69 comments on Oil Rises, Gasoline Climbs to a Record, on U.S. Supply Decline
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
69 comments on Oil Rises, Gasoline Climbs to a Record, on U.S. Supply Decline
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction - Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The infrastructure of suburbia can be described as the greatest misallocation of resources in the history of the world.”
—JH Kunstler
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Ehh let’s see ehh, think of a number ... shoot wrong again !
Anyone, what is this guesswork good for? Is this guesswork (on an average) good or bad for the stock-exchange? Why not skip these utterly stupid exercises and just face reality every Wednesday?
95% of all financial media is total BS-why should energy reporting be any different?
But Sir, these data are from our democratic government!! Surely you aren't implying that Gee Dubyah would actually LIE to the 'merikan sheeple! Wouldn't that be grounds for impeachment?
{sarcasm off}
E. Swanson
BrianT, see my question - do you have any proposals.
What is this oil-stock-guesswork once a week good for?
Why not every day (more detail) or every month (less noize) ??
(Suggestions appreciated)
I have far more confidence in the reporting of the data from the EIA than most other sources. As they stressed, over and over again during the two-day Conference in DC, their data gathering procedures (and the statistical approach they take) is pretty straight forward.
It's their projections that leave something to be desired.
Great data, not so great projections in a number of areas. They (the EIA, and Guy Caruso in particular) offered some reasons as to why this has been so and what they are doing to address a projection approach that is and has been dominated by demand side factors as opposed to the supply side.
Yesterday afternoon, there was some fairly technical and astute observations of the macroeconomics trends, why some "signals"s seen in the past aren't having the same the effect (or perhaps it was more accurate to say a greater delay)that they did in the past.
Those of us whom stayed to the "bitter-end" heard some interesting observations on vicious cycle (sounds like positive feedback) that we are now in.