 | Bogota Part 2: Transmilenio Bus Rapid Transit | The Oil Drum: Local | RFK and Garbage Trucks: Two Measures of Success |  |
47 comments on David Paterson: First Openly Peak Oil Aware Governor
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
47 comments on David Paterson: First Openly Peak Oil Aware Governor
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
User login
Personnel
Classic posts
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
The Oil Drum: New York City archives
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
Glenn,
Thanks for finding this speech. Very interesting.
"Conserve today" -- that means he supports congestion pricing, right?
There's more than one way to cut down on car travel, and congestion pricing is a lousy one in my opinion.
My favorite would be to tax gasoline and diesel to the hilt. It is regressive (though not as much as a flat rate), but doesn't invade people's privacy and it's easy to administer. It also promotes smaller vehicles (whereas congestion pricing encourages larger vehicles).
How does congestion pricing invade people's privacy?
Because every proposal I've seen for it uses RFID and centralized tracking. It invades privacy in the same way as the RFID tool booth tags do (the ones called "Easy Pass").
Hi yartrebo,
I wonder how much energy use is involved in the tracking function.
I see nothing wrong with making people give up some privacy when they decide to use an oil burner to get around - especially in crowded cities. People who use public transport certainly can't expect privacy. We're on-camera most of the time. People who walk or bike around most cities are routinely recorded by security cameras.
Why should oil burners be any different?