345 comments on DrumBeat: March 25, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
345 comments on DrumBeat: March 25, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race.”
—H. G. Wells, 1904
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Simmons mentions in this that oil from tar sands is bad quality - to book reserves, such as its oil sands project in Alberta, but doing so amounts to an exercise in “turning gold into lead” because of the vast energy and potable water resources needed there to produce low-quality oil.
Is there a posting somewhere that explains the details? What is oil made from tar sand chemically, why is the quality bad?
The bitumen is heavy oil with a low API. Extraction required strip mining similar to the way coal was mined. The sands were crushed and the heavy oil was separated from the ore using a flotation system. The heavy oil was then either upgraded to synthetic crude by cracking and the addition of hydrogen or mixed with diluents and shipped to a refinery area capable of processing the heavy oil mixture. Deeper tar sands were developed by the drilling of parallel horizontal wells in a process called SAGD (steam assisted gravity drainage). The steam was piped down the upper well and eventually melted the tar. The heavy oil sank to the lower well bore and was pumped out of the lower horizontal well to the surface. There is a third process called THAI (toe to heel air injection) that ignited the oil below surface using high air pressure to produce spontaneous combustion. The fire then melted bitumen and the bitumen was collected along with formation water and combustion produced steam condensate water at the other end of the well system. This process was supposed to upgrade the oil to a lighter variety as shown in lab tests. Early field test results indicated they did not upgrade nearly as much as was hoped. There were some remaining problems with sand and well control that have not been fully described. The process is yet in the R&D - pilot test phase.
I am not a chemist, but understand the bitumen is in the form of longer heavier polymers. These longer hydrocarbon chains were manipulated with expensive processes in order to render salable crude.
What is bad quality today might be of precious quality in the future.
Have you ever heard of the Pitch Drop Experiment? That's what comes out of tar sands. Perhaps you can see from the picture why its so difficult to turn into fuels like gasoline.
The term "gold into lead" might, at least partially, refer to the fact that this stuff can be used to make plastics and some other useful materials that are of enourmous value to modern society (especially modern medicine). Putting so much effort into turning it into fuel really is rather silly.
rainsong is right to say that the viscosity of bitumen has to do with the length of the polymer molecule in it. For polymers, the longer the molecules, the harder they are to pull apart from eachother.
That's a good point, but it actually refers to the use of high quality resources - clean water and natural gas - to turn tar into fuel.
Cheers