Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Streets: Utilitarian Corridors or Livable Public Space
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
TOD:Europe
- Oilwatch Monthly - November 2008
- The 2008 IEA WEO - Production Decline Rates
- The EU Strategic Energy Review: maybe not so depressing after all
TOD:Canada
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
TOD:ANZ
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“A third of humanity doesn't want to ride bikes anymore; that has profound geopolitical implications.”
—Anne Korin, the co-director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security (May 1, 2005)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
Seems to me like the airline industry is in serious trouble. Emphasis added to their worries about the lead market -- uh, what about the oil market?
Green fuel, sky-blue dreams
Octane rating is really only pertinent to gasoline powered piston engines, so it has almost no effect on airlines, since they almost exclusively use jet fuel in turbine engines.
This is discussing the use of aviation gas in light aircraft. It is a tiny market compared with kerosine as used by jet aircraft. I am amazed that lead is still permitted at all - high octane lead free petrol has been available in the UK for decades. It can only be a price issue. I'm sure a light aircraft operator would accept a 25% reduction in range if the option is not flying at all.
The article states they use 1.7 million gallons per day of leaded fuel for aircraft, as opposed to 40 million gallons per day of jet fuel being used.
From my (now old) internal combustion engines course, I recall that the higher octane fuels allow higher compression ratios in an gasoline engine. It's the higher compression ratio which produces the improvement in conversion efficiency. This also applies to engines with superchargers, which are common on more expensive aircraft. The use of high octane gas used by small general aviation craft might not see much benefit from this fuel, unless it happens to be made of longer chain hydrocarbons. This might produce problems at high altitudes, where temperatures are low.
It's rather well known that cars which are designed to run on "regular" road gasoline do not experience any gain in fuel economy from higher octane grades. There may even be a drop in gas mileage, as some of the higher octane rating may be the result of ethanol added to the blend. There are some cars on the road which are designed for high octane fuel, but are "detuned" to operate on the regular grade. One way to accomplish this is thru the use of a "knock sensor", which detects pre-ignition and retards the spark timing to compensate. These cars would be able to take advantage of the higher octane by operating at optimal spark advance.
E. Swanson
It's more likely a performance issue, not price. Aircraft performance is defined within a stable range of the four opposing forces - thrust, drag, lift, and weight. Change any one of these (like lowering octane) and you reduce the size of the "stable envelope". Pilots don't like that.
Most small aircraft have 4 or 6 cylinder air cooled piston engines, the vast majority designed in the 1950's and early 1960s. It is my impression that FAA certification applies to fuel as well as the engine, and the process of accepting any change is a lengthy one. A small percentage can run on regular unleaded but most private piston aircraft require 100LL which is dyed blue. I guess it's 100 octane low lead, but how low I don't know.