Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Streets: Utilitarian Corridors or Livable Public Space
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
TOD:Europe
- Oilwatch Monthly - November 2008
- The 2008 IEA WEO - Production Decline Rates
- The EU Strategic Energy Review: maybe not so depressing after all
TOD:Canada
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
TOD:ANZ
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“It is only through labor and painful effort, by grim energy and resolute courage, that we move on to better things.”
—Theodore Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
This is one sided corn-bashing getting really STOOPID.
A 26 gallon tank of filled with ethanol would take 560 pounds of corn.
So replacing gasoline with say E85 in the SUV tank would take
560 pounds of corn(10 bushels of corn) PLUS 167 pounds of DDGS animal feed which is equal to 65 pounds of meat or 6 gallons of whole milk( milk is 90% water).
The average american eats 200 pounds of meat a year and 300 pounds of dairy products(mostly milk) a year.
That figures to require about 1200# of DDGS a year or 69 bushels of corn that would also produce 180 gallons of ethanol. E85 is gets 70% the mileage of straight gasoline. At 14 mpg, that will get his SUV about miserable 2520 miles.
So after 7 trips to fill his gas tank with E85 would produce enough dairy and meat to feed the average american for a whole year.
Producing corn ethanol would result in a bumper crop of food! If we could replace all 150 billion gallons of gasoline with E85 we would increase our meat and milk bounty by over 300%. But I don't want to eat three times the meat and dairy I eat now! (And it doesn't seem possible in terms of cropland acres.)
Attempts to turn this into a 'guns or butter' argument are futile. We would get a few 'guns'(energy) and a lot of 'butter'(animal products) with corn ethanol.
It's no wonder these food versus ethanol fanatics don't get it.
We don't have a FOOD crisis we have a FUEL crisis!
(But a FOOD crisis works so much better with their Malthusian doomer nighmares, does it not?)
Three errors.
Cattle, in particular, can take only a small percentage of their diet as distillers grains, Too much and they get "scours", diarrhea.
And the ethanol industry is fast approaching that limit.
One gets more meat & milk from unprocessed grains (you are taking away many of the calories when distilling).
And the BEST response to food shortages is less meat and milk and more tortillas, etc. Save some for your fellow man even if you can afford to keep your belly full (or obese).
Alan
RE: "Good Calories, Bad Calories"
It may be the case that 'we can feed more people' on veggie matter (carbohydrates) but that they would be much healthier eating a more ecologically expensive diet high in meats and fats and low in carbs. IMO Gary Taubes' hypothesis has been extremely well researched and presents us with quite a dilemma. Healthy but possibly ecologically unsustainable diet, or less healthy but ecologically sustainable diet.
Taubes, Pollan, and Weston Price would probably all agree on the health aspects, especially their distaste for the highly manufactured Western diet. I've never seen a life cycle analysis of factory farming techniques versus the old fashioned ways - for example how much does grass-fed/grass-finished beef cost relative to the feedlot grain-fed variety? If you got rid of the manufactured fertilizers, processed animal feed, antibiotics and supplements would the cost of meat increase or decrease? How about dairy? I have no clue. What if you add in the cost of fouled water supplies,
increased need for expensive health care, natural gas depletion, soil depletion, .... Oh rats, I'm getting ahead of myself...
I guess what I'm trying to say is there's a system level view of this; we can't regard it as an isolated subsystem.
Chris
Do get a copy of All Flesh is Grass and read it as it answers many of your questions.
Your numbers may be skewed by the American way of life. I suspect the average human worldwide can't afford anything near 200 pounds of meat a year. Try your calculations with 50 pounds of meat and the majority in grains and veggies. I think it will come out remarkably close to one tankful of ethanol.
On the other hand, if we outlawed high fructose corn syrup as a foodstuff and used a little less sugar, we'd have plenty of corn left for ethanol, and probably a healthier population.
It feels like we need to find a new balance point. As long as Big Ag runs things we'll have the most profitable food, not the most healthy or sustainable.
Corn is mostly animal feed. If human life is so valuable and threatened by an inadequate supply of corn, quit feeding the stuff to animals. There are 65 million hogs in the United States. Each hog consumes 15 bushels of corn to reach market weight. Kill the hogs! Save the people.
Straw man arguments that say that ethanol can not replace gasoline are silly. Of course it can't. No serious ethanol supporter would pose such and argument. We don't need to replace gasoline in the near future. We need to supplement it. Even the most rabid Peak Oiler does not say we will run out of oil.
Corn currently exported goes mostly to wealthier countries like Japan and China. They use it for animal feed just as we do. When it is sold to foreigners for animal feed or human food, a portion of the energy of corn is lost to the American economy since corn is inappropiately priced for its energy content. When I burn a bushel corn in my corn stove it is worth the equivalent of $9.00 of LP gas. When it is sold for export, it goes for about $5.00. $4.00 is lost to the American economy.
Those who are so worried about the starving should ask themselves if they are willing to have their taxes raised to pay for the corn they believe will save lives. Or do they just want farmers to sell corn for less than its energy value and make non economic decisions based on faulty analysis.
There is no need to raise taxes. The elimination of corn ethanol subsidies should suffice to kill the economic viability of the stuff.
Another important issue is the marginal net energy gain of corn ethanol. The energy balance is near break even, so the only thing this is accomplishing is the consumption of valuable arable land while we pay more for energy and food with no net energy gain. What a bargain!
What about cellulistic ethanol? This would not be so bad, as it uses a waste product, but it is not technologically ready yet. Why even bother with converting the waste to ethanol? We can convert it directly into diesel with existing technology and one BTU of diesel goes further than one BTU of ethanol, as diesel engines are much more efficient than spark ignition engines.
You have to kill the mandates too, or the cost will just come out at the pump.
Which wouldn't be a bad thing; the "Live Green Go Yellow" ad campaign would be dead within days.
Majorian it is your post that is really STOOPID! No one is talking about what the average American eats and no one is talking about wheat after it has been cycled through a cow. We are talking about the number of calories a citizen of the world normally consumes in a day and the number of calories, in wheat, it takes to fill the tank of an SUV. Here are the numbers:
Now dispute those numbers without talking about how much meat the average American consumes after it has been cycled through a cow. How many kilocalories does the average Haitian consume? How about the average Bangladeshi or Indian or Sub-Sahara African? A quarter of a ton of wheat would be 250 kilos per year or .685 kilos per day, or 1.5 pounds of wheat per day.
Does the average citizen of the third world consume, per day, the calories contained in 1.5 pounds of wheat? I don't know but that seems pretty close to me. So basically you could feed one person for one year on the amount of calories contained in one SUV tank of ethanol.
Ron Patterson
I must say Majorian
your lack of compassion is breathtaking. Whether, the notion that the impoverished can afford a diet of meat, the lack of concern about what ethanol does to the price of grains - the principal diet of the world. Or the utter disregard for those poor animals force fed grain, let alone distillers grain.
We really have no hope.