http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/fashion/16farmer.html?ex=1363320000&en...

NYT: Young urbanites, learning that dirt can also be soil, are using their overalls as originally intended

But the growing market for organic and locally grown produce is making it possible for well-run small farms to thrive, said Ken Meter, 58, who studies the economics of food as an analyst at the Crossroads Resource Center, a nonprofit advocacy group for local food initiatives that is based in Minnesota.

“A lot of people in our 20s went to the land and wanted to farm and had a lot of enthusiasm, but not many resources,” he said. “It has only been the last five years where the payment from working your fingers to the bone and supplying urban markets with high-quality produce has been enough where you could imagine making a living.” Whether young, first-generation farmers constitute a flood or trickle is difficult to say. But many long-time observers of small farms say they have noticed an increase in recent years among college graduates who want to farm, even if they intern at established farms or rent tiny parcels.

http://graphoilogy.blogspot.com/2007/04/elp-plan-economize-localize-prod...
ELP Plan (April, 2007)

I would especially recommend that you consider buying, perhaps with a joint venture group, a small farm, either currently organic, or that can be converted to an organic farm. In the short term, if nothing else you could lease it out to an organic farmer. Longer term, you might consider building or moving a prefab, small energy efficient house to the farm. If nothing else, this plan may provide a place of work for your unemployed college graduate.

I foresee real problems ahead for people trying to make a living off their investments--especially non-food and non-energy investments. Simply put, there doesn't appear to be nearly enough exported energy available to generate the economic activity to pay off the mountain debt in the US or to generate the projected stock market earnings. And if we ultimately end up in hyperinflation, what will be value of "cash?" Perhaps the best investment that many of us could make would be to buy and then lease land out to organic farmers, and then do a sharecropping arrangement--taking a share of crops as a lease payment (which could be sold on your behalf by the Lessee).

Perhaps the best investment that many of us could make would be to buy and then lease land out to organic farmers, and then do a sharecropping arrangement--taking a share of crops as a lease payment (which could be sold on your behalf by the Lessee).

My family has made a living doing this.

And being the bank, providing credit and selling on their behalf.

Call me crazy, but it seems to me
that would make a good key post !?

Bear in mind the possibility of non-linear climate change. Learning from history, I suggest any proposed land isn't the same area where the dust bowl occured - unless you want to produce solar electricity instead of food.

Another good post would be on PASSIVE SOLAR, instead of alllllllll the posts we get here on solar/wind electric power techno-fixes and gadgets, which will all accelerate oil depletion and only give us useless electric power.

"..only give us useless electric power"

Useless HOW!?

How, Cliff? Useless because people can safely post unbacked assertions on their electric computers, again and again? You just listed COUNTLESS the ways we use electricity in your MASSBLOCK of text yesterday. You seem to mean 'Doomed'.. but it's surely not useless.

If the grid is down (as you predict), but you have some electric tools, vehicles, refrigeration, communications.. and some local generation capacity.. does it not stand to reason that you would be using those tools to get to work solving the various problems you've got before you? Beyond that, Generators, Motors and PV panels all have track records that attest to their endurance FAR beyond ICE equipment, which means the effort put into making them was not likely wasted.

Passive Solar is great, as is direct solar heating, solar refrigeration, etc, and they do get mentioned from time to time here, but I haven't seen any suggestions for ways that Passive Solar could help us directly with transportation, save that it leaves fuel that 'would' have been in a furnace possibly available for a truck.. but that is 'Negawatts'. As I said, it's great, but it doesn't actually move the truck or the bus, while this 'USELESS' electricity CAN.

I don't actually object to your business aspirations, and don't necessarily agree with those who snark at you about consulting. I think that's fine. But your comments are getting down to 'junk' status as long as you insist on casting these broadsides and not sticking around to reinforce your point. It's become entirely trollish.

Bob

Crickets.. Crickets, I get.

only give us useless electric power.

Yea. You just keep thinking that.

Meanwhile, I'll enjoy light, water pumping and communications with that 'useless' electrical power, Mkaytnksbi.

Aye. Me too. And transportation via my very cool (all-right call it geeky if you like) electric scooter.

Woah, and the price of oil is starting up again. Real shocker. On the back of a rates cut. Hmm. This fed thing is getting pretty predictable.

which will all accelerate oil depletion

how do they acclerate depletion? that's nonsense. very little oil is used in manufacturing and solar companies of all companies are the one's who have the energy. we should use the 50% of the oil we have left and use it as a multiplier like solar energy.

http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/3740#comment-317228

"So where's the funding scheme for Alt energy?"
first make the case that it is in fact a problem.

Seems like you have the alt energy 'case' all figured out.

Are you sure that very little oil is used in all steps to manufacture, sell, and maintain. Would you like to make a $1000 wager, with an independent referee as judge, that we both agree on. Seriously, are you ready??? I need some fast cash, and I don't mind taking it from arrogant types like you.

manufacturing is like 2.2% of oil use. at most we're talking maybe 15% of oil use to get it manufactured good's to people's houses. all that can cut through conservation or an economic downturn. meanwhile regular transportation uses about 40% of our oil. successful alt energy companies will have no problem manufacturing panels or wind turbines and etc.

Some use 100% renewable energy for manufacturing...

Hi john,

I agree w. the general direction of your comment. This topic would be worth looking at with detailed stats.

re: "regular transportation uses about 40% of our oil."

Regular transportation would be the way workers get to their jobs (manufacturing jobs) - and is your stat for manufacturing a global one?

Regular transportation would also include supplying and installing parts.

The larger point is that the economy depends also on people's wages, i.e., their having jobs...

There comes a tipping point when the input of renewable energy makes up for the loss in available non-renewable energy. It's not all of a sudden going to disappear. It's just going to begin to grow scarce and so people will have to turn to efficiencies and alternatives. If people need to, they'll carpool first, use public transport, or even bike. There are also some pretty useful all electric scooters available now.

WT-
I agree on your analysis.
The local farmers markets here in Marin are packed, with mainly young farmers, often well educated and making lifestyle decisions. They have become vibrant social gatherings, with music and art also, along with prepared food.
Sharing of good farmland with a arranged benefit for all is a model that will work.
I'm off to one this morning----

hightrekker,

I didn't know that you are in Marin.

We're starting the process of getting a local peak oil taskforce going, as well as some other local initiatives. Please drop me a note at aangel ( a t ) inspiringgreenleadership ( do t) com and we can have a coffee together and compare notes.

Leanan, is there a reason the "contact other users" page (via private messages) is turned off? Was spam a problem at one point here?

-André

Leanan, is there a reason the "contact other users" page (via private messages) is turned off? Was spam a problem at one point here?

I don't think that has ever worked.

There's a lot of features that we haven't enabled for one reason or another.

I encourage people to put their e-mail addresses in their profiles if they want other users to be able to contact them privately. I can't even contact anyone privately if they have not put their e-mail address in their profile.

Ok, thanks. If you are so inclined, you can turn on private messaging here:
/admin/build/contact/settings

Just click "Enable personal contact form by default." People then have individual control via their account page if they don't want a contact form available to the public.

It's a very handy feature...would you mind passing along the request to have it turned on? I don't see an email address to send this sort of request.

I have another question, but I'll send it to tech support.

Thanks,
Andre'

WT,

While I don't necessarily disagree with your suggestion of buying land, I really believe that people have to make the effort to develop a "realistic" future scenario. We all recognize the risk in this since it is difficult/impossible to "know" the future. Yet, it has to be done. To me, it is not that much more difficult than preparing a business risk management plan. This can be as simple as playing a "what if - then what" game or as complex as including error bars.

Dimitry Orlov (sp) certainly offers insights as well some other writings on the Internet as to what happened in Argentina. There are also fictional works such as Jim Rawles' excellent book Patriots: Surviving the Coming Collapse that contains really useful information unlike Kunstler's crap (mentioned up top).

In addition, it may make more sense for many people with limited funds to invest in their own survival via reducing their energy needs while producing their own food. I've suggested the 1979 book, The Integral Urban House, on several occasions.

Finally, I'd also suggest that people take a look at Jeff Vail's Rhizome series. http://www.jeffvail.com

Todd

'Perhaps the best investment that many of us could make would be to buy and then leese land out to organic farmers, and then do a sharecropping arrangement--taking a share of crops as a lease payment (which could be sold on your behalf by the lessee).'

I like the idea WT but see a problem with it. All governments will soon be strapped for revenues and an easy tax target is property. Taxes will be increased to the breaking point for many farmers and small land holders. Making mortgage payments will become problematic. The large farm operations will probably be given preferential treatment (if they still exist), as they are now, by tax collectors. Home owners and commercial renters in many parts of the country are already feeling extreme tax pressure. Of course portablity is another issue. What if GW causes current rain fall patterns to shift and the currently productive farms are short of water?

I believe that better stores of wealth are to be found in commodities. Once economies stagnate and stabilize, commodities will retain value and not be as subject to price volitility and taxation if properly shielded from tax collectors. Of course there will be no revenue stream from stored commodities except on the sale or barter of the commodities. As an option I propose one store commodities now and use them as a bridge to the future, a bridge over troubled waters, when they will be useful in the purchase of a busines as opportunities are identified. The sought after future revenue stream might very well be a farm/sharecropper arrangement but storage of commodities now will provide more options in the future. By 'commodities' I mean those that can be held and transported by the owner, and shielded from tax collectors.

Re: property taxes: Most states have enacted some form of "use value" tax policy for lowering property taxes on farmlands. Farmland in Wisconsin pays pennies on the dollar compared to non-farmland. Minor increases in the tax due to higher "use values" (driven by ag commodity prices) could relieve pressure from non-farmers to eliminate this tax benefit (plus big ag supports the benefit, so it is unlikely to go quietly). Community land trusts are another vehicle for non-profit sharecropping- see:
http://www.troygardens.net/

Wisco, I realize the current tax structure is what it is...but, the tax structure is not chiseled in stone. Even if it were set in stone there are plenty of stones left to chisel a new tax code onto.

As various governments become more desperate for tax revenue collections they will change tax codes as they feel necessary. It certainly is not beyond belief that tax code can become confiscatory... it has happened in the past and forces more efficient land use. At least, that is the spin that the confiscators put on their actions.

As various governments become more desperate for tax revenue collections they will change tax codes as they feel necessary. It certainly is not beyond belief that tax code can become confiscatory... it has happened in the past and forces more efficient land use. At least, that is the spin that the confiscators put on their actions.

Look for an increase in the number of lawsuits by homeowners against county governments suing to have taxes lowered in proportion to property values.

In fact, look for the courts to be totally clogged with lawsuits of every kind as we waltz into the scapegoat finding phase of this 'project' we call the world economy.

With a little further thought, it may come about that county governments will be so strapped that there will be no realistic way they can administer the confiscation of land for taxes, much less doing anything with said land. The county government is already, in some cases, becoming the 'repository of last resort' for mortgaged property 'gone bad' that the banks don't want or can't handle. I could easily see situations developing where people continue to live in their houses without paying taxes because a dysfunctional county can't do much about it (can't even answer the phones...).

Wisco, as an addendum to my above post regarding changing tax codes...I have a couple of rental properties on beachside. I have been put up against the wall by increasing taxes in the last few years, and once I was the beneficary of low taxes. Once I made a small profit on rentals, now I am fortunate to break even. I am at the point where rents pay for repairs, taxes and insurance...if I do any needed repairs myself. If my properties suffer storm damage, as they have in the past, I will have to pay the large insurance deductable out of pocket. I am not whinning, simply pointing out how quickly tax collections can be changed by governments and place owners at risk. Perhaps my real world experience has caused me to favor the commodities stategy?

River - About the "store of wealth" thing.

IMO there are 3 main drivers for the wealth storage fallacy , health, education, security in old age (not necessarily in that order).

Storing wealth does not insure protection on those issues.

A focus on family and community does.

The elusion of storing personal wealth particularly isolates one from both family and community. (please don't dish altruism here as it has been debunked in other posts I believe. I have personally seen wealth break up families more often than not).

IMO we need to recognize this as another one of those detrimental messages that has been circulating through society and reexamine.

Few are willing to think of it this way as it implies giving up something (not true) and as peaknikers understand all too well nobody is going to give up an ounce.

This is why I'm a souper doomer.

Souperman2...If you had a family like mine you would not depend on them for anything. To say that they are dysfunctional is a huge understatement (excluding my wife, myself and our children). Anything that I have was gained by working my way through school on the GI Bill and very hard work for many years thereafter. I traveled the world working on HS Rail systems, mostly acceptance testing, for a large rail signal company in the US. I worked is some very tough environments, lived in places where cockroaches and centipedes were the norm, and carried a hand gun to protect the crew from bandits. I am 63 now and do not plan to throw myself on the mercy of 'community' for survival in my remaining years. My life experiences include a couple of communes back in the late 60s...Fun, but not survivalists. My childhood community were hard shell protestants that were narrow minded and selfish and I have no use for such people. In fact when I graduated from HS I was outta there and into the Navy for 4 years.

I am a biker and my community is the biker community. We participate in many charitable activities, raising money for the Conklin Center For Blind Children, handicapped children, down bikers, etc. We are a close knit group and when push comes to shove we look out for each other.

Because of where I live I have prepared for hurricanes for many years and have built up a store of supplies. There is little that you could mention that I have not accumulated, including a couple of years food supply. If need be me, my wife and my community can protect what we have without being dependent on each other. Coming to the aid of a biker that needs help is done without question but long term charity is not in the mix. Everone in my community understands the rules.

I do not want or have 'luxury' in my life and believe in being as independent as possible. I was riding bikes and saving gas, and collecting gold coins, before most on this board were born. I will not hand over what I own to enter some mystical nervana...But the thought of such a move gives me a good chuckle. Perhaps if you were my age, or were beneficary of my family and life experiences, you might have a different take on things. We all arrived where we are by different paths.

Hello River,

I mostly echo your comments above regarding commodities--Recall my earlier posts on various speculative methods for hoarding I-NPK before FF-depletion and I-NPK depletion gets too severe forcing the inevitable growth O-NPK recycling, hopefully by my speculative SpiderWebRiding Networks.

Basically, Farmland without I/O-NPK is like an SUV without gasoline.

Unfortunately, we can't just pour a ten-year supply of NPK into the topsoil: the soil is chemically overwhelmed; it can even be toxic to the plants. But the I-NPK can be safely stored.

If conditions change, the fertilizer can be moved to where it can be more productively used. In the olden days, millions of tons of organic bird & bat guanos, human bones, burned-tree potash, and Atacama Desert nitrates were laboriously hand-processed, then moved globally on sailing ships. I have posted many links on this earlier. If memory serves: Britain alone was importing 300,000 tons/year of guano at their importation peak before the discovery of I-NPK [No Pananma Canal shortcut either!]. Who knows how many additional tons of human bones were imported for soil nutrient replenishment?

Recall my earlier posts on instinctive animal territoriality: very simply, a lion pride has keystone title to their land, but they welcome the migrating and edible commodities of prey species, and the ecologic benefits they bring. Farmers may be considered the same in this loose context: because of their expertise, they may desire to retain title to assert principal control and decision-making over the land, but may welcome future-oriented I-NPK storage and their defense-oriented investors as outlined by my prior postings.

If the aquifer goes kaput [think Ogalalla], or the long-distance water supply breaks down [think Colorado], or regional drought sets in [think '30s Dustbowl, maybe the current SE?]: any farmer would agree that it is pointless to waste the NPK; just let the land go fallow and use the NPK elsewhere.

IMO, the govt or future warlords/thugs; basically those with no interest in farming/gardening due to their laziness and stupid, high future discount rates: they will be seeking any available food, not the NPK because of it bulkiness, growing time-dependencies, and huge labor inputs.

Yet, the timing window for this potential grain-grab is remarkably small; most of the growing season, before the grains headout and ripen, there is nothing worthwhile to eat. The farmers and associated I-NPK investors need only to repell those detritovore invaders long enough from the biosolar habitats to prevent them from gaining access to the grain silos.

Yep, it will be bloody, but then those deprived of food will quickly dieoff. If the biosolar areas have a prepared postPeak decisive advantage by the early stockpiling of wheelbarrows and bicycles for postPeak troop and supply movements, this can serve them well: recall my earlier posting where the Chinese leveraged this 'secret weaponry' into 300 year military dominance against those that did not have these human effort leveraging tools. Makes sense to me that they killed those who might have spied upon these behind-the-frontlines supply trains.

Skilled Earthmarine snipers can control huge swaths of land from the tops of grain silos and other highpoints. I believe the current global record for a confirmed sniper kill is 1.55 miles by a Canadian in Afghanistan. Most detritovore city gang-bangers, trying to cross a field to loot a grain silo or chicken farm, won't stand a chance in hell against a platoon of dug-in defensive snipers on the high ground. 'One shot, one kill' is the most fearsome weapon ever devised for face-to-face exosomatic combat once planes, tanks, and artillery are forever silenced by FF & mineral depletion.

Ok, enough for now--I live in fear of Leanan deleting my postings for length.

Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?

High Bob, I want to thank you for putting me wise to how underpriced fertilizer was. I bought some stock in a couple of fertilizer companies and they have done well.
Recently the wife and I finished selling all stocks except the fertilizers and GE. We got out in the nick of time for we had about 18% of holdings in financials.
As you know from our previous discussions I used to shoot bench rest rifle competitions. It has been about 30 years since I did the bench rest thing but I still have a few rifles that are tack drivers. I sold my reloading equipment long ago but have lots of hand rolls left. I am not into shooting people and don't want to think about what it would be like. I suppose if my family were at risk there would be little choice but I don't see someone as a threat when they are hundreds of yards away. I don't have chickens but if I did I would probably give them a chicken or two before doing anything rash. I do have lots of canned chicken soup, chicken broth, chicken cubes, canned chicken...you name it. BTW, you are welcome to stop by for chicken any time. :)

Hi Jeffrey,

Thanks and...

1) Just a "pro-forma" counterpoint, before my questions...the President appears to have the power to actually take over just about anything, as per this article, (which I believe was originally posted here on TOD - but I can't find the link.)

http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_107907.asp

Bush Makes Power Grab - And Response
posted May 24, 2007

President Bush, without so much as issuing a press statement, on May 9 signed a directive that granted near dictatorial powers to the office of the president in the event of a national emergency declared by the president.

The "National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive," with the dual designation of NSPD-51, as a National Security Presidential Directive, and HSPD-20, as a Homeland Security Presidential Directive, establishes under the office of president a new National Continuity Coordinator.

2) I like your idea, and I posted questions a while back that maybe you didn't see (or...?)

Question #1: It must be the case there are large tracts of farm land slated for the "conversion-to-suburbia" process, where developers have already purchased and are "on hold" just "waiting for the market" - to pick up. (In fact, I happen to know of at least one parcel - I guess it would be considered small-to-medium-sized - where the developers are doing exactly this.)

It seems parts of CA (Central Valley, for eg.) and TX are potential good locations to look for land in this category.

Likewise, given the stats on small farmers selling, there must be many conventional farms for sale (though haven't researched this lately.)

So, it seems like the first major requirement is there.

My question is: Where does one find potential investors?

From among the peak-oil aware? Or...?

Would it require convincing these example developers (see above) that their plans are for naught and they'd best go in an entirely different direction? But it's one with less immediate "pay-off" - yes?

And...attempting to *convince* people about the facts and/or economic implications of peak oil...? A questionable undertaking (in my experience), which seems like a tough pre-requisite for selling investors on an idea.

It also seems to me that people with sufficient funds to invest would have already done so - and/or have the capability to simply hire someone to do their own looking around - no need for other investors, etc. (?)

2) Where and how does one go about also finding the organic farmers who are educated, willing to move, and with a track record - to do this conversion?

Or, would you try to find investors (again, from where?) and then find, perhaps, a farmer willing to do the setting up and conversion process and not permanently re-locate?

3) If not too personal a question, is this something you've actually done or know of others who have done?

yes'em mam. I is a farmer an kan work hard fo you on your dirt.

please be responding az I needs to feed ma fambly and are willing to start workin all day and nigh fo u.

please tell me.

Hi soup,

Well, I thought of that, too. But thought I'd stick to WT/Jeffrey's idea and ask for perhaps more explanation. "Sharecropping" doesn't sound really appealing, does it?

(i.e., no need to get all sarcanol on me. Really. I got it before. Honest.)

"Sharecropping" doesn't sound really appealing, does it?

The better 'economic deal' is buying food items in bulk, then processing them yourself VS the effort that goes into making ones own food.