25 comments on Maryland Legislation Taps Energy Efficiency as the "First Fuel"
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
25 comments on Maryland Legislation Taps Energy Efficiency as the "First Fuel"
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“What people need to hear loud and clear is that we're running out of energy in America.”
—George W. Bush, May 2001
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Neven,
I think Bloomberg just made a mistake.
Aramco's official source says a 250 kbd expansion on Dec 2008 bringing Shaybah's total capacity to 750 kbd.
http://www.saudiaramco.com/irj/go/km/docs/SaudiAramcoPublic/FactsAndFigu...
Bloomberg's article does say that "Aramco will add a further 250,000 barrels a day by the end of the year when its 500,000 barrel-a-day Shaybah oil field expansion..." So the first part of their sentence is right.
What is interesting in Bloomberg's article is that Khursaniyah will only produce 300 kbd but "will eventually add 500,000 barrels a day to the country's production capacity". Maybe Khursaniyah will only ever produce 300 kbd.
Ace
The 300kbpd is on start up, so possibly they will ramp up (as you have said before). The bigger question is how do they get to 12mbpd by the end of 2009? Close on an increase of 3mbpd from what they did in 2007 and just over 2 mbpd of megaprojects, so no decline and more than their telling us? I'd appreciate your take on it.
Neven
Neven,
The short answer is that Aramco won't be producing 12 mbd of crude, although they might say they have the capacity. Please refer to some of the jokes on capacity by westexas.
http://www.theoildrum.com/user/westexas
Aramco’s new project additions do not offset the natural production declines of their existing fields as shown by the chart below. In addition, Aramco’s so-called surplus capacity is heavy oil which can’t be produced since there is not enough surplus refinery capacity to process their heavy oil. Consequently, Aramco’s production will, at best, remain on a plateau for the next couple of years.
Saudi Arabia Crude Oil & Lease Condensate Production to 2080 - click to enlarge
For a long answer please read section 5 of my Feb 2008 oil forecast
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3623
For more info please read my story on Saudi Arabia’s use of propaganda which includes a detailed discussion on discovered oil in place and recovery factors.
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3665