![]() | UPDATED: The Oil Market's Historic Swing to Continuous Contango--Has Peak Oil "Tipped"? | The Oil Drum | Oilwatch Monthly - May 2008 | ![]() |
43 comments on Peak Oil - Whom to Believe? Part 1 - There's Plenty of Oil, CERAiously
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
43 comments on Peak Oil - Whom to Believe? Part 1 - There's Plenty of Oil, CERAiously
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Streets: Utilitarian Corridors or Livable Public Space
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
TOD:Europe
- Oilwatch Monthly - November 2008
- The 2008 IEA WEO - Production Decline Rates
- The EU Strategic Energy Review: maybe not so depressing after all
TOD:Canada
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
TOD:ANZ
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel.”
—Saudi saying
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
My wife and I saw this all coming nearly 30 years ago and decided to have only one child, aborting a second. The wisdom of our decision is now clearly apparent.
Somewhere in an alternate universe a 30 year old physicist finally solves the cold fusion problem and calls home to tell his proud parents.
Even if we had cold fusion, the idea of continuing a growth based BAU type economy/society is a complete waste. There will ALWAYS be limits to growth and the continuation of this type of thing. cold fusion or whatever you have, your still putting off bigger problems for later, there is only so much land area and arable food. The problem with the world is we are relentlessly pursuing growth and are encountering diminishing marginal returns, this is a problem only we, not technology, will solve.
Back in this universe, there is no way that a 30 year old physicist is going to get something usable from the Cold Fusion effect. Firstly, because the youngest guy in the field that I know of is 48 - all the potential young people have got scared off by the severe career damage that results - and secondly because all the research that can be done on a shoestring has already been done. Cold fusion is a quantum nanotechnology / surface physics phenomenon, and only a really well-funded lab or corporation could do meaningful work in this area. Thirdly, the CF / LENR community represents a much smaller fraction of the science community (i.e. no more than about 40 active research groups worldwide) than does Peak Oil in its corner.
TOD-ers, you have no idea what it is to struggle against a really dominant cultural paradigm, believe me.
My point was murdering a child in the name of peak oil might be counter productive. We may need that individual. By all means use protection and birth control, but to try to place some noble afterthought on abortion that they were trying to help the environment is crap.
The same ethics could be used to unplug all the people on life support, then kill all that can't or won't work. Or maybe we just let the next SARS sweep the aerth and kind of thin the herd you know?
I did get your point, and it is a fair and valid one, but I couldn't let an opportunity to plug Cold Fusion (my favourite subject) go by.
Sorry for being such a philistine.
How sad.
Yes how Sad...that you would need to heap guilt on. Here is an interesting video for you:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1484635787266506285
A rush to judgement stems from an inability to express empathy...
As soon as a society devalues children and human life in general enough to either stop reproducing or killing children outright, that society is truly doomed Or as Spock would probably say (just watched Star Trek 4 with my THREE beautiful/intelligent children) "it is illogical to kill your own children, or work for the extinction of your own species"