 | ABC 7:30 Report: Richard Heinberg & Prime Minister Kevin Rudd | The Oil Drum | A Pretty Stunning Graph of World Cement Production (and China is Certainly Using It) |  |
185 comments on New feature trial: Comment rating
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
185 comments on New feature trial: Comment rating
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Most people spend more time and energy going around problems than in trying to solve them.”
—Henry Ford
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
Aye, this feature helps to track what people generally think around here about various issues. It's much easier to agree or disagree with a post by clicking an arrow than writing a reply when you don't really have anything to add.
Edit:
Um, not that anyone would wote anything down just because there isn't an agreement. It would have more to do with your opinion about the writer not knowing what the hell he/she/it is writing about ;-)
Hmm...
"Do not rate a comment down just because you disagree with the opinion being expressed."
So much for that idea...
Hence my idea to remove the negative voting altogether. Will remove the opportunity for voting based on opinion, but will still give you an idea which posts are most interesting.
I like having both. The idea is not just to point out good posts (it's worked very well in today's DrumBeat, BTW, highlighting Darwinian's post about Hirsch). It's also to hide spam and such.
In this case there should be separate negative and positive votes. I may post extremely interesting, but controversal opinion and 10 people may appreciate it and vote "for", 11 people will disagree with me and vote "nah", and my opinion will be labeled as spam, because it will have a negative rating of -1. You can't force people to vote irrespective of their opinion coinciding with the post, or just assume they will.
The net result is that 1000 people coming later on the thread will probably ignore my opinion altogether. On the other hand if I see +10 and -11 on some post I will be interested to read it because I'd see it has provoked some interesting reaction among people.
[Edit] In addition to that, opinion-based negative votes will move my comment downthread, which will make it even harder for people to notice. Maybe sorting upthread should be based only on the positive votes.