213 comments on DrumBeat: April 5, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
213 comments on DrumBeat: April 5, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.”
—Gandhi
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
House Republican Whip Blunt says U.S. Dependence on OPEC Jumps Seven Points in a Year thanks to the majority’s misguided energy strategy.
That is actually an increase of 6.7 percent of our total petroleum imports that came from OPEC. The actual
barrels imported from OPEC increased slightly more. I ran the numbers and found that imports from OPEC countries increased 8.46 percent from 2006 to 2007. Imports were 2,013,603,000 barrels in 2006 and 2,183,964,000 barrels in 2007.
However I fail to see where Representative Blunt can blame this on the Democrats misguided energy strategy. I wonder what would have happened if the Republicans were in the majority? And after all, the Republicans did have the Presidency. I think it really shows a person’s ignorance when they blame the opposite party for the terrible energy mess this nation is in. The whole world is in the same mess, is the opposite party responsible for that also?
The blame, methinks, lies elsewhere.
Ron Patterson
The blame game will still be getting played a time long after people are queing for bread, rice and flour. Unfortunately as the mess unravels much of it will still not be connected (in the minds of the sheeple) to peak oil / peaking resources. Instead it will all just have been the failure of some party, some group, some government.
Marco.
We would be a couple of weeks into the construction of the Tysons Corner-Dulles extension of DC Metro (thereby stimulating the economy) and saving 20,000 to 25,000 b/day of oil when completed & built out if it were not for the last minute, unexpected kill by the Bush Administration.
Alan
It is painful to think how much public transport could be added to the system if not for the war in Iraq. $600,000,000,000 - thats $1500/good bicycle and all gear required for every man woman and child in the US. God only knows how many kms of trams/busses that would have bought.
true, and add to that,that all the Iraqi oil would still reach the world market one or the other way. Status Q as for oil supply in other words, but subtract all US-military-oil used and add that to the civil market ...
Man, how bad has not that war been and still is ... in regards to all possible parameters.
BTW where is the world police (US/UN) on Zimbabwe? Mugabe is 1000-times worse than Saddam in my eyes!
....ahh stupid me, no oil !
I don't know the situation in Zimbabwe and I don't defend Mugabe. But there is no world police, only the UN and the US, and the UN follows the baton of the US, even though sometimes reluctantly. That Mugabe has gotten the media attention he's gotten means there is something in Zimbabwe the US or the western powers want -- otherwise you wouldn't be hearing about him, anymore than, say, you do about the Saudi rulers or any number of others. You can be sure the US rulers don't give a damn about the killing, whatever its scale, in Darfur -- they care about the Chinese eating "their" lunch. That's the only reason for the media blitz. Same thing too with Tibet and China. I'm sure the Tibetans are getting shat upon by the Chinese gov't. But I'm also sure that the scale of what's happening doesn't remotely compare to what the US is doing to Iraq (and Afghanistan). All this stuff is no doubt real to one extent or another, but the way media attention is portioned out is very much managed and selective, and serves ends that are far from humanitarian. Give me control of the spotlight and ...
Dave, I find your post cynical and silly, without any reason or logic, only accusatory. The media reports on Mugabe because he is news. The "rulers" of the US as you call them, do not rule the media. And the media in the US print or broadcast whatever they damn well please. Neither Bush nor Congress tell them what to print about Zimbabwe, Darfur or Tibet.
And when you say the "US" does not give a damn about the killing in Darfur, just who are you talking about? It is the Chinese who are ignoring the massive genocide in Darfur, not the US or UN. It is the Chinese who do not have a free press and are able to buy oil from the purveyors of genocide without a uttering a word of objection. And not a word of it is reported in the Chinese press.
I am just as pissed off about what is happening in Iraq as anyone, (but not Afghanistan). I think Bush is the worst President in US history but that does not lessen the horror of what is going on in Darfur, Tibet or Zimbabwe. And the US press has every right, indeed a duty, to report on atrocities going on there.
The media has two masters, its subscribers and its advertisers. And contrary to popular belief their advertisers do not control content. Witness CNN and CNBC and virtually every other media outlet chastising WalMart, one of their largest advertisers, for taking the proceeds of a lawsuit from a disable victim of an accident. Also when auto safety test are run, they give the results in great detail regardless of which of their advertisers it hurts. They are far more concerned with ratings than how the news will affect advertisers. Because if their ratings are good, the advertisers will come regardless.
If you had been following the US press you would realize that they are not at all friendly toward Bush and the Iraqi war. In fact all except Fox and a few others are usually extremely critical and continually hammer both Bush and Congress daily. So just where do you get off saying that they would not be reporting on Mugabe unless there was something there there the US wants?
Ron Patterson
Very naive, Ron.
The same interests control the media and congress / US gov. They own both. They own you too.
Bl4 or whatever you are called, Congress IS the US Government, or at least a large part of it. And it is not only extremely naive to think the government controls everything, it is just downright dumb. If the government controls the media then the media would not beat up on the government all the time. No government in the history of the world has ever taken the pounding that the press and the US mass media dishes out to our government. They hammer them every chance they get. They hammer them because they deserve it, they hammer them because they are inept and they hammer them because their reading and watching public just love it. The press cater to their subscribers at the expense of those inept fools in government who so justly deserve being exposed for what they are.
But you conspiracy theory wingnuts believe everything is controlled clandestinely by "The Powers That Be" or "The Government" or "The Elites" or " The Bilderberg Group" or "The Trilateral Commission" or "The Bankers" or "The Jewish Conspiracy" or some other crap like that.
All such positions are absolutely silly. But I guess it takes all kinds. You guys sure add a little hilarity in my life.
Ron Patterson
Ron,
You are always so sure about "the world according to Ron". Maybe, just maybe, you should admit that you dont know it all.
You and I had an argument once about the FED directing the buying of shares through Repos and Pomos. You did not even know what it was then, but you argued that they are not "allowed" to do that. Except they did and they are.
Now they financed the buying of a whole company (Bear Stearns), and I have not heard you say a thing about that.
Empty pots make the most noise.
Francois.
IMHO, your conspiracy theory on this subject is based totally on emotion. You strongly desire to believe that e.g. members of the US Congress or Senate are "inept fools". One could quantify exactly how much money per annum being a member of Congress or Senate is worth, and it is huge. The actual salary is dwarfed by the total amount. Inept, stupid people don't just continually fall into money as you need to believe-sure, they are hammered by the MSM for being "inept" just like they call Mozillo "inept".
As far as I am concerned, I have seen way too many laws and tax breaks passed for "special interests".
I feel most congressmen are whores, paid to do the bidding of the payer.
Any politician failing to "play the game" is economically forced to yield his power to one who will.
I do not subscribe to the concept that Members of Congress are inept fools... but I do think they are prostitutes, driven by lobbyists.
The Congressman does what he has to do in his environment to survive.
Unless the people organize a uproar, the lobbyists get their way.
This is the reason we can "justify" things like the Kelo vs. New London crap while simultaneously holding people who share music liable for criminal copyright infringement - even when we promise "justice for all" in exchange for "I pledge Allegiance".
Bit by bit the people are taxed more and more to pay for the largesse of the organizations represented by the lobbyist.
Yes, we have a good government system... but we the people MUST be vigilant. We aren't. We are allowing others to enslave us.
Steve
BrianT
Thank you. One of the downsides of writing in things that talk about real issues is that they are often filled with conspiracy theory nutjobs. Politicians probably dream of having the power that people sometimes give them credit for.
This just reminded me of a story I read that some of the Taliban in Afghanistan thought that we had a kind of "smart dust" that they could get on them and we could then track them from the dust. That would be pretty interesting, wouldn't it?
But you conspiracy theory wingnuts
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Conspiracy Features quotes from 'wingnuts' like:
- Winston Churchill, 1922
- Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913)
- Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation
- Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets.
- Andrew Jackson, letter, April 26, 1824
- Thomas W. Lawson Frenzied Finance, 1905
- Reginald McKenna, President of the Midlands Bank of England
- Professor Carroll Quigley, Tradgey and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, 1966
- Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee
- Grace Commission Report, submitted to President Ronald Reagan on January 15, 1984
- John F. Kennedy, speech at Columbia University, 10 days before his assassination
- Senator Claiborne Pell, Senate Intelligence Committe member, commenting on a USA/USSR treaty signed in 1978
- US Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter
- Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee, June 20, 1932
- John Sherman letter sent to New York bankers, Morton, and Gould, in support of the then proposed National Banking Act,June 25, 1863
― Congressman Louis T. McFadden
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to then Secretary of the Treasury, Albert Gallatin, 1802
― Sir Josiah Stamp - president of the Bank of England in the 1920’s and the second richest man in Britain
― Henry Ford, Sr. — American Developer of the Automobile (Emerging Struggle pg. 165)
― Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of House Banking Committee 1921 through 1931 — in a speech made before the House in 1934
― Robert H. Hemphill (Credit Manager of Federal Reserve Bank, Atlanta, Ga.)
― Congressman Louis McFadden, Chairman of House Comm. on Banking and Currency from 1920 to 1931 (Shadows of Power, pg. 23
― Reginald McKenna, Chancellor of England’s Exchequer, January 1924
― Willis A. Overholser, LL.B - in History of Money in the United States.
All such positions are absolutely silly
Yup. Silly. People like US Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter Winston Churchill are silly gooses.
You guys sure add a little hilarity in my life.
Well, I'm sure all the above quoted people are happy to provide you with snickers and giggles.
Ya Gonna believe me or your lying eyes?
Instead of another peak oil book, read Creature from Jekyll Island next.
I think that book was a standard part of the Liberty Dollar membership.
Ron, it is no conspiracy theory that the US gov't, Executive Branch, controls media. This is simple fact. The NYT sat on the wiretap story for a YEAR. What was the time frame, eh? Let's see they revealed it in 2005... wasn't there an election in... 2004? Given how close the election was, do you think there was a chance it might have turned out differently?
Please. Don't ignore facts due to a visceral reaction to "conspiracy theorists." A few conspiracies we know DID happen: The USS Liberty, Tonkin Gulf, NYT and warrantless wiretapping, extraordinary renditions, Saddam attacked the US!!, the Reichstag fire, Abu Ghraib cover-up, Watergate, Pentagon publishing propaganda as news (current war in Iraq), etc.
I'm always amazed by the "It can't happen NOW" response.
Cheers
Ron, there's a movie call War Made Easy. I saw it a few weeks ago in NY. But it's available on DVD. Watch it.
Or google: cia media control, cia mockingbird, etc.
Or: did you see the David Frost interview with Bhutto where Bhutto identified one of her possible assassins the killer of bin Laden. No? Why not? Did you know that a former Star Wars chief, a asst tres'y secretary and father of Reaganomics (plus many, many others worth noting) accuse the gov't of complicity in 911? How much do you see about the depleted uranium being dumped over Iraq and Afghanistan? (I'm not talking about being sympathetic to any of this -- just about reporting it!)
Or try http://www.projectcensored.org/
I cannot believe what I'm hearing. Do you honestly believe that there is a free press in the United States? Maybe there is in the so-called "free speech zones", where people can say what they want in the middle of nowhere so long as nobody is around to hear them. American media is consolidated into very few hands. About 6 for-profit (right-wing) corporations control the vast majority of what Americans see on television. And since 1975, 2/3 of independent newspapers have vanished. Very few liberal voices are left in main stream media. And the Bush administrarion is very supportive of loosening the rules even further to allow for more consolidation. So I believe the truth is somewhere in the middle of your arguments. It is unlikely that leading government officials sit in their thrones and dictate what will be shown on every channel and in every newspaper, but the press certainly is not free (at least the major names that are widely watched). I mean, FOX news was still reporting that WMDs had been found in Iraq as late as July 2004. It is no wonder that so many Americans live in the dark about what is actually going on in the world. Consolidation has dramatically affected the quality and diversity of information available to the public.
Okay, I am not going to respond to any more of you conspiracy theory wingnuts, people who believe everything that is printed or broadcast in the media is controlled by...by....somebody. (Almost every wingnut has a different media controller.) Hell, I do have my standards you know. I have set the bar very low as to the type of post I will respond to. And most of the responses I read are way below that.
Ron Patterson
Okay, I am not going to respond to any more of you conspiracy theory wingnuts
IS that a promise?
Hell, I do have my standards you know.
Yes, that would be calling heads of state and court members 'silly'.
Good thing we'll never hear you comment on this JFK quote about the press and government interaction:
http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/S...
And a bit later....
Can't you find a different forum for this stuff?
When Ron stops with his position of 'all conspiracy talk is silly' - I won't have to dig up people for Ron to call silly.
All this conspiracy talk among people who believe in global warming? I believe in global warming myself, but there are people that say global warming doesn't exist and that it's a conspiracy to move create emissions controls that would move jobs to other countries that don't have emissions regulations, among others. The government/"others paying off scientists to say there is an issue that isn't real is more plausible than the government controling the media, the economy, and all political dialogue to serve "themselves".
Head, meet sand.
There is a free press in the United States. Just because the press isn't run the way you want, and doesn't cover the stories you want, doesn't mean there isn't a free press. If you want to know the difference between the presence and absence of a free press, there are plenty of countries you can visit. Your rhetoric comes from a seriously parochial perspective.
There is a free press in the United States.
Really?
As one of the Presidents said:
And your point is what, exactly?
A president asking reporters not to act as the enemy's forward observation officers does not mean the press isn't free. Again, if you would like to learn what it means not to have a free press, there are plenty of countries you can visit.
For the daily cost of the Iraq War ($343,000,000 per day), 9,800 homes could be electrified with 4kW solar electric systems each day. For the yearly cost of the Iraq War ($125,000,000,000 per year), 3,557,000 homes could be electrified with 4kW solar electric systems each year. For the total appropriated cost of the Iraq War ($607,000,000,000 through FY08), 17,342,857 homes could have been electrified with 4kW solar electric systems.
Sources and Calculations:
*Congressman Murtha on the daily cost of the War in Iraq: http://www.murtha.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=39...
*Congressional Joint Economic Committee on the total appropriated cost of the War in Iraq: http://www.jec.senate.gov/Documents/Releases/11.13.07IraqReportRelease.pdf
Number of Residential Solar Electric (PV) Systems Installed
- $8.75 per Watt Installed is the current cost of residential solar electric systems
- 4,000 Watt Solar Electric System installed is $35,000 ($8.75 x 4,000)
- $343,000,000 / $35,000 = 9,800 Residential Solar Systems Installed Per Day
- $125,000,000,000 / $35,000 = 3,577,000 Residential Solar Systems Installed Per Year
- $607,000,000,000 / $35,000 = 17,342,857 Residential Solar Systems Installed through FY08
Calculating Total Solar Electric Power Production
- Total System Size (kW) Installed per Day for $393 Million = 39,200 (4kW x 9,800 systems)
- Total System Size (kW) Installed per Year for $1.25 Billion = 14,308,000 (4kW x 3,577,000 systems)
- Total System Size (kW) Installed through FY08 for $607 Billion = 69,371,429 (4kW x 17,342,857 systems)
- Hours of "Peak" Sunlight per Day = 4.47 (From NOAA Database)
- Conversion Efficiency = 0.77 (Industry standard assumption)
- kW-Hours (kWh) per Day Generated for $343 Million = 134,922 (kW Installed per Day x Peak Sun Hours per Day x Conversion Efficiency)
- kWh Generated per Day for $125 Billion = 49,246,705 (kW Installed per Year x Peak Sun Hours per Day x Conversion Efficiency)
- kWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion = 238,769,520 (Total kW Installed for $607 Billion x Peak Sun Hours per Day x Conversion Efficiency)
- kWh Generated per Year for $607 Billion = 87,150,874,800 (kWh per Day Generated for $607 Billion x 365)
- MW-Hours (MWh) Generated per Day for $343 Million = 135 (Total kWh Generated per Day for $343 Million/1000)
- MWh Generated per Day for $125 Billion = 49,247 (Total kWh Generated per Day for $125 Billion/1000)
- MWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion = 238,770 (Total kWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion/1000)
- MWh Generated per Year for $607 Billion = 87,150,875 ((Total kWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion/1000) x 365)
Solar Electric Power produced over 30 Years
- 9,800 PV Installations in kWh/Year x 30 Years = 1,477,401,156 (kWh Generated per Day for $343 Million x 365 days x 30 years)
- 3,577,000 PV Installations in kWh/Year x 30 Years = 539,251,421,970 (kWh Generated per Day for $125 Billion x 365 days x 30 years)
- 17,342,857 PV Installations in kWh/Year x 30 Years = 2,614,526,244,000 (kWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion x 365 days x 30 years)
- 9,800 PV Installations in MWh/Year x 30 Years = 1,477,401 ((kWh Generated per Day for $343 Million x 365 days x 30 years)/1000)
- 3,577,000 PV Installations in MWh/Year x 30 Years = 539,251,422 ((kWh Generated per Day for $125 Billion x 365 days x 30 years)/1000)
- 17,342,857 PV Installations in MWh/Year x 30 Years = 2,614,526,244 ((kWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion x 365 days x 30 years)/1000)
You can cut a hell of a lot of cost out of that by using micro systems and having individuals/communities build their own.
I can build a solar over that will go to nearly 300F for ten bucks.
You can build a windmill for a few hundred bucks - or less.
Cheers
Methinks the bad energy policy from Washington has spanned many Congresses, party majorities, and presidents since Ford and Carter. For many moons they have been going out of their way around our mountain of coal here in America and our ability to build massive solar and LNG infrastructure to make us dependent on politically unstable crude with its ELM problems. And when they do decide to take massive action, we get corn ethanol, no foreign oil displacement, and massive food inflation from them. It's like they are doing nearly all they can to create an oil crisis.
And an economic crisis.
Hmm.....
I guess to a turkey other turkeys look different but here in the 'whole' world Republican an Democrat birds look the same, just more trouble. War and debt, that is what the world gets from both those parties.
That American Experiment or narcissist's wet dream is some big failure. Wouldn't it be nice to sweep all it's failed apparatus into that trash can called history? Methinks, Ron Patterson, you could start looking for something that cooks the lab book for more than a select few.
CrystalRadion, did you not understand a word of that last sentence?
Get that Crystal, the whole damn world! That was my exact point, that this is not a problem for just the US but a problem for the entire world. And the second half of that sentence was pure sarcasm. That being said, I do not need to start looking for something that cooks the lab books for the entire world, I know exactly where the fault lies. To quote John Gray: It is a consequence of the evolutionary success of an exceptionally rapacious primate.
No one is to blame CrystalRadio, the human population stumbled upon the detritus of millions of years of past life. This supplied us with massive amounts of food and energy. The extra food enabled our population to explode. Also all that extra energy enabled us to create the means by which to employ and keep alive the massive population that all that extra food begat.
There are no villains in this drama CR, only victims.
Ron Patterson
You know what, Ron Patterson? I think you just summed up the situation in a nutshell. I think yours is one of the most rational & accurate posts I've read on here. (And Nate claims I never agree with anybody...)
"There are no villains in this drama CR, only victims."
The Republican house leader sure as shit is a villain in the piece, as is everyone else engaged in the game of obfuscation in order to realize their personal aims of political power or personal wealth.
Liars are villains, not victims.
VERY good, Ron, I'm saving that paragraph to quote you, it's remarkably succint & salient....
yet what I added in my mind was that there also are no evil geniuses and massive conspiracies, only poor fools doing what it feels good to do. And the victims may be the other species.
kudos.
You blame OIL!?
Sorry but without villains you have no drama, but maybe you are right and we live within a farce and we will never rise above being and making monkeys of ourselves.
In that low comedy of course we never blame ourselves or the leaders. The USA has behaved badly as a world leader and NO this is not some delusion on my part, it has played it's role worse than the British Empire did. But there can be no blame attached when the wise make and sell salad shooters of Kunstler to 'Joe Six Pack'. (By the way I really have an issue about how many on this site tend to view the common man as 'Joe Six Pack' shit when you don't have respect for your own countrymen how can anyone else have respect for you, very elitist and twerpy that!) Anyway about the US (leave Canada's sins, of which there are many, out for now) Kyoto was a real turning point and went south when the US walked away but of course it is all genetic so none to blame, God made us do it.
Sorry it won't wash, I don't buy the crap that there are no villains. To those who have been given much, much is expected. We have been given much and wasted it and we wont get it back with lame things like it aint me it's the whole world , I aint to blame Mama everybody was doing it. I think many nations would try to accept their responsibilities and many do try but the USA (and Canada) and us as individuals are not even trying, yet we use the greater part of the worlds goodies. Ah Phooey!
CrystalRadio, either you cannot read or you cannot comprehend what you have just read. Here is what I wrote: I know exactly where the fault lies. To quote John Gray: It is a consequence of the evolutionary success of an exceptionally rapacious primate. Now does that sound like I am blaming oil?
We owe the overcrowding of the earth, the destruction of our environment, to our evolutionary success as a species. We are competing with every other species on earth for food and territory, and we are winning, big time! We behave this way because such behavior led to our survival as a species over millions of years of evolution.
It just happened. It was just natural that once we found this detritus that we spend it. We did it because it was just in our nature to do so. We used it to produce massive amounts of food and trinkets. That has made us fat and wealthy. It was just the natural thing for us to do. If there are villains then they are us. That is, the villains are Homo sapiens.
We have met the enemy and he is us. Pogo
Ron Patterson
John Gray is wrong.
If we were an especially rapacious primate, only concerned with bettering ourselves at someone or something else's expense, the tribal model would never have worked and we'd already have died out.
For the last several thousand years, the cooperative social structure inherent to our origins has been broken by civilization's unmanageable complexity, and we've shored up the damage through hierarchical manipulation of ever-increasing resource usurpation from outside our system.
The overcrowding, the mass extinctions, the depletion of natural resources, the soiling of the ecosystem, and the changing of the climate are all unintended consequences of our inability to effectively meet the ever-increasing levels of complexity which resulted from previous "solutions".
Unfortunately, there's no way to go back to the sustainable tribal model given where we are now.
There are only two choices:
1. A hybrid tribal-civilized model which would self-organize the way all sustainable living mechanisms do.
2. Extinction.
To meet choice #1, we would at a minimum need to give up our dreams of absolute control and our fears of the inevitable.
We are currently headed for choice #2 at blinding speed.
$deity i hate these black and white views..
'it was advantageous to fight other tribes of humans to survive'
'it was advantageous to co-operate with other tribes of humans to survive'
in reality neither are completely false, view one is true when resources were limited and 'scattered' in a wide area, in this case any two groups meeting each other can't tolerate the other's presence least it doom's BOTH to death. similar to two pack's of wolves who's territory overlap in a area that can only support one.
view two is true when either resources are abundant in a area, co-operation would allow the gathering of allot more then they would both normally be able to gather. or when resources are scarce but not scattered over a wide area, this would also allow them to maximize the use of said resources.
"Sorry but without villains you have no drama..."
"But there can be no blame attached when the wise make and sell salad shooters of Kunstler to 'Joe Six Pack'. (By the way I really have an issue about how many on this site tend to view the common man as 'Joe Six Pack' shit...very elitist and twerpy that!)"
"We have been given much and wasted it and we wont get it back with lame things like it aint me it's the whole world , I aint to blame Mama everybody was doing it."
OK, Crystal, I'll buy the implied point that absolute genetic determinism is going a little too far.
But now I've wiped away the crocodile tears for the poor, abused Joe and Jane Sixpack, Fred Nurk, M. Untel, Mme. Unetelle, Jan Janssen, or whoever, all of whom eagerly lap up Kunstler's salad shooters, to say nothing of limitless quantities of moronic teevee rubbish and much else. So I'm ready to ask: do Joe, Jane, and the others share in any way in the responsibility for their condition, or does responsibility fall only on "the wise", with Joe and Jane riding along strictly as idiot passengers? The second and third quotes from your essay seem to contradict each other on that point.
As to that second quote, I will assert that if Joe and Jane are such stupid schmucks that it is unfair to expect them to take any part of the responsibility, then they don't deserve any respect. And I will also observe that not just in the USA, but in many European and other countries, the very law holds them unworthy of respect. For one example among many, strict regulations on political campaigns, regulations that make a mockery of freedom of speech, are premised precisely on the notion that Joe, Jane, Untel, Unetelle, and all the rest, are such sorry specimens of foolish unthinking rubbish that not only is it unfair to expect that they could ever see past the money, but it is unfair to such a fantastic degree that it is actually best to have the incumbents appoint staff to commissions to ration political speech.
Given those attitudes in the law - to say nothing of simple common sense - in the event I need anything demanding knowledge and care - anything from bicycle repair to brain surgery - I will surely go to an expert - a member of the elite - and certainly not to Joe, Jane, or Untel. As will Jane, Joe, and Untel, and for even the most trivial matters. After all, they know themselves, so day in and day out, for example, they happily fork over vast sums to multimillionaires to entertain them, rather than try to set their own empty minds at finding something to do. So I airily dismiss your complaint about elitism as nothing more than politically-correct bullshnarkey.
BTW, as to Kyoto, it looks more and more like most of the European signatories are doing just what Europeans almost always seem to do: making grand pious noises in public while doing precisely as they please in private. At least the US Senate, such as it is, had the gumption to turn the stinking thing down 95-0 rather than play foolish pretend games. And anyway, who cares, as the only responsibility Kyoto assigned to most of the world was to sit around on their behinds and rake in monetary handouts (though I do wonder how much of that largess will actually be forthcoming.) IOW it's a load of cobblers.
So yes, phooey indeed!
Oh dear, I think I must be in the presence of a bloated plutocrat worth millions of dollars for every brain cell he has or else just another poor mug who has been had. I think you have made my point better than anything I could say. Thanks pal:)
Sorry PaulS, that was rather unkind and of course superficial, but go look up what has happened just since the repeal of Breton Woods as an instance. Breton Woods was good for all Americans but not so good for the few responsible for removing it. Take a snapshot of Breton Woods America and another of today's America without it and see what YOU think. The elite in America today is not an intellectual elite.
Oops that's two t's in Bretton. I must be richer than I thought!
No, no, NO, you've got it ass-backwards. It's really 'There are no VICTIMS, only VILLAINS.'
We all deserve what we get. And we should have gotten it much, much sooner.
It looks like most of that increase in US imports from OPEC is simply due to the fact that Angola joined OPEC in 2007. So oil imports from Angola shifted from the non-OPEC column in 2006 to the OPEC column in 2007:
which implies over 2/3 of the increase in dependence is simply a result of this Angola shift. If so, it's to say the last pretty dishonest of Blunt to try to score policital points from that 57.6% number.