77 comments on Poll: What do you think of the comment rating system?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
77 comments on Poll: What do you think of the comment rating system?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
- Some predictions on the forthcoming Russian-Ukrainian gas 'crisis'
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“A third of humanity doesn't want to ride bikes anymore; that has profound geopolitical implications.”
—Anne Korin, the co-director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security (May 1, 2005)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
The first day this system was implemented, I looked at the ratings and participated in moving them up and down. Now, I almost completely ignore the ratings because I really have no interest in them. They are just part of background noise. To the extent that my attitude is widespread, they will be of little value as the ratings will be done by the few people who, for some reason, have the ability to rate.
So, I hated the ratings and now really don't give a damn. I would just as soon they go away and don't think they have much use. I didn't check the "if it makes happy block" but if it makes people happy go for it as long as you don't ban people because of it.
If you use Firefox, you can install Adblock Plus and the Adblock Plus Element Hiding extentions. That will allow you to hide CSS elements. I used it to block the rating section and now I don't see them at all.
I really want to be able to decide for myself whether a comment is good or bad. There's no way I can just not look at a rating and I find that it gives me a prejudiced opinion of a comment before I've even read it.
Could you please post the rule you are using to do this? Thank you.
theoildrum.com#DIV(class=extra_voting_forms karma_3_big)
Thank You!! I'd give you a good rating but I just can't see them anymore... :)
Thank you! It's gone and I can now ignore it totally regardless of what TOD does with it.
Thanks Mike! I just installed that AdBlock feature and you gave me my first occasion to use it. Wow, I'll have to consider leaving my entire estate to AdBlock's creator.
That is probably the best. Just ignore it like ads.
i wrote some dumb post against, i was appalled.
There is a long historical tradition here, of scientist voting with hands raised for that or that position, opinion - and having it then made accepted Science. That might concern the number of toes of some exotic animal or the need to stop the plebs smoking or the danger of rays (N, X, cosmic, etc.) Real examples, germane to today.... Solid position papers by high up individuals can also sometimes stifle debate.
Group, collective opinion are often superior to that of individuals. In some areas, that appears to be so.
Guessing, betting, predicting some events.
One popular, engaging read on the topic, is J. S. “On the wisdom of crowds.”
amazon
Crowds can be damn accurate, and anyone can come up with examples. Not in Science though, where paradigm changes are most often resisted. (I know that is not really what we are dealing with here.) In the energy field, popular adherence plays a huge role because it is used all day and everyday and feeds the whole of the economy. So if ppl want to double up, or ride electric scooters, and Science might have some things to say about it, but in the messy daily to and froing, other factors (culture, habits, desires, etc.) intervene. In that sense crowd judgments would be of interest.