Quite understandable! :)

I think that the energy debate will soon enter a kind of "grief bargaining" phase -- our preferred responses will be to do what we have been doing: more liquid fuels and more driving; more war against those who keep "our" oil from us; more coal and an effort to revive nuclear power alongside that.

Culture change -- huge shifts in the way we live and think about our relationship to the planet as a whole -- are needed, and immediately and urgently.

Our political and economic leaders ought to be talking about this culture change daily and with great urgency -- so far they are only talking about how to try to continue business as usual.

I'll make a comment about coal: the U.S. DOE is very interested in carbon sequestration. As it was explained to me, the only way to save the coal industry is to capture the carbon and sequester it. No congressman is going to be able to vote to dump the coal industry. Therefore, carbon sequestration must occur. Sounds great, but what's the problem? Pressurizing the CO2 and pumping it into the subsurface is expensive. If I remember correctly, at current prices it would just about double the cost of the coal.