26 comments on Fun with Fuel Subsidies and Taxes
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
26 comments on Fun with Fuel Subsidies and Taxes
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction - Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.”
—Richard Feynman
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
There are several other "green" taxes, all of which are supposedly intended to reduce consumption of fossil fuels. Excluding VAT, these account for 7.3% of all taxation in Britain. When Peak Oil really hits home revenue from green taxes is bound to fall. So DaveMart, you are right to say that either spending will be slashed or taxes will be hiked, and that the loss of revenue will be worse in high-tax countries.
The rising price of oil will act as a green tax in itself; so presumably the government should reduce taxes as the price rises. A gradual reduction in the tax will allow the government to wean itself off green taxes over time. Fuel taxes should be set like all other taxes - to pluck the maximum of feathers with the minimum of hissing.
(I'm deliberately ignoring the more general issue of decreased revenues and increased expenditure which was discussed at length in the recent article on Local Government.)
I'd disagree with that and say that economically the correct response would be to put all the increase on to fuel.
This would further restrict demand and lower the amount oil exporting countries could get for the oil, so effectively keeping the excess money in the oil consuming nations.
I have my doubts that that will be politically possible though, and even more doubt that in a recession when payments for unemployment benefit etc rise that the result will be other than large increases in direct taxation.
You're right, that does make more sense. As you point out though, it could be politically untenable. Governments can only force down the bitter medicine if their electorate recognize the disease; this requires a well-educated workforce.