![]() | Rachel Nolan - Peak Oil Speech in Qld Parliament | The Oil Drum | Cogeneration At Home: Ceramic Fuel Cells And Bloom Energy | ![]() |
133 comments on Obama's New "Big Oil" Ad: Does He Have It Right or Wrong?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
133 comments on Obama's New "Big Oil" Ad: Does He Have It Right or Wrong?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Home Buyers Demand Short Commutes, Efficient Homes (with Backyards, Parking, lots of Square Feet)
- Streets: Utilitarian Corridors or Livable Public Space
- Summer Streets a Success!
TOD:Europe
- IEA WEO 2008 - NGLs to the Rescue?
- IEA WEO 2008 - Fossil Fuel Ultimates and CO2 Emissions Scenarios
- The IEA WEO 2008: Will coal usage be phased out?
TOD:Canada
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
TOD:ANZ
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“I'd put my money on solar energy… I hope we don't have to wait til oil and coal run out before we tackle that.”
—Thomas Edison, in conversation with Henry Ford and Harvey Firestone, March 1931
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
I don't believe that he is making any conspiracy theories here. He just has 30 seconds to get his message out. And his message is very different from McSame as Bush: alternative energy, a resistance to rolling over for hte energy companies, and a clean look at what has to happen next. Obama's people ARE aware of the issues with oil supply going forward.
On the Exxon profits dig: that is clearly shorthand for the redistribution of wealth that is occurring, from the middle class to IOCs and the NOCs. And that level of profit is is hard to defend, unless one admits that Exxon is now a tontine that refines and distributes oil as well. It is a factually true statement, and quantifiable in a way that Saudi Aramco's profits are not.
Expect an Obama presidency to take any increase in fossil fuel taxes and use those directly to reduce fossil fuel consumption going forward, sort of the same way that we now use gasoline taxes to encourage further gasoline consumption. Obama will have a better way of delivering the message that Americans need to hear, and to make them understand why what needs to happen needs to happen. As we saw in speech about race, he has a willingness to talk to Americans as if they are adults, and they are responding to that.
You'll have to back that up. His rhetoric is just that, rhetoric. How do I know? Look at his plan. 150,000,000,000 for research.
Bollocks. On the number and the plan. Show me 500,000,000,000 on implementing things we can do right now, today and another 250,000,000,000 for R&D.
Show me actions, not talk.
Cheers
The money is for research and implementation both. Might be a worth while read to look at his Energy plan in more detail:
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/pdf/EnergyFactSheet.pdf
I'm a little leery of the biofuel section myself, but the rest of the plan seems reasonable.
http://www.bravenewleaf.com