72 comments on My Top 10 Energy Stories of 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
72 comments on My Top 10 Energy Stories of 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Of all races in an advanced stage of civilization, the American is the least accessible to long views… Always and everywhere in a hurry to get rich, he does not give a thought to remote consequences; he sees only present advantages… He does not remember, he does not feel, he lives in a materialist dream.”
—Moiseide Ostrogorski (1902, 302-303)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Actually 10 years of assured reserves is a pretty typical figure, and not that bad one. IIRC lithium reserves for example are also in the 15-20 years range - does this spell an end to Li batteries and plug-in hybrids?
What non-oil peakist fail to understand is that resources with relatively small market are in their infancy of exploration and development compared to oil. Indium circa 2007 is pretty much in the phase oil was in 1907. And why not? Who needs millions of tonnes of Indium nobody will ever use? Even with these high prices, the whole Uranium market for example is paultry $1.4 bln a year. This compared to a daily value of oil of $8bln. So, why dig the whole world for small-value resources nobody has a pressing need of!?!
Further, are we saying we will run out of LCD TVs? Also read in Wikipedia that Indium is less rare than silver. Just wanted some feedback. Every time we have a breakthrough in solar, or whatever, there are always those who spoil the party by pointing to some shortage of something. Further, those, like the Google founders; are they investing tens of millions in technologies that will disappear in ten years. Seems like they or their well paid minions would have checked this problem out.
look to electronics. costs are going up yet prices are still going down. it's called economies of scale. why can't solar experience the same thing. why can't the costs go up but because we produce so much the panels cost less like plasma screens?
That is not the definition of "economies of scale"-I would have thought the term itself would have tipped you off. You remind me of the guy buying shoes for $3 and selling them for $2- his friend asks-how do you stay in business-his reply: We make it up on volume.
"Electronics" is not necessarily a good example. You can miniaturize information processing, but you can't miniaturize power production.