131 comments on Oil Price Closes Above $100 a Barrel - New Peak Oil Press Release
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
131 comments on Oil Price Closes Above $100 a Barrel - New Peak Oil Press Release
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
- An interview with Stoneleigh - the case for deflation
- The Future of European Transport: iTREN-2030
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
—Big Oil Executive
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
NYMEX now at 100.61.
Is there a lot of speculative money pouring into the market just now ?
Bloomberg seems to have given up providing explanations.
Perhaps they are getting bored with all these new records.
NYMEX now 100.92
Am I the only person on TOD following this ?
I will leave it to someone else to post the next record.
Sorry, but I can't resist informing you all that NYMEX has now reached 101.20.
Will someone please shut me up !
The question isn't so much particular indices rising above $100 a barrel. Its more "what is the future path of prices and when will be the last point the price is below $100?"
Now personally I originally calculated the end of Feb for the rise above $100, so the previous high caught me by surprise and this price is in keeping with the maths.
However, what with the likelihood of a number of large fields coming onstream this year, together with the probability of recession, I'd have to say I'd expect a fall back to the $60-$80 region in time for the US elections. That's excepting someone doing something stupid.
However I still see no reason to believe the start of the decline won't be in the 2011-12 timeline - 3-4 years away. What are we doing to prepare and adapt? Where is the movement? We are getting inside the planning horizon of business and politicians, but still the action isn't there at a large scale level.
Next to the large scale picture, day to day movements on Nymex are unimportant.
I think it goes slowly to $110, then the economy slows down and it settles back in to the mid-70s or 80s for a while, save any other geopolitical events. But still...that's gotta be enough to make it hurt. Especially with crack spreads finally catching up and gasoline demand about to increase.
I agree I did not expect it to go this high. However my worst case scenario indicates that GOM and other high technology old producing regions should be declining fairly rapidly now. Small field infield drilling etc. If this is true then I think the price is heading for 150 or so by mid summer.
However short term I'm waiting to see when the US can no longer import all the gasoline it wants. Once gasoline and blending components for export are maxed out thats when the fun begins.
So far it seems we can always buy all the gasoline we want but I suspect that sometime this year maybe the fall this will end.
The reason I think this is important is its root cause will be simply not enough oil for refinery capacity thus building more refineries in the US and competing for crude does no good.
Before this import prices for gasoline should increase substantially and like I said it seems we can get whatever we want now. But thats the number to watch it will go down before crude imports.
However my worst case scenario indicates that GOM and other high technology old producing regions should be declining fairly rapidly now.
Memmel, Prof. G.
That would be a good subject for a write up.
GOM - 3 Years Later
With all the post Kat-Rita damage at the time, and how much was impared, it would be a great study to take a clinical look now.
How much was lost?
How much capacity was/will never be reclaimed?
Dollar amount of loss?
etc.
Just Sayin...
I found a wealth of data on the DOE website. I'd have to dig up the links but I posted them here a few times. Simmons has given several talks on the issue.
Bringing it all together is a bear since their is a treasure trove of data and a number of good summary papers exist.
Short summary is if the rest of the world that has invested in advanced extraction methods follows the decline patterns seen in the GOM we are fucked.
And sorry to use such language but...
Nup.
$180 by the end of the year, I say. Just in time to give the knockout punch to the US economy - then it drops back down a bit to $130, and all that unfulfilled demand from China, India, etc drags it back up slowly.
Sorry, but I don't see the importance in your reporting every new record. It is not as if the world is going to end with someone paying $101 for a barrel of oil. Go and do something useful.
It is basically a reason for a news-like story to tell to the press. Sometimes there are teachable moments. We are hoping this is one of them.
Gernos - at The Oil Drum we don't really give a damn about the oil price but we do care about energy shortages and the impact upon society;-)
However, by chance I just happened to click by accident on this chart busting spike over at 321.
http://www.321energy.com/index.php
I think we'll see the oil price move sharply up to $110 from here.
Closing prices today:
Tapis $101.79
Bonny $101.07
Louisiana $103.50
WTI $100.83
http://www.upstreamonline.com/market_data/?id=markets_crude
We may see Brent break through $100 tomorrow.
And by way of partial explanation of what is going on in terms of supply and demand imbalance I think this chart is part of the story:
Our outlook for Russia from the Khebab/Brown Top Five Net Exporters Paper:
Bloomberg seems to have given up providing explanations.
I noticed that as well. Wasn't too long ago you'd see a story entitled "Oil trading higher on Middle East concerns" replaced ten minutes later by another that read "Oil trading lower on latest job report", followed shortly thereafter by a third telling us "Oil little changed at market close". Personally, I never found their analysis all that helpful; then again, I never understood the inner workings of these things and I suspect I never will. I've resigned myself to the fact that my only real connection to the markets is at the pumps and that little fill slip the oil man drops through the mail slot.
Cheers,
Paul