese again.
But it is good, done right, you can make it from scratch, it's not hard to do at all.
I don't know if I've seen Annie's in the stores here. Kraft also makes an organic version, though.
I actually don't eat macaroni and cheese very often these days. It's too much work and takes too long. :)
But I am storing more food these days than I used to. (Hey, the government recommended it, even though they're worried about bird flu, not peak oil.) Boxed mac and cheese is not ideal, since it has to be cooked, but it will last indefinitely.
Ha ha ha ha! You must either eat out, eat out of a can, or eat frozen stuff a lot! Since I've moved to my farmette last year 95% of my meals are homemade from scratch. I'm preparing some homemade biscuits and gravy as I type. I must confess, however, I am a sucker for Kraft four cheese mac n' cheese.
I do eat a lot of frozen stuff. Fresh food goes bad too quickly, so even when I buy fresh, I end up freezing it, because I can't eat it all.
I am trying to cook more. I just find the whole process very tedious. Especially when it comes to things like waiting for water to boil. I tend to wander off, forget about the stove, and come back when the water's almost boiled dry. I prefer cooking methods that you can forget about for awhile. The microwave and the toaster oven will shut off automatically. The crock pot is very forgiving. The stove and the oven are a pain.
One could probably "Kraft" a pretty funny story about archaeologists from the 45th century coming across a box of mac & cheese during a dig, and fixing themselves a meal.
If they were real unlucky they would find a can of spam next to it.
Hi Bob,
re: "oatmeal".
For the benefit of the listening audience (esp. those in DC) - did you know (I'm sure you do, Bob) - it's really easy to make your own snacking-type cereal and/or muesli? that doesn't need to be cooked, even. (Just add - whatever liquid.)
Use "fine cut" raw organic oats. Available at your local food co-op. Add whatever dried fruit (cut up, if necessary), nuts (cut up if necessary) and...a few rice crispies :)? Fine cut oats can be eaten raw. (Or, you could always heat it up, if you like.)
It is a joke. But, it really isn't a joke that between driving and parking on one hand and people's children on the other - it's often hard to tell where people's priorities are.
The green PC response might be that the guy should get his kids off of cow's milk anyway and go to Soy milk. Of course it is probably more expensive..... can't win.
Soy milk better than cows milk? Not necessarily, even if the soy milk is organic. Locally produced organic milk may be better than industrial-organic soymilk that consumes far more energy for production and transport. But on the other hand, there IS all that bovine flatulence. Quelle dilemma!
Soy milk, if buying the Walmart brand, is $2.44 for 1/2 gal in Arkansas. If you buy a 2-pack at Sams you can normally get 1 gal for $5.20 or so. More expensive than standard milk, but it's on par or sometimes cheaper than organic cow milk.
Hi Durandal,
Is this Walmart brand organic?
How much does it cost to make soy milk yourself?
A lot of different greens out there though, ET.
We're using Raw Milk and unpasturized/unhomogenized Dairy products, Cheese, Yoghurt, etc..
Rice milk might be OK.. but as said yesterday, I'm not buying processed Soy foods these days. (Except Fermented, as with Tempeh and Shoyu sauce.)
" Soybeans come to us from the Orient. During the Chou Dynasty (1134 - 246 BC) the soybean was designated one of the five sacred grains, along with barley, wheat, millet and rice. However, the pictograph for the soybean, which dates from earlier times, indicates that it was not first used as a food; for whereas the pictographs for the other four grains show the seed and stem structure of the plant, the pictograph for the soybean emphasizes the root structure. Agricultural literature of the period speaks frequently of the soybean and its use in crop rotation. Apparently the soy plant was initially used as a method of fixing nitrogen.3 "
http://www.westonaprice.org/soy/ploy.html
From the fringy edges of the Outer Rim..
Bob the Hutt
ps.. Our Daughter, at 4.5 has never had an ear infection. Ever.
EDIT- adding one more para from lower in the linked doc.
" Soybeans are also high in phytic acid or phytates. This is an organic acid, present in the bran or hulls of all seeds, which blocks the uptake of essential minerals-calcium, magnesium, iron and especially zinc-in the intestinal tract. Although not a household word, phytates have been extensively studied. Scientists are in general agreement that grain and legume based diets high in phytates contribute to widespread mineral deficiencies in third world countries.5 Analysis shows that calcium, magnesium, iron and zinc are present in the plant foods eaten in these areas, but the high phytate content of soy and rice based diets prevents their absorption. The soybean has a higher phytate content than any other grain or legume that has been studied.6 Furthermore, it seems to be highly resistant to many phytate reducing techniques such as long, slow cooking.7 "
(Phytic Acid.. Which is why you also want to soak your oats overnight, preferably with whey or yohurt before cooking and eating it..) bob
Of course, there is always the other side in a foodfight:
http://www.vegetarianbaby.com/articles/wheaties.shtml
From charts contained on pages 30-34 of Food Phytates (edited by Rukma Reddy and Shridhar Sathe, CRC Press, ISBN # 1-56676- 867-5):
and then also:
Just eat a variety of foods.
Thanks for the counterpoint.
I'm not sure why the second quote describes Chelation of Minerals as a benefit, unless it's also drawing out unwanted minerals.
As far as Cholesterol is concerned, this is one of the main sticking points that the Weston Price crowd has with a lot of contemporary nutritional theory. To whit;
http://www.westonaprice.org/moderndiseases/benefits_cholest.html
"The Benefits of High Cholesterol
By Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD
People with high cholesterol live the longest. This statement seems so incredible that it takes a long time to clear one´s brainwashed mind to fully understand its importance. Yet the fact that people with high cholesterol live the longest emerges clearly from many scientific papers. Consider the finding of Dr. Harlan Krumholz of the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at Yale University, who reported in 1994 that old people with low cholesterol died twice as often from a heart attack as did old people with a high cholesterol.1 Supporters of the cholesterol campaign consistently ignore his observation, or consider it as a rare exception, produced by chance among a huge number of studies finding the opposite.
But it is not an exception; there are now a large number of findings that contradict the lipid hypothesis. To be more specific, most studies of old people have shown that high cholesterol is not a risk factor for coronary heart disease. This was the result of my search in the Medline database for studies addressing that question.2 Eleven studies of old people came up with that result, and a further seven studies found that high cholesterol did not predict all-cause mortality either.
Now consider that more than 90 % of all cardiovascular disease is seen in people above age 60 also and that almost all studies have found that high cholesterol is not a risk factor for women.2 This means that high cholesterol is only a risk factor for less than 5 % of those who die from a heart attack. "
.. for what it's worth. It's an interesting article, but I haven't heard enough debate about the Weston Price theories to know how it stands up. Like anything we talk about around here.. we'll see.
Bob
Yeah, I think they're talking about unwanted minerals. Like heavy metal poisoning (lead, mercury, etc.).
Not really. One idea was that excess iron in the lower intestine, which might generate free radicals and possibly cancer, is reduced by chelation. Actually, recent research hasn't found reduction in cancer with high fiber diets, but who knows.
Yes, it's really surprising how little science there is that supports the conventional wisdom on diet and nutrition.
It's more likely that, in old people, lower cholesterol in just a symptom of an overall decline in hormone production and not a direct cause of the heart disease.
Phytates are used by seeds (grains and nuts) as a way to store large amounts of phosphorous needed for germination and early survival of the plant. 70-85% of the P in nuts is in the form of phytic acid. Iron in spinach and other veggies is partly tied up in phytates as well. We deal with this by producing an enzyme which deactivates phytates, and there is evidence to suggest that absorption of minerals through the intestine varies depending on the body's need for it.
Eating has always been a compromise. There is also the link/non-link between soy and dementia:
http://www.soymilkquick.com/dementiasoy.php
Oh bother...
Yes. It's difficult, and every report seems to contradict the one from 5yrs ago.. I'm a big newbie on the Nutrition front, so it helps to hear a lot of sides and 'yeah, buts'..
Thanks for playing..
What was that scene from that Woddy Allen movie? The one where the guys in lab coats are eating a hot fudge sundae, and one of them says: "People used to think these were bad for you. Little did they know then what we know now!"
Beware of the Weston Price people. I can't vouch for or against them. I have Sally Fallon's book. But I'm beginning to hear some disturbing things about them and their methods.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxb7XPm_SxU
I personally like butter, lard, meat (and grow and process it all myself) and I don't care for soy; but that doesn't mean I think soy is evil and cholesterol is god's gift.
http://www.aviva.ca/article.asp?articleid=14
I sometimes despair that an "egg" like me can understand anything anymore. There are so many mountains of experts out there, and they look scientific to me, that I simply can't comb through them all.
The way they (the Price people) cozy up with Rudolph Steiner makes me uncomfortable.
I'm a distinct anti-mystic.
The jury's still out on the Price Foundation, but it's not looking good from my POV.
Thanks,
I'll have a look.
Some groups promote ideas 'counter' to the general perception (PO?) and a culture develops that gets all precious, defensive and conspiratorial about their 'special wisdom' .. and while extremely annoying, it still doesn't 'necessarily' defeat their actual message.
I grew up on a Prep School campus (Gould in Bethel ME), and I am fascinated by 'Internal and Persistent Cultures' and some of the Siege mentalities that can develop in various institutions.. owing as much to the 'charismatic' founders as to the premise that the group is based upon. (EDIT) AND, I should add, that these cultural features can just as well be beneficial as they can be detriments.
I'm also a Unitarian, and we still get called a cult. Who knows, maybe they're right?
Bob
Just anecdotal but I bought Nourishing Traditions a couple of years ago. I don't do everything they suggest (just not up for raw meat!). But I did switch to whole milk yogurt and am making an effort to increase the amount of homemade broth I use. Previously I needed a new crown or a cavity filled every six months and I had a number of teeth with gum recession at a "3" or a "4" (bad). Since switching my diet around, no gum recession, no cavities whatsover. What I am saving on dental bills more than pays for the fresh milk I use for the yogurt and the time it takes to make broth.
There is also the oxalic acid in many greens that bind up the calcium in the greens and render it less available. Like you say, eat a variety of foods.
RE cholesterol: I believe many have developed the opinion that the HDL/LDL ratio is more important than the absolute level of cholesterol.
I thought if you lived in the U.S. the soy comes to you from the gene labs at Monsanto.
Shhhhhhh! I think it's illegal to talk about that in the Empire.
Don't talk about Whole Foods and their Republican/Bush Family links either.....
You can't fool me. It's soy juice. There's no such thing as soy milk, because there's no such thing as a soy tit. -- Lewis Black ...
Because Nudity Sells, one more note on Oats.
Naked Oats -
http://www.westonaprice.org/farming/naked-oats.html
"Generally considered to have originated in Eurasia, the oat species, Avena sativa, was domesticated relatively late in human history, some 2,100 years ago. Now grown throughout the temperate zone, oats are characterized by a short growing period and wide adaptation to different types of soil, climates and ecological conditions. In China today oats are most often grown in the northern regions and throughout Inner Mongolia, where numerous species and subspecies of wild oats are also found. Though the climate is harsh in the high altitude of Tibet, oats grow in all parts of this mountainous country as well, and wild types of oats are also commonly seen. In contrast to other oat-producing countries, however, the predominant form of oats grown in China has been the hulless variety, Avena nuda, or naked oats."
biofuels would not be driving up the cost of milk and other cow related projects if they just let cow's be cows and not house them in gigantic warehouses in cages barely big enough for them to stand in and force feed them in conveyer belts corn, somthing they did not evolve to eat.. this would also greatly reduce the greenhouse emissions too. not only that but the cows would be healthier and the products we make from them would be too. the only catch is you can't feed as many people that way.
i see what you mean. meat and dairy products are really a concentrated form of fossil fuel inputs.
I'm going to start experimenting with making my own yogurt and cheese; I've already got the yogurt maker on order. It doesn't look all that hard to do.
Not having a cow or goat, the milk will be expensive, but the value added will be my own and not something on top that I need to pay for. I'll be able to buy economically in gallons instead of quarts without worrying about the milk going bad (we don't habitually drink milk, so just need a little for recipies.) Plus, that's just one more re-localizing of a formerly distant source of supply.
If milk goes high enough, maybe I'll need to think about getting a dairy goat sooner rather than later.
Both are easy to make. Lots of guidance on the web. Never needed a yogurt maker. We've used powdered milk for yogurt most of the time. At least at current prices in Kansas City our cheeses cost less than the stuff in the grocery store and tastes better. We've been using the grocery's whole milk and locally produced goats' milk. Grocery for quick cheeses and goat for more complicated recipes that require aging.
I use an igloo cooler for my yogurt. All you really need.
A thermometer is nice, but you can judge the temperature of the milk with your wrist.
I make my own yogurt cheese and cottage cheese with recipes I found on the web. Haven't tried the aged cheeses yet as we can get locally produced cheese here in the Kansas City area.
Both are easy to make.
I've been doing this for awhile. Someone who posts here even buys my yogurt! ;]
It comes right out of the cow's teat, then I skim it and scald (pasteurize) it. I add culture and incubate. The problem here is temp. control. The culture basically heats in the warming oven of our kitchen range. The results vary.
We're finding that reused cultures will tend to deteriorate over time, probably from contamination from the air. The yogurts get more and more sour (though they're still edible).
We're going to try ordering a culture from New England Cheesemaking.
We made yogurt in the oven.
Leave the oven off, but change the wattage of the light bulb in there until you get the desired temperature. (No CFL's)
We bought one small cup of plain Dannon (with active cultures), and put one small scoop of that into cups with whole milk.
Since this was 30 years ago, I forget how long it took to turn into yogurt.
Topped with Smuckers jam.
There are lots of recipes out there for making yoghurt from dry milk which can be purchased more cheaply than liguid milk. I know Costco has 8# containers that make 10 gallons of "milk.". I don't know about places like Sam's Club.
Todd
Already have a yoghourt maker - a saucepan (with a little help from the wife) After introducing the culture to the warm milk keep the saucepan in a warm place for 24 hours.
No capital outlay on new equipment.
Mind you like to hear how the cheese goes.
We stick ours in the food dryer.
Blessed are the cheese makers
He shoulda said blessed are the bignoses!
If you can find raw milk, use it. I found years ago that store bought milk had a greater tendency to yield a 'dead' batch of yogurt, presumably because of residual antibiotics that inhibited or killed the yogurt culture. Otherwise, yogurt is very forgiving in the creation process. We used to wrap several half-gallon jars in the warming oven above our wood stove and even through cold nights after the fire had been out, the cultures would 'yoge' just fine.
Our local store now carries local organic milk at a somewhat reasonable price. The label says "no antibiotics", so hopefully that will work.
Hi WNC,
re: "I've already got the yogurt maker on order."
Can you return it?
It uses electricity, right?
The warming part of making yogurt can be done in an gas oven w. the pilot on, or maybe if no pilot, then...(don't know.) or maybe even a solar oven (haven't tried this, but assume so)
The only point of the "maker" is that it keeps the yogurt warm while in process. (AFAIK).
Yes. It's also convenient, since it comes with little jars that you cap and put in the fridge as single-servings. (At least the ones I've seen.)
But you can make yogurt in a big bowl with a towel on top, and many people still do it that way in Europe.
That's the thing, it needs to be quick, simple and easy. I can make homemade bread from scratch the old-fashioned way, but the way that breadmaking actually gets DONE in my house is with a breadmaker, because it is quick, simple and easy. If I had to do it all the old way, it probably wouldn't get done at all very often, and I'd be back to store-bought bread.
Maybe someday, when neither I nor my wife are any longer working in 8-5 jobs and have all day to work at home and in the garden on feeding ourselves, I'll dispense with all the electric gadgets and go back to the the old ways of doing everything. There's something to be said for getting a head start on as many things as possible, though, even if it is only halfway.
Here's a recipe from Mireille Guiliano. She says she got it in Greece.
Ingredients:
1 quart whole or 2% milk
1-2 tablespoons plain yogurt as a start or 1-2 tablespoons of a commercial starter (available at natural food stores)
Directions:
1. Warm up the milk in a saucepan over medium-low heat until bubbles appear around the edge and steam rises from the milk.
2. Pour the warm milk into a large bowl to cool until temperature reaches 110 F on a cooking thermometer. If you don't have a thermometer, do what the locals do: the temperature is correct when you can keep your index finger in the warm milk for 20 seconds.
3. Put the starter in a small bowl, add some of the heated milk, and stir until well-blended. Return the mixture to the large bowl, a third at a time, making sure to stir and blend well after each addition. End with a final stir, making sure all is well blended. Cover with a heavy towel and keep in a warm place 6 to 8 hours or overnight (a gas oven with a pilot light is fine, or placing a saucepan of hot water in the over to raise the temperature will help if your home is not warm enough).
4. When set, cover the bowl with plastic wrap and refrigerate for 8 hours before serving. If thicker yogurt is desired, empty chilled yogurt in a muslin bag or cheesecloth, suspend over a bowl, and drain.
To this thread --
Food miles do eat up energy. Some transfers are obviously lunatic, make no sense in any circumstance, except for the profiteers, who are on the whole only acting in a rational ‘profit’ type scheme, from their position.
I remember about 3 years ago I worked out one example - yoghurt from the UK to the ‘continent’ and vv. and found that the UK exported as much as it imported, all of course in refrigerated trucks, only the brands, flavors, packaging, varied.
Danone France exported myrtille (blueberry) yog. to England, and the Brits exported apple yog. to France! Take it just as a prototypical example, emblematic, even if I can’t work it out again (these things change rapidly..)
However specialization and exchange can’t just be dismissed out of hand - how should trade be regulated or curtailed? Local consumption is good - but how local is local? A beet farmer should survive on beets? And who decides? Who controls?
In the past, before the oil age, limits to transport curtailed world wide exchanges.
Re the food issue, I think a post I just did at an economics blog might fit here.
For context, to this paragraph of mine in a previous post:
"Turning soybean (or sunflower, or rapeseed) oil into biodiesel is a proven, cheap, scalable technology with EROEI > 1. When high enough oil prices make it viable, a huge share of today's agricultural production from Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, etc. will be diverted into biodiesel production. Land arbitraging based on profits per acre will then divert land from wheat and corn into soybeans. Food exports will drop, and poor people will be priced out of food."
one of the few Hubbert's Peak-aware, echologically-minded posters there replied:
"the above paragraph presents a problem. The reason why things appear to be "cheap" is because the environmental factors have, to this point, been largely discounted. ... add farming and land-clearing together and you'll find that we're increasing CO2 emissions through our attempts to decrease it! ... Soil degradation is something that people completely overlook. All of this agrifuel production is having a major impact on depleting our soils. This is further exasperated by declining natural gas supplies (increasing costs here); NG is the feedstock for producing our synthesized fertilizers."
to which I replied:
My paragraph above does present a problem even without considering CO2 emissions and soil degradation. I'm saying there will be less food and massive starvation in the next decades, that in effect the world is at peak food now, that 9+ billion demographic scenarios don't stand a chance, that the third horseman is coming driving a biodiesel-powered SUV.
All this doesn't sound good, but I suggest the following mental exercise. Assume you are in England in 1938 and have the opportunity to broadcast a radio message to all Jews in Germany. What will you tell them?
a. "The German government must respect your human, civil and political rights."
or
b. "In a very short time, the German government will start enslaving and killing you."?
And in contrast to the Holocaust, the coming starvation will not come out of the evil madness of a few. It will be the result of the foreseeable consensus of whole societies. Will you say to Argentines "Don't produce biodiesel, learn to live without fuels, go back to horses and oxen, and keep exporting wheat to the hungry of the world"? Won't they reply "Since when do we have the duty of feeding the world?"
Re CO2 emissions and soil degradation, have in mind that, in contrast with Indonesia and Malaysia, for South America we are talking about agricultural production that is being done now. I'm saying that the oil from the soybean they are currently planting will be turned into biodiesel, and that some of the land they are currently planting with wheat and corn will be turned to soybean. Actually, Amazon deforestation to plant soybean will proceed, but how can you stop it? Again, will you say to Brazilians "Stop clearing land, learn to live without fuels, go back to horses and oxen, because the sea level may rise in 100 years?" Won't they tell you to go straight to the Amazon and enjoy the friendly biodiversity while you can? (i.e. get eaten by a jaguar)
Furthermore, even when biofuels includes corn ethanol and soybean biodiesel, these two are completely different animals. You might be interested in the National Academy of Sciences recent report titled "Water Implications of Biofuel Production in the United States" at
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12039
which is commented by Nate Hagens in http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3285
(BTW, Nate is doing a PhD in ecological economics mentored by Robert Constanza.)
I will quote a key point from the NAS report:
So, while it's clear that the US' corn ethanol way is pure idiocy, the same cannot be said for soybean biodiesel (and even less for sugarcane ethanol, which is not an issue because sugarcane does not compete for land with grain crops.)
Therefore, while NG is definitely an issue, it will actually PUSH the process, because:
a. soybean has less fertilizer requirements, and
b. many of the electric power plants in South America are NG-fired but can also burn diesel oil. Therefore biodiesel will in effect free NG for home, fertilizer, and other uses.
Patzek and Pimental have shown that all "bio-fuels" are net energy losers.
So, externalizing the costs in order to seem on the plus side will appeal to the elites in Brazil and Argentina and here because they can make money on this physical absurdity. It will impoverish and ultimately kill us all, but at least they will be a little, or perhaps a lot, richer for a brief time. Then they, like us, will be dying along with the dying planet.
The techno-fix is not a fix. It is a shell game. It is substituting one unsustainable tech for another. The primary underlying reason for all arguments touting the techno-fix is the need to rebrand capitalism and to make it last longer under the presumption that our system is the best system ever.
This delusion has been applied by every society that ever existed.
The only way to have a "best" society is to measure that society by how well it plays with the environment. If it does not have a closed energy loop, it is defective. If it does not create better soil than it starts with, then it is defective. If it creates poisonous byproducts that are not used in some other process to render them harmless, then that society is defective. If it outgrows the environment's ability to sustain it, it is defective. If it does not encourage biodiversity, it is defective.
All other political, economic, religious, and/or cultural considerations that do not spring from environmental sensibilities are sideshows that will undermine any attempt to rectify the situation.
Wow, that's just a plain ol' lie. Show me a report where they showed Brazil's sugar cane ethanol is a net energy loser? Even the corn ethanol (which i'm not a big fan of, but see it as a stepping stone to cellulosic ethanol) study was suspect using old data:
http://www.e85fuel.com/news/072105fyi.htm
Brazil's plantations are de facto slave ones. If they had to do things the way they are done in the USA (i.e. mechanized) then their EROEI would not be looking so good. Let's not make Brazil as some sort of model for biofuels, unless you are promoting slavery. Also, Brazil cannot support North America with ethanol since it cannot even cover its own needs completely.
And your evidence for these assertions is?
Even if it is slave labor, if the ERORI is positive, it is positive. Now you can say, "In an enlightened society we don't want to base our life on slavery".... sadly I don't really think we live in a very enlightened society.
Globalization == moving the slaves far away so you don't have to look at their suffering. Nothing is more disturbing than having some half starved waif tap on the glass while I enjoy my steak.
'Slave' labourers freed in Brazil
I read about an ethanol plant, owned by ADM I believe, whose trucks were powered by its own product. Anybody have more data on that?
"The Brazilian ethanol program provided nearly 700,000 jobs in 2003"
35,000 / 700,000 = 5%
If 5% of Brazil's ethanol is produced by slave or near-slave labour, that's tragic, but it's effectively irrelevant to the energy efficiency or overall sustainability of the process. It's a small enough fraction that paying those 5% a decent wage would do practically nothing to the overall economics of the industry.
and what would a decent wage "do" to the slave laborers ?
never mind that a few (make that a few tens of thousand) individuals are enslaved, the likes of you can continue to drive our damn suv's until they pry your cold dead fingers from around the steering wheel.
Provide the only significant economic impact to the Brazillian ethanol industry from having nobody working in "conditions akin to slavery" anymore.
Did you even read what I wrote before you started ranting?
My understanding is that sugarcane does compete for land with grain crops albeit indirectly by displacing crops normally grown in grasslands that can also be grown in previous rainforest land.
Hello, Beach Boy,
re: "sugarcane does not compete for land with grain crops."
AFAIK, this is not actually the case.
We've talked about this before.
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3339#comment-274623
Hi Aniya,
I read the link and the closest statement I found was:
"For example, in Guatemala, rainforest land was cleared for coffee and sugar plantations."
Now, I'm not "the" agro expert, but AFAIK rainforest land is not prime land for wheat, etc.
As a matter of fact, my statement that "sugarcane does not compete for land with grain crops" is based on some knowledge about agriculture in the Argentinian, Uruguayan, etc. plains ("pampas"). There wheat, corn, and soybeans can readily replace each other. But no farmer would even think of planting sugarcane.
I'm not so sure but what there wouldn't be some overlap when it comes to maize (corn), though. Maize can be grown in a lot of tropical and semitropical places that won't work for wheat, barley, etc.
Rice is another grain crop with potential overlap. If you can terrace and irrigate, you can grow rice just about anywhere that you can grow sugarcane. Thus, the question as to whether or not there is overlap in this case revolves around the amount of water available - cane needs a little less than rice.
Hi Beach Boy,
Thanks for taking a look at what I looked up (back then). If you have firsthand experience (in general), I like hearing about that (I think others do, as well). I'd be interested in what you've seen "up close".
From the reading I did, it's more like an indirect, and yet still quite real, effect - is the impression I got. When land people use for basic food needs becomes more valuable to say, corporations, for new crops, then those people are displaced (to where?) and the misery/migrant/refugee factor rises. People end up going into the rain forest to attempt subsistence farming.
When the authors quoted below refer to "large-scale agriculture", I was imagining this would be the form of new sugarcane production. On what land that sugarcane would be produced - I don't know.
My guess is that any new non-food use of land in a major way has both direct and indirect impacts. When such a large percentage of the populace is already dependent on subsistence farming and at the same time, do not hold title - this seems to be a recipe for further encroachment into areas previously preserved.
Here's a quote from that link:
The reason these people are referred to as 'shifted' cultivators is that most of them people have been forced off their own land. For example, in Guatemala, rainforest land was cleared for coffee and sugar plantations. The indigenous people had their land stolen by government and corporations. They became 'shifted cultivators', moving into rainforest areas of which they had no previous knowledge in order to sustain themselves and their families (Colchester & Lohmann)."
"Large-scale agriculture, logging, hydroelectric dams, mining, and industrial development are all responsible for the dispossession of poor farmers.
"One of the primary forces pushing landless migrants into the forests is the inequitable distribution of agricultural land" (WRI 1992, Colchester & Lohmann). In Brazil, approximately 42% of cultivated land is owned by a mere 1% of the population. Landless peasants make up half of Brazil's population (WRM).”
The irony is that many nutritionists feel that cow milk is not a desirable food for adults.
Many, if not most, adults cannot properly digest cow milk because of lack of lactase. I stopped drinking milk in my late teens because it began to upset my digestion, likely because my system was no longer producing the lactase.
Can someone tell me why full-fat milk in the USA tastes so bad compared to milk in Europe?
Try drinking organic milk from the Driftless
Region of Wisconsin. Where they still have
small family farms and very rich grass and
hay.
Having gotten used to the good stuff, factory
farm supermarket milk tastes like chemical
waste.
Wisconsin organic milk and cream has the
further advantage that it can be kept in the
'fridge for weeks. Something tells me that is
how it should be and the supermarket variety
begins as less than wholesome.
I can vouch for this. I'm shocked sometimes at how long raw milk keeps, as long as it's cold.
Here's another shocker: when it starts to "turn," it's still drinkable, though you have to develop a taste for it. It will tend to naturally ferment, like cider. It never develops that GROSS putrid state of decayed pasteurized milk which makes you want to puke.
Still, any milk over a week old here goes to the pigs.
One of my friends has a cat that will only consume milk if it's curdled. (They use raw milk, of course.) They put it in a dish, and the cat won't touch it until it curdles. Then he scarfs it down.
Yup.
Unfortunately, later, the hallway near the litterbox becomes a Dead Zone. ;]
I'm already wondering what my cats are going to think about my inevitable early yogurt experiment failures. . .
My milk is pasteurized and keeps at least two
weeks. Will eventually curdle but smells fair.
Heavy cream keeps a month or more. When it
curdles, still sweet and tasty.
Can't explain it, been drinking this way 8 yrs
Sweet is how it tastes. First word used by all
first-time drinkers. Organic Valley Dairy,
LaFarge, WI. Horizon good also. Wild Oats house
brand was good, Whole Foods house brand varies,
not all from WI. That's what's distributed in
Chicago.
Traveling in SW Wisconsin you can find milk
with enormous variance in flavor. And mass
market chemical junk. I remember local
farm fresh milk in Chicago but too long ago
to really say what it tasted like.
My guess is that it just depends on what you're used to. I don't care for the milk I've had overseas. To me, it tastes like grass. I can taste the chlorophyll. Ditto grass-fed beef. It has a bite that I don't care for.
I've tried buffalo, and it's much more flavorful than beef. It's like eating meat as opposed to eating something that should taste like meat but under the onions and A-1 sauce and all the other stuff needed to flavor it, doesn't taste all that much.
Me too fleam, I love buffalo.
I live on the Crow Indian reservation during summers. There's always some sort of cookout or barbecue going on, and yet it never fails to amaze me: the younger generations won't touch buffalo meat with a ten foot pole (the tribe keeps a herd up in the Bighorn Mts). Apparently buffalo steak (and hamburger) tastes "gross" and is too strong; instead most kids will only eat cow. For our elders and grandparents, this is a pretty disturbing change to have to witness.
Buffalo was the staple food of Plains tribes for a relatively long time. When you read through the historical accounts (or chat with some of the older adults on the rez), you find that at the dawn of the reservation era, Plains Indians all but refused to eat the cattle they were being offered. They didn't like the taste and they adamantly believed that it made their muscles soft. Of course, the cattle back then was a lot different than the stuff they're selling in supermarkets today.
Amazing how fast we can become conditioned to enjoy the taste of something as unnatural as modern "cow meat".
I guess that bison meat is one way of assuring that you're getting something that has been grass-fed rather than grain fed. I've tried and liked the burgers, never had any steaks or roasts.
You would get used to the flavor in no time at all if you had to, and the benefits are enormous - for instance, grass-fed beef has similar omega-3/omega-6 fat ratios as fish. The ramifications of just that are huge.
I paid $4.95 for a gallon of whole milk yesterday. Another store in the next town sells it at $5.49.
Gas today was $2.88 for regular.
Time for you to get a dairy goat or cow, airdale! You've got the land and set-up for it.