![]() | The Tata Nano Strikes Back--Does Jevons' Paradox Apply to Productivity, Too? | The Oil Drum | The Limits To Scenario Planning | ![]() |
57 comments on Science 1101 Part 1: The Science of Oil and Peak Oil
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
57 comments on Science 1101 Part 1: The Science of Oil and Peak Oil
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.”
—Albert Einstein
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Figure 1 shows a year-2000 discovery rate of 10 billion barrels per year. If the production curve is just the discovery curve shifted 40 years forward in time, that implies 27 MB/d production in 2040.
A few years ago production was 1 MB/d; whatever it has risen to now probably isn't a significant fraction of present world production. I'll guess 2 MB/d.
Now, what does "extremely slow" mean? Does it mean the rate of change of production is very slow, 1 percent per year, maybe? That would bring it only to 2.7 MB/d by 2040, ten percent of expected world production.
What is the minimum year-2040 percentage it would have to attain to be significant?
How shall the car gain nuclear cachet?
Things aren't going all that well in the Canadian oil sands, according to an article in today's Wall Street Journal. Current production is 1.1 million barrels a day. The forecast by the CAPP for 2020 has recently been scaled back from 4.3 million barrels a day to 3.8 million barrels a day. Some of the smaller companies are leaving, because costs are too high.
If production hits 3.8 million barrels a day, it will be about 4% of our current production - not great. Current production techniques are very water and natural gas intensive.
If something like the Toe to Heel Air Injection method can be made to work, it is possible that production could be expanded. The Canadian oil sands is one place where technology could make a difference. It is possible that production could be 20% or 30% of a lower world production base in 2040, if technology works out right. I don't see it scaling up quickly, though.