New record:

Oil prices above $112 as supplies fall

NEW YORK - The price of oil has surged to a new record, with a barrel a crude trading above $112 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

$2 to Triple Yergin (Tapis is already over Triple Yergin).

(just for the record)

We have a local Yerginite in Norway as well.
Mr Arnstein Wigestrand in SEB Enskilda (a bank) and he is naming himself "an expert in the field of oil-price-analysis" (hehehe, good one )

Now, Mr Wigestrand's AVERAGE prediction for the "year of the lord" 2008 , is 55$. That number was decided late 2007. Now, as of April 3rd, he has index-regulated this due to the falling dollar, so running average is set to 65$ for the year 2008(!)

http://www.dn.no/energi/article1371695.ece
(norwegian language alert, but you will understand the word kollaps and recognize those numbers..:-) )

Crude buying is still being driven by dollar weakness as the greenback searches for new lows against the Euro today.

As for Yergin, I strongly suspect that the sophisticated model on which he projected his $60 price (I am kidding) did not also project a 20% drop against the Euro over the last 12 months, or a flight to commodities by fund managers hoping to protect capital against inflation of the U.S. dollar and a falling stock market.

Should the U.S. dollar correct itself, crude will fall quickly and hard on the reduced demand for product by a U.S. economy in recession. Prices will reflect the fundamental balance of supply and demand. At some point, they always do.

The spec long position in crude oil is tiny as a % of total position. I will try and find graphic and or link. Far far higher on gold and grains.

I don't doubt that as a % of trading volume, there is less spec in crude than gold or grain right now. (I suspect that that's always been the case with gold, but that grain is a new development.) However, I don't believe it's a "tiny %". I'd love to see the data.

Should the U.S. dollar correct itself,

That's what it's been doing.

Now you know why the UK didn't join the Euro.

Just like in the USA, the exchange rate is good for some states and very bad for others - expect the Euro to disintegrate if this carries on for very long.

So right, DD. Even then, I had a good chuckle. Thanks.

Prices will reflect the fundamental balance of supply and demand.

Supply has been flat for several years and demand has continued to increase. In my book, that means the fundamentals support rising prices. Which is good because that theory matches reality, so I can't share your cognitive disconnect.

"Should the U.S. dollar correct itself, crude will fall quickly and hard on the reduced demand for product by a U.S. economy in recession"

Currencies do not have a history of "correcting themselves". Currency being inanimate has no ability to care whether it is correct or not.

Currency values have to be corrected by policy correction and market action. Right now there is no sign of policy correction as the American taxpayers are being given a token check of some $600 to shut us up and keep us happy (talk about your silver bb, fuel and food prices have increased enough to swallow that up),and we are still carrying the 1 trillion dollar "war of weeks, not months" on our backs.

But, when that golden day comes when we do see a rebound in the dollar, your right, commodities of all types will fall, and possibly very fast and hard (ala 1982). The only way that will happen of course is if end the cost of the war (one way or the other, win lose or draw, the currency don't care, just end the cost) and per Paul Volker's example in the early 1980's go to a high interest policy to shake out the excess.

The problem is, it is going to HURT LIKE HELL. High interest will surely sink the economy into a hard recession, and the collapse in commodities prices will leave many financial houses, hedge funds and LLP's holding the bag...many of these are the same ones who just got short on the housing crisis, and before that the dot com crisis and before that the Asian bond crisis and before that the S&L crisis...and before...well you get the picture.

The good news is that oil consumption should see a collapse in demand the likes of which has not been seen since the early eighties, and for awhile we will be swimming in the stuff. and Yergin will finally be right, but a decade late, making his advice worth nothing. The bad news is, even though swimming in oil, probably relatively cheap oil (in real, not nominal terms), not many of us will be able to afford to buy much of it. Many of us will have already found alternatives to it in the one remaining area that it matters in, being transportation. By the way, natural gas, the fuel that matters most in the long view...as of an hour ago, nat gas was up 3.70% to over $10.00, while crude was up "only" 2.98%. Ahhh, natural gas, the fuel that is now used to cleanse Diesel fuel and fuel the ethanol future...it's starting to look like time to build that electric car even if you have to build it yourself out of the scrap pile.
RC

RC: Yes, it is just like 1982. Once the USA straightens up, everything will be A-OK. China is just a rice bowl economy and India is nothing. We will be swimming in crude as those economies are totally reliant on our greatness-if China would just strengthen the Yuan quicker (currently at a 17% per annum clip) everything would be rosey as the trade deficit does a 180. Don't worry about the effect on crude prices of a dramatically strengthened currency of the world's most dominant industrial economy-that is just negative thinking.They don't have what we have (whatever that is).

Roger has been singing this song for at least three years now. He used to predict Saudi Arabia would "open the floodgates" "real soon now" and flood the world with cheap oil again but he's quietly been backing away from that absurd prediction for the last 18 months or so. KSA may not have yet collapsed as some here expected but it sure as hell isn't flooding the world with cheap oil. And under the circumstances I am not sure why KSA would even do such a silly thing. Most of KSA's oil can be produced very cheaply so at $112 per barrel, KSA appears to be profiting $100-$105 per barrel. KSA loves it when demand shoves prices higher and brings marginal producers onstream. KSA can make tons more money selling 8.7 mbpd at $112 per barrel than they can selling 12 mbpd or even 15 mbpd at $38 per barrel (or whatever other "cheap" figure Roger might throw out there).

Wow. 345 billion a year in pure profit.

Cheers

Grey, how ya' been?

Well, I'm afraid you may have stepped in it again when you said,

"KSA may not have yet collapsed as some here expected but it sure as hell isn't flooding the world with cheap oil. And under the circumstances I am not sure why KSA would even do such a silly thing."

Am I to assume that you now accept my original argument that KSA may be willfully restraining production so as not to undercut oil prices, and that is possible (though by no means assured) that they may have the ability to raise production after all? Hmmmm...

That's eerily like my original contention, although my argument alwas was that they don't have to withhold oil per se, they just have to stall making needed capital investment for awhile in new projects and reworking of oil fields...

Nice to see you and I are on the same side in this discussion, Grey.

The Saudi's are doing what we would do in similiar circumstances...what any bird hunter would call "flushing" out the prey. KSA will soon be able to tell who the competitors are, how much oil they can deliver, how much it will cost them to deliver it, and what alternatives to oil may be out there that have a chance of gaining investment.

If they have the possible production to spare, we will know it when we reach the maximum level of pain we can bear, and make the sacrifice to invest in alternatives. They need to make sure we are fully committed to the expensive alternatives, and cannot back out easily. Then they will pull the trigger, and we will see if they have any ammo left in the oil gun.

I don't know much, but I do know this: We are NO WHERE NEAR the level of maximum pain yet. If you don't believe me, go and drive down any interstate highway, or go by your local Mercedes Benz dealer and shop for the C class car with the 451 horsepower engine (and that's the middle of the range, the mass market car...don't even ask about the really powerful S class stuff!)

"KSA can make tons more money selling 8.7 mbpd at $112 per barrel than they can selling 12 mbpd or even 15 mbpd at $38 per barrel (or whatever other "cheap" figure Roger might throw out there)."

That may be a number that Yergin would throw out there. Roger never would. If there is one thing I pray for it's that we never see the catastrophic effects of $38 oil. $200 per barrel oil would do the nation and the world far less damage than $38 per barrel oil.

And the Saudi's know it. That's why their ability to produce big, if it exists (and we have absolutely no way to know), is a more dangerous thing by far than the immediate risk of them peaking.

Be very careful of both scenarios.

RC

RC

Brian,

The difference I see in your view and my view is that you seem to think that when I say commodities prices could collapse and at least for some time we may well end up with a glut of oil brought on by a hard recession as me predicting good times.

My view is a bit different. I see a decline in oil prices and oversupply of oil as a bad thing, and if it is large enough in magnitude and occurs in too short a time, a very bad thing.

We know what happens in periods of that type. Again, look at the 1980's. The U.S. had less than one trillion dollars in debt when Ronald Reagan took office. Over 200 years, less than a trillion dollars debt. Following 8 years, about 4 trillion. Could we survive economically if a rise in national debt were to occur of that magnitude from the current high levels we already carry? What do you think, BrianT?

If oil prices fall dramatically, do you think ANY of us can resist that nice RV or that great sexy high speed cabin cruiser yacht with the twin turbocharged engines...or at least a 12 cylinder car, 'ell, you only live once! $38 per barrel oil, hell, I admit it, I would go shopping for one last gasp of the great internal combustion romance! If the last of the cheap fossil fuel era lasted only another decade, that would be longer than most of the gas engined powered junk lasts nowadays anyway! Put it on my tab, I'm an old man anyway, what do I care about debt?

If one believes that carbon release is a problem, how in the world can one hope for cheap oil? $38 per barrel oil would set off the great final "carbon luxury bath" that would make the 1980's and 90's look like the "green" era, and this time it would be worldwide, with China and India trying to look like 1980's New York or So Cal in the "glory days" of turn of the century America.

We have not even discussed the investment community, who now finding out that the safest investment in the world, that being real estate, which WOULD NEVER DECLINE IN PRICE, did in fact decline in price, has now ran like cowards to the NEW safest investment in the world, WHICH WILL NEVER DECLINE IN PRICE, that being raw materials, commodities, and best of all oil and gas. Hey, how can you lose on oil and gas, God ain't making any more of it! Sound familiar?

Of course, the problem is, they are not putting their own money into this new SAFE investment. By conduit of the hedge funds and the buyout LLP kings and the mutual fund genuises, the banks and brokers and "advisors" have the endowments of Universities poured in, the retirement funds of city workers, the funds of charitable foundations, and the average schmuck who has never bought an oil future in his life and the office girl who says to her broker, "here, you invest it, I know you know what your doing." All pouring billions into the wacky world of oil futures. Does any of this sound familiar? (sigh)

What is needed is some sanity. Some stability. When oil was around $85 or $95 dollars per barrel, I said then what I will say now. I would be perfectly content if it stayed within a couple of bucks of that range, inflation adjusted, for the rest of my natural life. What IDIOT wants oil back at $38 bucks a barrel, killing the possibility of alternatives, killing the incentive to at least be sensible, killing the return on investment for E&P in the energy industy?

No BrianT, when I describe the possibility of a commodities price collapse and a possible glut (albeit temporary)of oil, I am NOT describing everything "A-OK" as you so flippantly say. Just the opposite. The least of our problems will not be China or India or the Yuan. China and India with two billion plus mouths to feed, all hungering for USA 1990 will be THIER problem, and the worlds.

Our problem will be an economic wipeout that will make this whipped up "sub-prime" hysteria look like the dog and pony show that it is when we see trillions of dollars of "commodity" investment disappear overnight and oil consumption shoot through the roof as the alternative renewable energy programs, our only avenues into the future collapse into bankruptcy.

There are events that can occur in the world that are EVERY BIT AS DANGEROUS AS PEAK OIL.

It may not seem like it now, but the day may come when we pray for oil at $100 per barrel. All I ask is for folks to realize that we may be praying because oil is so much higher than $100. Or because it is so much cheaper. One is as dangerous as the other if it happens too fast. The difference is this: The hapless public is at least made aware of possible danger by expensive oil. Cheap oil is like an anesthetic that knocks us out so that our throats can be slit in our sleep. In which case do you think we at least have a fighting chance?

RC

RC: You could give Alan Greenspan a run for his money.

Agreed that currencies to do correct magically. However, I foresee a time in the near future when the ECB and BoE are going to have to start/accelerate the rate cutting. That will weaken the Euro and Pound against the U.S. dollar sending it back up.

Prices will reflect the fundamental balance of supply and demand. At some point, they always do.

I agree. I expect to see a continued accelerating decline rate in net oil exports, and as forced energy conservation moves up the food chain, I expect to see an accelerating increase in prices, as the bidding between oil importers gets tougher. If we "only" see a 24%/year rate of increase, half of what we are currently seeing, oil prices would double every three years.

I believe the overvalued US dollar IS currently correcting itself...