219 comments on Dmitry Orlov's Book--Reinventing Collapse: The Soviet Example and American Prospects
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
219 comments on Dmitry Orlov's Book--Reinventing Collapse: The Soviet Example and American Prospects
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“No civilization can survive the physical destruction of its resource base.”
—Bruce Sterling
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
What are you saying? we can't truly make solar with solar yet or maybe ever..
Right, what I am saying is even if we can manufacture solar panels using solar panels, we can't transport them or mine the material to make them without solar power..
I don't follow.
I am saying that if we can manufacture solar power with solar power, we would also have to mine the materials ect and transport them using solar power, or else your not truly using solar power. We can't get away from fossil fuels like one would think.
You seem to keep passing over nuclear.
The world is not going to be all solar for a long time, if ever.
Or are you looking at theoretical solutions to problems we might have thousands of years in the future?
The world is not going to be all solar for a long time, if ever.
DaveMart - the world *IS* Solar.
Coal, oil, wind, water - all expressions of energy from sol. (ok, ok. Wind also has a spinning globe effect.)
No matter what the source of energy, the energy conversion capital equipment must produce enough excess useful energy above consumption needs to be self-sustaining. Since fossil fuels are such high-quality sources with relatively cheap conversion capital (including refining and transport) they have been self-sustaining. The problem is they are not renewable, hence peak oil, etc. In order to expand energy production you need excess energy to mine, form, and construct the conversion capital (not to mention maintenance). These are the questions we need to answer about any proposed alternative energy production technology. Is the conversion capital self-sustaining, or does it need subsidization? If the latter, it probably isn't a good choice.
George
electric vehicles charged from solar panels.
Where can I buy one of those?
The development of fossil fuel technologies in the 18th and 19th centuries was initiated through the use of biomass energy (a relatively inefficient form of solar energy) mostly in the form of food for workers and animals. With 21st century knowledge even more efficient solar energy utilization methods can be used to grow a solar based economy. Concentrated solar thermal can be used directly to melt metals and glass in order to make parts for more CSP systems.
We could eliminate the requirement for biomass consumption by downloading our conciousness-es into solar powered android bodies and giant orbital solar reflectors would beam sunshine down upon us 24 hrs a day. Our positronic brains would be much faster so we would need to learn Dolphin to speak to each other.
This technology is only 5 years away, perhaps 10.
I love it!!! Where do I sign up? Can our pets become androids too?
Experimenting with brain downloads is Educational and Entertaining.
It's EduTainment!
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=4107853
http://www.mcon.org/
Learn Dolphin here
http://www.speakdolphin.com/
LOL @ the peace flag photo...
thomas deplume -
As you probably know, many here at TOD hold the view that we can't get from Here to There because we are presently dependent upon a dying technology, i.e., the burning of fossil fuels to produce useful work. They say that we can't go solar, wind, etc. in a big way because a significant amount of fossil fuel is required to create the infrastructure for such systems.
I say that this view is sorely off base. If one studies the history of technology, one sees that new technologies don't just suddenly snap into being like spring flowers. Rather, they are generally bootstrapped and gradually carried into being by the older technologies, of which they gradually displace.
Much horsepower (of the kind with hooves) had been used to bring the steam engine into being, and much fossil fuel technology was required to bring nuclear energy into being. One builds on the other, hopefully in not too wrenching of a way.
One of my favorite little examples of this sort of thing is that of the Japanese Zero fighter plane of WW II. The Japanese got into the aeronautics game quite late, but they were amazingly quick learners. Contrary to blatant racist views to the contrary, they had mastered the state of the art of aeronautical engineer and were good flyers. Their Zero fighter was developed a year or so prior to Pearl Harbor under great secrecy. At the time it was arguable the best fighter plane in the world. However, I read that when they took the first prototype Zero from its hanger to the test field, they had to tow it by horse-drawn wagons because trucks were in such short supply in Japan. So here we had 18th-Century technology helping to bring 20th-Century technolgy into being.
That's the way things usually work. As such, I think the best possible use of our dwindling fossil fuel reserves is to create a sustainable energy infrastructure. Sort of like towing a Zero fighter plane with a horse.
True, but we had not hit "peak horse" or peak oil respectively at the times that those technologies emerged.
Exactly, and while what Joule says is theoretically possible, if the downside slope is too steep, or causes too much social unrest that the infrastructure can't be built, then what? I can easily imagine a scenario where the rich bunker off and continue to use oil the way we waste it today, not building that solar / wind / whatever energy infrastructure for the next generation. The majority of the planet could be left to fend for itself. Need some real world examples of that? Look at how poor nations that can only afford a little oil use it. IN many many countries, it is used by a very few rich and the army, while the vast majority of the population get none and live in poverty. This could very easily be the case. We need a plan B.