thanks for those numbers.

There's a factor you didn't include: clathrates. As the arctic heats up, the tundra is going to expirate vast amounts of methane. I am uncertain as to how much temperature rise will kick the clathrates into meltdown, but I can't imagine it is very terribly much - 5 degrees perhaps? combine that with the problem that the Arctic is heating faster than other areas, and it all points at a significant clathrate release, which would exacerbate if not dwarf the CO2 problem.

But I am not sure how much of a temp. increase it will take to unleash the clathrates, and I am uncertain as to when (if everything continues as business as usual) that temp will be reached.

best regards,

S2
TO
ON

That sort of thing, along with the carbon sink capacity of the oceans and how they interact with warming, etc - that's all very new science, and unclear.

That, combined with varying emissions scenarios (eg, 1,000Gt in 20 years then 10Gt per year for 80 years is a different scenario to 1,800Gt over 100 years) is why the IPCC quote gives those quite large ranges for so many Gt of carbon giving us so much effect.