<Crude Oil: how high can it go? (19th century whaling as a model for oil depletion and price volatility) The Oil Drum Australia: What to do, what to do about our energy situation?>

30 comments on Abqaiq and Eat It Too (or, More Geological Analysis of Potential Saudi Depletion)

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version

garyp on May 15, 2008 - 11:35am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Even if everything else was full zone 1 thickness, that's still just 1.9Gbarrels. Even if the yellow area is full thickness remaining, it still looks by eye to be well past 60-70% - and that's 1993, let alone now. Hanifa from your own words looks to be based on some serious wishful thinking in terms of projections vs troubles encountered.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
elwoodelmore on May 15, 2008 - 11:54am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

what is uerr ? i am assuming it means ultimate economic recoverable reserves ?

but that is ksa speak.

recoverable reserves are taken, by the sec at least, to mean remaining reserves. oil that has already been produced is not called reserves.
maybe uero (ultimate economic recoverable oil)would be more definitive.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
JoulesBurn on May 15, 2008 - 12:09pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

UERR is somewhat of a contradiction.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
JoulesBurn on May 15, 2008 - 12:44pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

I hear ya, Gary. Using their production figures, an additional 2.9 Gb was produced from 1993-2006, and that had to come from somewhere. They had a similar thickness map (though with 3D perspective) from 2006 that had less yellow but still there.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

30 comments on Abqaiq and Eat It Too (or, More Geological Analysis of Potential Saudi Depletion)

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version