The Oil Independent Oakland task force is recommending that Oakland develop a Public Transit Master Plan to be added to the Land Use and Transportation Element (LUTE) of Oakland's general plan. (See the link below for our top recommendations.) The LUTE has Bike and Pedestrian Master Plans - it needs a transit master plan. Beyond that, we strongly recommended:

that Oakland work with AC Transit, public transit entrepreneurs, and the public to investigate the development of a municipal streetcar system or if sufficient interest exists, an East Bay streetcar system. AC Transit’s plans for dedicated Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) lanes could possibly be a first step towards streetcars. To the extent such a streetcar system for Oakland is electrified or could be electrified in the future with relative ease, it would make Oakland much less vulnerable to oil shortages and price shocks, and thereby more resilient. It is our understanding that AC Transit’s current plans do not include a streetcar system in Oakland. AC transit did, however, consider an Oakland-Berkeley streetcar system in the early 1990s and whatever plans and materials that were developed may prove useful to this effort. In its investigation, Oakland should also evaluate whether the alignment of the former Key Route System - that provided mass transit in Oakland, Berkeley, Emeryville, Piedmont, San Leandro, Richmond, Albany and El Cerrito from 1903 until 1958 - could guide feasible transit alignments to support the Urban Village transition.

http://aviewfromthepeak.com/2007/12/21/oil-independent-oakland-task-forc...

The most wonderful thing would be of course if AC Transit restored the most important part of the Key System network: the Transbay route. I imagine that it would be cheaper than building a new BART tunnel, and given that the current one is already at capacity, something will have to be done about it sooner or later. A streetcar system, especially with a transbay route, could be very beneficial for Oakland, especially if the city agrees to greatly increase density along the lines and reduce car-dependent uses, for example by allowing supermarkets and other stores with minimal parking. It could provide a nice relief and make Oakland the most affordable and pleasant place to live in the Bay Area.

Or, how about a bike lane across the Bay Bridge? At least in Marin I can ride to the City across the GG.

The OIO task force is enamored with BRT. I'm not sure they will have much luck carving out 4 lanes for a Bogota-style BRT system down Telegraph or any other major street in Oakland. Oakland is not going to become Oil Independent by buying more oil powered buses. Ironic.

You must be talking about a different OIO task force than the one I was on. The OIO task force is hardly enamored with BRT. One could say that it was (when it existed) enamored with the possibility of a municipal or East Bay streetcar system. The reference to BRT in the final draft suggested that BRT could be a first step towards streetcars:

A Public Transit Master Plan for Oakland should investigate and strongly consider the development of a citywide streetcar system, shuttles, and ways to make public transport in Oakland more attractive and more accessible for lower income residents.

Oakland should do a thorough investigation of options for creating a comprehensive, intermodal public transit infrastructure that provides sufficient options and access to citizens for commute, recreational, and utilitarian trips. The current BART-AC transit system, while useful, leaves significant gaps in coverage and timing. This work would begin with an evaluation of the current public transit infrastructure and identification of gaps or poorly served areas, consideration of projected demographic changes in the next several decades and the plans of regional transportation agencies as well as the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master plans (see the section on Coordination below).

We strongly recommend that Oakland work with AC Transit, public transit entrepreneurs, and the public to investigate the development of a municipal streetcar system or if sufficient interest exists, an East Bay streetcar system (AC Transit’s plans for dedicated Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) lanes could possibly be a first step to streetcars). To the extent such a system is electrified or could be electrified in the future with relative ease, it would make Oakland much less vulnerable to oil shortages and price shocks, and thereby more resilient. It is our understanding that AC Transit’s current plans do not include a streetcar system in Oakland. AC transit did, however, consider an Oakland-Berkeley streetcar system in the early 1990s and whatever plans and materials that were developed may prove useful to this effort. In its investigation, Oakland should also evaluate whether the alignment of the former Key Route System that provided mass transit in Oakland, Berkeley, Emeryville, Piedmont, San Leandro, Richmond, Albany and El Cerrito from 1903 until 1958. could guide feasible transit alignments to support the Urban Village transition.