313 comments on DrumBeat: March 12, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
313 comments on DrumBeat: March 12, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Data always beats theories. 'Look at data three times and then come to a conclusion,' versus 'coming to a conclusion and searching for
some data.' The former will win every time.”
—Matthew Simmons, ASPO-USA conference, Boston, MA, October 26, 2006
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
IMO, you are correct about the wisdom of oil producers electing to defer production (much more common onshore than offshore of course), partly because it is hard to find quality production.
Oil reserves are valued on a Net Present Value (NPV) basis. You estimate the annual production, throw in the operating costs and a price projection and then discount the stream of income to present value using some kind of discount rate (most commonly 10%, but it depends on whether you are buying or selling).
With low current interest rates and the expectation for rising oil prices, IMO it makes sense to develop a field and fast as possible and then to produce at less than the Maximum Efficient Rate. In many reservoirs, this will also result in somewhat higher recovery factors.
At Matt Simmons' predicted price of $200, in constant 2005 dollars, each incremental 10 bpd of production would generate a gross cash flow, before operating costs, to the working interest owners and royalty owners of about $15 million over a 20 year period. The big factor is operating costs.
The Lower 48 fields I'm talking about will produce several hundred thousand to several million barrels, and take years to decades to fully deplete--and meet world crude demand for a time period measured in minutes and hours.
But what about competition? Surely, there will be some between exporters.
My working guesstimate is that total world net oil exports will have dropped by at least 75% from 2005 to 2031. It's really more of a competition between importers for declining oil exports. As noted above, IMO, the bidding will get more aggressive as forced energy conservation moves up the food chain.
The important thing is to maximise profit - there will be competition, but that does not mean that they will produce more oil in the short term (or, more especially, enough oil to permit BAU economic growth) - profit means minimising cost/risk and maximising income. Profit is overridingly important to a producer, not the customer's/world's actual total needs.
The more efficiently a producer extracts oil the greater the depletion rate, the less time to make a profit - oil will be more expensive/difficult to extract in the future which is what causes global peak oil, since as prices rise (in order to make a profit) demand falls - as opposed to an individual oil well which peaks due to geological reasons.
Post peak we are in a new paradigm since, sadly, there appears to be no adequate alternative to oil for the forseeable future - on average expect constant declines in volume but constant increases in price - the lower the world total volume the higher the profit if you have an existing well. If the supernormal profits attract 'windfall' taxes there is a definite disincentive to produce.
Peak oil is bonanza time for producers but disaster time for consumers - the poorest consumers suffer the most - are people with the largest debts the richest or the poorest?
The economic theory, politics and energy sources used to run our 'exponential growth' world will have to be rethought I suspect.
xeroid said: "The important thing is to maximise profit - there will be competition, but that does not mean that they will produce more oil in the short term (or, more especially, enough oil to permit BAU economic growth) - profit means minimising cost/risk and maximising income. Profit is overridingly important to a producer, not the customer's/world's actual total needs."
This is oligopolistic behavior.
Yes -it is
It is how the world in general works, but especially the world of oil - a very large percent of exported oil comes from OPEC (a known price setting cartel) or from nationalised oil companies working to a domestic political agenda.
Most people try and get the maximum pay for the minimum amount of effort, if it costs more to go to work than you get in pay there is no profit so you don't do it - it is normal human behavior.
Shareholders of any large company pay the company directors to maximise and grow profits - things like paying interest on savings and pensions depend on this.